Hey Mate,
Hoping you could provide some insight of the offers we had from 4 clubs?
Curious to know what was offered our way.
Thanks
Jaxons
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Jaxons
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=87412&start=325cannavaro17 wrote:Hey Mate,
Hoping you could provide some insight of the offers we had from 4 clubs?
Curious to know what was offered our way.
Thanks
4th last post on this thread page offered us an insight
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
SuperDuper
- Club Player
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Jaxons
It seems to me that 4+7 for 1+21 is about the right offer for GWS to make...
More than that would have been way overs...
My guess is that we considered it closely...
The Frawley compensation clearly affected things... 3+6 for 1+20 may have been done...
But we must have decided we did not rate no. 4 nearly as highly as no. 1...
We would have got McCartin with 3... not sure he is there at 4... it seems we are not into Wright in any big way?
More than that would have been way overs...
My guess is that we considered it closely...
The Frawley compensation clearly affected things... 3+6 for 1+20 may have been done...
But we must have decided we did not rate no. 4 nearly as highly as no. 1...
We would have got McCartin with 3... not sure he is there at 4... it seems we are not into Wright in any big way?
Re: Jaxons
no way.......the club thought picks 4 and 7 weren't enough for pick 1...i agree...and you say the club should have thrown in pick 7 as well......??????SuperDuper wrote:It seems to me that 4+7 for 1+21 is about the right offer for GWS to make...
More than that would have been way overs...
My guess is that we considered it closely...
The Frawley compensation clearly affected things... 3+6 for 1+20 may have been done...
But we must have decided we did not rate no. 4 nearly as highly as no. 1...
We would have got McCartin with 3... not sure he is there at 4... it seems we are not into Wright in any big way?
4, 6 and 7 for 1 and 21 ...maybe....but never offered....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
remboy
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 595 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: Jaxons
Might have been interesting if Melbourne hadn't picked up pick 3 for Frawley. Picks 3& 6 might have been enough to do the deal.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
-
SuperDuper
- Club Player
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Jaxons
I am not saying at all that we should have traded.. I am just saying that from a GWS perspective, 4+7 for 1+21 seems about the right offer to make...stinger wrote:no way.......the club thought picks 4 and 7 weren't enough for pick 1...i agree...and you say the club should have thrown in pick 7 as well......??????SuperDuper wrote:It seems to me that 4+7 for 1+21 is about the right offer for GWS to make...
More than that would have been way overs...
My guess is that we considered it closely...
The Frawley compensation clearly affected things... 3+6 for 1+20 may have been done...
But we must have decided we did not rate no. 4 nearly as highly as no. 1...
We would have got McCartin with 3... not sure he is there at 4... it seems we are not into Wright in any big way?
4, 6 and 7 for 1 and 21 ...maybe....but never offered....
and as you suggest, we obviously did not want to take that offer...
4+6+7 for 1+21 is just not an deal that any club would make, not even GWS...
We clearly rate Petracca highly though, or we would have taken 4+7 I would have thought
Re: Jaxons
SuperDuper wrote:I am not saying at all that we should have traded.. I am just saying that from a GWS perspective, 4+7 for 1+21 seems about the right offer to make...stinger wrote:no way.......the club thought picks 4 and 7 weren't enough for pick 1...i agree...and you say the club should have thrown in pick 7 as well......??????SuperDuper wrote:It seems to me that 4+7 for 1+21 is about the right offer for GWS to make...
More than that would have been way overs...
My guess is that we considered it closely...
The Frawley compensation clearly affected things... 3+6 for 1+20 may have been done...
But we must have decided we did not rate no. 4 nearly as highly as no. 1...
We would have got McCartin with 3... not sure he is there at 4... it seems we are not into Wright in any big way?
4, 6 and 7 for 1 and 21 ...maybe....but never offered....
and as you suggest, we obviously did not want to take that offer...
4+6+7 for 1+21 is just not an deal that any club would make, not even GWS...
We clearly rate Petracca highly though, or we would have taken 4+7 I would have thought
last year gws wanted our pick 3 plus our best and fairest jack steven for their pick 1.....that's a lot more than they were prepared to offer us this year...so f*** 'em......
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5862
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 112 times
Re: Jaxons
Plus one!stinger wrote:last year gws wanted our pick 3 plus our best and fairest jack steven for their pick 1.....that's a lot more than they were prepared to offer us this year...so f*** 'em......
Those Wogan bastards better bloody well use their early picks well this year... we want elite players to choose from in the 2016 PSD.
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage