Stanley to Port?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501959Post FQF »

I know it’s been discussed to death, and personally I would prefer to keep him, but Hinkley made some interesting comments that Port are deep in discussions with another club about drafting a forward/ruck. It’s not Lycett, Ryder or Vickery. Could very well be Stanley though. The possible positive here is that teams on the cusp of premierships often pay overs for a player they think will be the finishing touches on their flag quest. I wouldn’t want anything less than a first rounder for Stanley though – I still believe that he will come good.

http://news.com.au/sport/afl/ken-hinkle ... 7065633733


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501962Post Bunk_Moreland »

They should throw the house at Ryder


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501963Post Saints94 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:They should throw the house at Ryder
+1. Would improve there list immensely IMO, better ruckman than Lobbe & can go forward & kick 30+ goals for the year..


Hallalj#3
Club Player
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 2:38pm

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501969Post Hallalj#3 »

I for 1 would put him on the Untouchable list. I think When we improve he's going to be unstoppable no coincidence our 2 best team games this year were when he looked awesome no defender can go with him.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501973Post matrix »

it is ryder
its all over the news

for the 300th time this year
rhys isnt going anywhere


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501985Post gringo »

matrix wrote:it is ryder
its all over the news

for the 300th time this year
rhys isnt going anywhere
I think he's been saying that Ryder is a long shot but they are in discussions with another.


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501986Post FQF »

gringo wrote:
matrix wrote:it is ryder
its all over the news

for the 300th time this year
rhys isnt going anywhere
I think he's been saying that Ryder is a long shot but they are in discussions with another.
Yes


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501987Post kosifantutti »

matrix wrote:
for the 300th time this year
rhys isnt going anywhere
Why do you say that?


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501994Post Con Gorozidis »

Ryder would have got Port over the line.
They should throw the house at him agree.

I guess they are worried he might choose Brissie instead.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1501998Post gringo »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Ryder would have got Port over the line.
They should throw the house at him agree.

I guess they are worried he might choose Brissie instead.

He's apparently very keen to get to be near his wife's family in Queensland. They would have to make it really tempting.


3rd generation saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4661
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
Location: Jurassic Park

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502053Post 3rd generation saint »

The chance to win a premiership would be an awful big incentive.


Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
3rd generation saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4661
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
Location: Jurassic Park

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502054Post 3rd generation saint »

The chance to win a premiership would be an awful big incentive.


Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502055Post Bunk_Moreland »

Image

Meanwhile Brendon say.....

How unethical of Port to try and take a cleanskin Essendon player


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502073Post Saints94 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:Image

Meanwhile Brendon say.....

How unethical of Port to try and take a cleanskin Essendon player
:lol: Seeing BJ in our colours again makes my eyes hurt.. :|


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502117Post stinger »

if the club traded rhys to pot i would do my lolly.....that would be it as far as the pelican goes....stanley got us the biggest win of the season....

it's a crap time to be following a side not in the finals......i was over the moon with sed's signing...then i read this crap..... :evil:


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502131Post matrix »

kosifantutti wrote:
matrix wrote:
for the 300th time this year
rhys isnt going anywhere
Why do you say that?
Why do u think I'm saying that.
?
Will stand up and take the "we told u so" if something does happen
But I'm 95% sure he will be in our jumper next year.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502139Post kosifantutti »

matrix wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
matrix wrote:
for the 300th time this year
rhys isnt going anywhere
Why do you say that?
Why do u think I'm saying that.
?
Will stand up and take the "we told u so" if something does happen
But I'm 95% sure he will be in our jumper next year.
I still don't know why you're saying it. I thought you might have some inside info.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502148Post Toy Saint »

Can understand exactly why Port would like Stanley. Pretty sure he's from Adelaide too.

As has been mentioned, he was outstanding in out two best wins, and i reckon he'd be a real asset in a good team.

Personally, I would not swap him for their 1st round pick, I'd want more. We got a good deal for McEvoy and I reckon Stanley is a lot more valuable than Ben. A good young midfielder, their 1st draft pick plus steak knives may do it for me. But I'd rather keep him.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502150Post plugger66 »

Toy Saint wrote:Can understand exactly why Port would like Stanley. Pretty sure he's from Adelaide too.

As has been mentioned, he was outstanding in out two best wins, and i reckon he'd be a real asset in a good team.

Personally, I would not swap him for their 1st round pick, I'd want more. We got a good deal for McEvoy and I reckon Stanley is a lot more valuable than Ben. A good young midfielder, their 1st draft pick plus steak knives may do it for me. But I'd rather keep him.

I think we would swap him in a heartbeat for pick 15 and IMO we should but they could get a better player than Stanley with that pick. I reckon he is a late second rounder and not worth losing because we don't have anyone on our list who can play his 2 positions.


Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502158Post Toy Saint »

plugger66 wrote:
Toy Saint wrote:Can understand exactly why Port would like Stanley. Pretty sure he's from Adelaide too.

As has been mentioned, he was outstanding in out two best wins, and i reckon he'd be a real asset in a good team.

Personally, I would not swap him for their 1st round pick, I'd want more. We got a good deal for McEvoy and I reckon Stanley is a lot more valuable than Ben. A good young midfielder, their 1st draft pick plus steak knives may do it for me. But I'd rather keep him.

I think we would swap him in a heartbeat for pick 15 and IMO we should but they could get a better player than Stanley with that pick. I reckon he is a late second rounder and not worth losing because we don't have anyone on our list who can play his 2 positions.
Would you let them have Spencer White for pick 15?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502159Post plugger66 »

Toy Saint wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Toy Saint wrote:Can understand exactly why Port would like Stanley. Pretty sure he's from Adelaide too.

As has been mentioned, he was outstanding in out two best wins, and i reckon he'd be a real asset in a good team.

Personally, I would not swap him for their 1st round pick, I'd want more. We got a good deal for McEvoy and I reckon Stanley is a lot more valuable than Ben. A good young midfielder, their 1st draft pick plus steak knives may do it for me. But I'd rather keep him.

I think we would swap him in a heartbeat for pick 15 and IMO we should but they could get a better player than Stanley with that pick. I reckon he is a late second rounder and not worth losing because we don't have anyone on our list who can play his 2 positions.
Would you let them have Spencer White for pick 15?

Yep.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502163Post Con Gorozidis »

Toy Saint wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Toy Saint wrote:Can understand exactly why Port would like Stanley. Pretty sure he's from Adelaide too.

As has been mentioned, he was outstanding in out two best wins, and i reckon he'd be a real asset in a good team.

Personally, I would not swap him for their 1st round pick, I'd want more. We got a good deal for McEvoy and I reckon Stanley is a lot more valuable than Ben. A good young midfielder, their 1st draft pick plus steak knives may do it for me. But I'd rather keep him.

I think we would swap him in a heartbeat for pick 15 and IMO we should but they could get a better player than Stanley with that pick. I reckon he is a late second rounder and not worth losing because we don't have anyone on our list who can play his 2 positions.
Would you let them have Spencer White for pick 15?
I cant see Port having any interest in Spencer. They are ready to go now. They need a hardened AFL player who can play 20 games plus finals. Ryder perfect fit for Port. Then Stanley would also be very handy at Port.

And for us - wed be trading an unknown kid (Spencer) for an unknown kid (pick 15).


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6084
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502166Post MC Gusto »

Absolutely spot on plugger. If they were to offer pick 15 you'd do it in a heartbeat but they won't so it's not an issue. Honestly can't believe some here saying they wouldn't trade him or if they would they require a first round pick + something else??! That's crazy for a player that has honestly played a handful of good games...that's right games...not seasons


#1 Ryder fan
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3385
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502172Post older saint »

I think Port will want Stanley however with the focus now on Petrecca i don't think we can afford to lose him. We have suffered the teasing from Stanley and he now has 50 games and just hitting his straps, to me trading is like buying a spec stock and the just as it is about to rise selling - makes no sense.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Stanley to Port?

Post: # 1502176Post plugger66 »

older saint wrote:I think Port will want Stanley however with the focus now on Petrecca i don't think we can afford to lose him. We have suffered the teasing from Stanley and he now has 50 games and just hitting his straps, to me trading is like buying a spec stock and the just as it is about to rise selling - makes no sense.

Well it does it you get overpaid. No one will though. And I don't buy this 50 games stuff. Surely its years in the system otherwise there is no point n keeping Marksworth as he most likelt wont get to 50 games for another 3 or 4 years. Stanley has been in the system for a long while now and needs to become a better player or at least more consistent.


Post Reply