Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
I don't see how keeping Dal Santo would have been better than doing what we did. We kept him in 2013. Where did we finish that year? He might have made a difference, but certainly not put us in the 8. Longer is an interesting prospect, and having him Hickey, Stanley, Peirce and Holmes is going to be interesting too. It seems that not all of them can have long term futures at the same club, so we develop them all and trade on 2 or 3 to clubs who have something we need. It's a good strategy, but a bitter pill to swallow. But nothing good comes without a little sacrifice.
I'm prepared to trust the judgement for now. I'm more annoyed that we didn't get a hell of a lot for DalSanto, I certainly feel that we were under-compensated.
Still, I think the best way for this club to look is forwards after many years of poor decisions. Pelchen represents the new era as well as Gordon or Finnis to me, and so far they get a tick from me.
Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------
gringo wrote:When we lost Barry Hall pick 13 turned into Dal, hopefully the pick that keeps giving eg Longer will develop into a huge reliable Ruck who will attract another high draft pick or become our main man so we can trade out Hickey for a high pick. Otherwise Pierce and Holmes become guns and one of them become trade bait. Either way the two new franchises might need rucks once their mids develop and want to swap their fourth best mid for one. I would say there is some kind of logical unemotional strategy behind it. There is currently four potential high level rucks on our list. In the past we have struggled to get one.
Don't forget we got the Barry Hall pick by sending Craig Devonport to Carlton where he played a total of one game. Maybe we should have held on to Devonport.
Point well made KF.
A footy list is like an evolving garden. Sometimes you have to make way so new flowers can bloom.
Sometimes the seeds you plant wont grow or will be disappointing and sometimes a seed can grow into a productive plant or flower!
With limited space in your garden - sometimes some old faithful plants need to be removed to make room for new growth and new seeds. It might like bare for a period when you remove the old and plant the new - but from the seeds can come a new garden.
And Spring is upon us - the appropriate time for a Spring clean and trading/drafting season.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Tue 09 Sep 2014 12:59pm, edited 1 time in total.
gringo wrote:When we lost Barry Hall pick 13 turned into Dal, hopefully the pick that keeps giving eg Longer will develop into a huge reliable Ruck who will attract another high draft pick or become our main man so we can trade out Hickey for a high pick. Otherwise Pierce and Holmes become guns and one of them become trade bait. Either way the two new franchises might need rucks once their mids develop and want to swap their fourth best mid for one. I would say there is some kind of logical unemotional strategy behind it. There is currently four potential high level rucks on our list. In the past we have struggled to get one.
Don't forget we got the Barry Hall pick by sending Craig Devonport to Carlton where he played a total of one game. Maybe we should have held on to Devonport.
Point well made KF.
A footy list is like an evolving garden. Sometimes you have to make way so new flowers can bloom.
Sometimes the seeds you plant wont grow or will be disappointing and sometimes a seed can grow into a productive plant or flower!
And Spring is upon us - the appropriate time for a Spring clean and trading/drafting season.
Plenty of manure in this thread to spread on that analogical garden.
gringo wrote:When we lost Barry Hall pick 13 turned into Dal, hopefully the pick that keeps giving eg Longer will develop into a huge reliable Ruck who will attract another high draft pick or become our main man so we can trade out Hickey for a high pick. Otherwise Pierce and Holmes become guns and one of them become trade bait. Either way the two new franchises might need rucks once their mids develop and want to swap their fourth best mid for one. I would say there is some kind of logical unemotional strategy behind it. There is currently four potential high level rucks on our list. In the past we have struggled to get one.
Don't forget we got the Barry Hall pick by sending Craig Devonport to Carlton where he played a total of one game. Maybe we should have held on to Devonport.
Point well made KF.
A footy list is like an evolving garden. Sometimes you have to make way so new flowers can bloom.
Sometimes the seeds you plant wont grow or will be disappointing and sometimes a seed can grow into a productive plant or flower!
And Spring is upon us - the appropriate time for a Spring clean and trading/drafting season.
Plenty of manure in this thread to spread on that analogical garden.
He's all class. That passage on the wing where he ended up with the goal is everything about him that I miss.
Always a Saint. Even in that hideous blue and white strip.
In a knockout final how composed did he look? It was like he was playing in a r22 match against the bottom side. A level above. Chris Scott lost the match by not tagging him.
Makes you wonder why he was so vanilla last year, when you see him play like he did tonight. Roos win. We lose. Again.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Those on here listing this as a loss for us is confusing me. How could it have been a loss for us if we finished bottom four with him anyway? Realistically what difference would he have made had we kept him here? Not finishing bottom? Whoopty do. I want the Saints to finish first, not 17th.
Dal is an exceptional player.
I have always been pro -Dal. Even when he copped criticism I was a huge supporter of him - especially in 2011.
When we were crap in 11 and 12 - Dal ALWAYS stood up against good sides when were losing.
He was always there in the tough times (which is more than i can say for many of our other so called stars)
I rate Dal incredibly highly as a bloke and player.
Anyone is is welcome to search my old posts on this (i used to say he should be skipper back if you check my 20111-12 posts).
So who is surprised he played a good game?
But so what. If he played for us we would still be bottom. Are people so thick they think Dal would get us off bottom?
Dal has helped the Roos but the reality is the Roos made a pre-lim after 7 years hard yakka buiding from the ground up via youth.
They recruit a guy like Dal at the END of that process.
We are at the start of that process. Maybe in 5 years we will recruit some top older players from sh*t teams looking to play finals.