GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

saintsRrising · Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:15pm

GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Amongst various combinations.

Con Gorozidis · Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:16pm

Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

matrix · Post: # 1510270Post **matrix** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:16pm

thread 450 on boyd gws and what they have

St Chris · Post: # 1510274Post **St Chris** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:18pm

Pelchen saying on SEN that an offer "multiple picks under 15" was rejected.

We must only accept all 3. Even if they want 1 and 22, only taking 2 of those will be unders.

Do it Pelch!!!

jaxons · Post: # 1510279Post **jaxons** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:21pm

Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.

Saints94 · Post: # 1510282Post **Saints94** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:22pm

jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.

Wow. Hope you are right Jaxons!

They must be pretty damn keen on Petracca..

FQF · Post: # 1510283Post **FQF** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:23pm

Can I just ask, if this is such a good trade for us, then why would GWS do it?

Are they stupid?

Is Petracca worth more to them than to us?

I actually don't quite understand why GWS would sell the house for Petracca while we are so willing to trade him away.

lefty · Post: # 1510284Post **lefty** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:23pm

jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.

If that happens, I'd be over the moon. I would of thought our pick 22 would be included.

FQF · Post: # 1510285Post **FQF** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:23pm

Saints94 wrote:
jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.
Wow. Hope you are right Jaxons!

They must be pretty damn keen on Petracca..

Exactly - and why is that?

matrix · Post: # 1510286Post **matrix** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:24pm

seriously?
they would trade 4 6 and 7 for pick 1

hahahahahahaah

quick get the paperwork
NOW!

saint-stu · Post: # 1510287Post **saint-stu** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:24pm

Wow, maybe a silver lining after missing out on Boyd.

dragit · Post: # 1510288Post **dragit** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:24pm

jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.

Surely not… are they completely mad?

Con Gorozidis · Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:25pm

FQF wrote:Can I just ask, if this is such a good trade for us, then why would GWS do it?

Are they stupid?

Is Petracca worth more to them than to us?

I actually don't quite understand why GWS would sell the house for Petracca while we are so willing to trade him away.

Agree on the face of it - its massively in our favour.

For them to do it it would have to be for broader list balance reasons. Maybe they dont want 3 more 18 yo kids? Maybe they will try for another older player.

bigred · Post: # 1510290Post **bigred** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:25pm

Why would they do that?

Why would we do that?

Is the top ten that good?

savatage · Post: # 1510291Post **savatage** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:25pm

Brilliant. Bulldogs sold the farm for an unproven player! Oozes potential but is being paid like a superstar....could go either way.

If we could seriously nab 4,6 & 7 for pick 1 then that's a major one.

If any other good players are floating around - we could always then flick Swans 41 for Membrey & force a player into the PSD if there's someone good we are wanting but can't do a deal on currently.

Sobraz · Post: # 1510292Post **Sobraz** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:25pm

Dont think GWS need 3 new 18 year olds on thier already young list.

1 good one would be enough.

LTN16 · Post: # 1510293Post **LTN16** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:26pm

dragit wrote:
jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.
Surely not… are they completely mad?

I bloody hope they are

savatage · Post: # 1510294Post **savatage** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:26pm

Sobraz wrote:Dont think GWS need 3 new 18 year olds on thier already young list.

1 good one would be enough.

Absolutely

They'll only go home a year later anyway - they shouldn't even bother

Con Gorozidis · Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:27pm

bigred wrote:Why would they do that?

Why would we do that?

Is the top ten that good?

The top 10 is the top 10.

3 players in the top 10 will likely get you 2 good players.

Pick 1 alone will likely get you 1 good player.

Sobraz · Post: # 1510297Post **Sobraz** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:27pm

jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.

Foot in each camp there.

Make the call Jaxons and cover yourself in Saintsational glory.

MC Gusto · Post: # 1510298Post **MC Gusto** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:27pm

Sobraz wrote:Dont think GWS need 3 new 18 year olds on thier already young list.

1 good one would be enough.

correct in fact i am not even sure they have room on their list...

this is working out beautifully

St Chris · Post: # 1510300Post **St Chris** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:28pm

Dave Matthews (GWS CEO) confirming on Trade Radio they'll speak to St Kilda regarding Pick 1.

Sounded like they were still look for experienced players also.

matrix · Post: # 1510301Post **matrix** » Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:28pm

theyll take pet
he'll hate gws leave the year after and come to us on a decent contract via a swap for a pick we get next year

lol

imagine that

SemperFidelis · Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:29pm

jaxons wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Well happy to do 4,6,7 for pick 1

Likely this will happen.

Now this makes my day happier too.

Get it done.

Con Gorozidis · Wed 15 Oct 2014 4:29pm

savatage wrote:Brilliant. Bulldogs sold the farm for an unproven player! Oozes potential but is being paid like a superstar....could go either way.

If we could seriously nab 4,6 & 7 for pick 1 then that's a major one.

If any other good players are floating around - we could always then flick Swans 41 for Membrey & force a player into the PSD if there's someone good we are wanting but can't do a deal on currently.

Could Tom Boyd end up an over-sized version of Tom Scully?
Maybe its GWS payback.

GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1

Re: GWS now have 4, 6, 7 to trade for pick 1