saintspremiers wrote:Siposs
Lee
Markworth
Because they couldn't be any less inspiring than 2014
Thanks for that. I think you need to try humour next time.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
saintspremiers wrote:Siposs
Lee
Markworth
Because they couldn't be any less inspiring than 2014
plugger66 wrote:saintspremiers wrote:Siposs
Lee
Markworth
Because they couldn't be any less inspiring than 2014
Thanks for that. I think you need to try humour next time.
happy feet wrote:P66, Con, Big Mart .
Ha ha, well said.plugger66 wrote:happy feet wrote:P66, Con, Big Mart .
Cant speak for the other 2 but I wont be improving.
It was worth trading him just so we didn't have to read the obligatory annual posts in February about how he was was going to have a 'break out' year and 'tear it apart' etc etc. Somehow the annual obligatory pre-season posts on Kosi about to 'explode' just dove-tailed into similar annual pre-season posts on Rhys over the years.Sainternist wrote:I am so pleased Rhys Stanley was traded. He'd be amongst everyone's three players in hopes of improving this year. Trading him was a great move by the club. Just imagine if we were still stuck with that albatross.
Con, it has been a wonderful off-season. (So far) no off-field shenanigans *touch wood*, no whipping boys being massacred and no false hopes for the 2015 season. Unfortunately this probably won't last when the team starts to come good.Con Gorozidis wrote:It was worth trading him just so we didn't have to read the obligatory annual posts in February about how he was was going to have a 'break out' year and 'tear it apart' etc etc. Somehow the annual obligatory pre-season posts on Kosi about to 'explode' just dove-tailed into similar annual pre-season posts on Rhys over the years.Sainternist wrote:I am so pleased Rhys Stanley was traded. He'd be amongst everyone's three players in hopes of improving this year. Trading him was a great move by the club. Just imagine if we were still stuck with that albatross.
A bit of a relief this year.
Good observation and summary. I think people are focussing on the "big" part of the statement. I expect improvement from Dunstan and Saunders as well, but think Dunstan started at such a high level that improvement will be incremental, I would be amazed and overjoyed if he took a massive step up from last year, I am expecting a small step. I think Saunders will improve, but think he will be the type that shines when the engine room improves, rather than being the reason for the engine room improvement. He will be a cream on the cake player rather than the cake, IMO, adding outside run and finishing.bergholt wrote:Summary thus far:
9: Newnes, Ross, Webster
8:
7: Hickey
6: Acres, Billings
5: White
4: Murdoch, Templeton
3: Wright
2: Lee, Markworth, Savage
1: Armitage, Dunstan, Minchington, Roberton
Interesting that Dunstan only has one vote, considering he's got the most runs on the board of any of the kids. Interesting also that Saunders doesn't appear there once - sounds like we've given up on him. Also no votes for Longer, Curren, Bruce, Weller or Shenton, from guys who played a few games last year.
But a clear top three there. If Newnes, Ross and Webster all take a step up and become true AFL-quality mids then we'll be looking a bunch better by the end of the year.
jonesy wrote:Agree on Ross, don't see anything in him to suggest he will make it as an AFL footballer. I guess if he does he will be the biggest improver,as he is a long way off an AFL standard midfielder
Bunk_Moreland wrote: Wight - had a taste and will only get better
Sean Wight is making a comeback at 47 y.o.stinger wrote:Bunk_Moreland wrote: Wight - had a taste and will only get better
who's he....?