Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Thats on the assumption Petracca is gone at 1.Bunk_Moreland wrote:Gary Lyon reckons Brayshaw is a lock for Melb @2. If they pick Wright @ 3, Petracca may be @4 is Scott Lucas is correct.Die Hard 7 wrote:Any chance of them becoming interested in McCartin at 1 due to losing Boyd, them moving up to one to take McCartin, then melb taking petracca with 2 and Wright with 3 and leaving Brayshaw to slide to 4?
Right, this starts to add up now. I have felt that there was something fishy about the sudden announcement that Boyd wanted out at GWS. I reckon GWS played the dogs like a piano. I reckon Boyd wanted out and GWS knew it a while back, and then stage managed things to extract the maximum from the dogs, and that is why GWS have been so keen on pick 1. Being so up for Petracca doesn't make sense for a team so stocked with quality young mids. It does make sense however if there is a standout key forward, and you need to replace a quality young key forward.4ever_saint wrote:SEN is saying GWS are likely to pursue McCartin with Pick 1 because of Boyd leaving. It's coming from Scott Lucas, who is McCartin's manager.
Gimme a coupla weeks - just having the bar redone and it will be excellent.Con Gorozidis wrote:Your house. Ill bring the kegThe OtherThommo wrote:Address?Con Gorozidis wrote:4ever_saint wrote:What about 1, Montagna and 40 for 4, 6, 7? I wouldn't be unhappy with that.
If we managed to keep 4,6,7,21,22 I would have a party with free booze.
i still would believe this would happen. just GWS paying absolutely too much for pick 1.jonesy wrote:If we get 4,6 and 7 for pick 1,they can start building the statues of Pelchen and Baines as of tommorrow. Could probably even consider using there faces as the mascot
could happen...smart pick up....dragit wrote:That would suggest they are looking at trading with Melbourne IMOfingers wrote:On SEN just now they are saying GWS will turn their attention to McCartin.
2 & 3 for 4,6 & 7?
That would be amazing if we get 4 (which we take pet) and 6+7 and keep 21 and 22 as jax suggested may be a possibility earlierBunk_Moreland wrote:Gary Lyon reckons Brayshaw is a lock for Melb @2. If they pick Wright @ 3, Petracca may be @4 is Scott Lucas is correct.Die Hard 7 wrote:Any chance of them becoming interested in McCartin at 1 due to losing Boyd, them moving up to one to take McCartin, then melb taking petracca with 2 and Wright with 3 and leaving Brayshaw to slide to 4?
Oops was meant to be 07** that's not saying I rate kreuzeur either.Con Gorozidis wrote:You dont like Jordan Lewis?Siposstar#2 wrote:
Weigh those up!
Lets hope no repeats of 04
Adam Tomlinson a sneaky chance to be wearing the RW&B....?jaxons wrote:Pettraca will be pick 1 whether it's us or GWS I promise.
Me thinks Schneider maybe the man traded... good and experienced small forward to help them..jaxons wrote:MC Gusto wrote:4,6 & 7 or we keep 1.
Its that simple!!!
That's our current position, however they want 21 as well.
We have something up our sleeve that will hopefully leave us with 21 and 22.
We won't be doing it for just 4 & 6 or 4 & 7 I guarantee you.
At worst it may be we give them 21 back, but hoping not.
Our guys love Pettracca and given we have achieved 3 picks inside 22 already, we can stand firm.
But picks 4, 6 & 7 is attractive.
A good small forward who is old and nearly always injured, i hope the Pelican can pull that one off.LondonSaint wrote:Me thinks Schneider maybe the man traded... good and experienced small forward to help them..jaxons wrote:MC Gusto wrote:4,6 & 7 or we keep 1.
Its that simple!!!
That's our current position, however they want 21 as well.
We have something up our sleeve that will hopefully leave us with 21 and 22.
We won't be doing it for just 4 & 6 or 4 & 7 I guarantee you.
At worst it may be we give them 21 back, but hoping not.
Our guys love Pettracca and given we have achieved 3 picks inside 22 already, we can stand firm.
But picks 4, 6 & 7 is attractive.
In summary, they get a good backman (Patful), top mid (Griffen) and good small forward (Schneider)
Not quite Ellen De Generes is gay and Jennifer Lawerence is straight.plugger66 wrote:Again haven't read it so maybe missed something but this is like Ellen degenrious trading up for Jennifer Lawrence.
Not quite Ellen De Generes is gay and Jennifer Lawerence is straight.plugger66 wrote:Again haven't read it so maybe missed something but this is like Ellen degenrious trading up for Jennifer Lawrence.
Surely not unless GWS have completely lost the plot. Why would you trade anything for a guy who's 31 at the start of next year and has played less than 15 games a year for the past three years?LondonSaint wrote:Me thinks Schneider maybe the man traded... good and experienced small forward to help them..
Ryan Griffen is 29 at the start of next season... Schneider has been mostly injured for the past 3 seasons, so he can easily play for another 2 years.. being a small forward/half forward... you need to be smart, he can teach, protect the younger guys... provides veteran leadership... provided he can get his body right.. i think he would be a good addition for the giants.. remember they want veteran experiance and leadership... I would think Gilbert can also help them if he can get his body right.bergholt wrote:Surely not unless GWS have completely lost the plot. Why would you trade anything for a guy who's 31 at the start of next year and has played less than 15 games a year for the past three years?LondonSaint wrote:Me thinks Schneider maybe the man traded... good and experienced small forward to help them..
I reckon he'd be about right for them but his chronic injuries surely make it impossible for them to get medical clearance on him - similar to Trengove.Griggsy wrote:Wasn't Gilbert's name thrown around last year as a potential trade. cant remember how that went though
andrewg wrote:Wow
I probably will s*** my pants if we have pick 4,6,7,21,22...this time tomorrow...
Can see Schneider thrown in in that deal.
Jaxsons updates are fantastic!
For me no trade if they want pick 21..they don't need it, we do.
