What to do with Gilbert
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
What to do with Gilbert
Watching last weeks game really epitomised many aspects of Gilbert's game.
The good of the dash from defence, the direct given to players in zoning , the aggressive take on the game attitude.
The bad is poor disposal, 5 clangers (most of any on the team) , below 70 % efficiency on disposal.
Gilbert is one player which i feel many clubs pushing will look at. What he does well is very good and not common in AFL. Better teams can also trade off the disposal errors for what he brings better than a poor side. 3 more good games will only increase his value.
Has been a great servant of the club but to me i could see GC trading a second round pick or even 1st pick for gilbert combined with our second round pick ( say Gilbert and pick 20 for CG pick 11?
thoughts?
The good of the dash from defence, the direct given to players in zoning , the aggressive take on the game attitude.
The bad is poor disposal, 5 clangers (most of any on the team) , below 70 % efficiency on disposal.
Gilbert is one player which i feel many clubs pushing will look at. What he does well is very good and not common in AFL. Better teams can also trade off the disposal errors for what he brings better than a poor side. 3 more good games will only increase his value.
Has been a great servant of the club but to me i could see GC trading a second round pick or even 1st pick for gilbert combined with our second round pick ( say Gilbert and pick 20 for CG pick 11?
thoughts?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: What to do with Gilbert
Has been discussed in here
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=86703
But I have a similar view to you old saint. His good qualities are very good but he is flawed. He is in our top 12 players but hes certainly not good enough that he will have any tangible effect on our results. His good is almost outweighed by his bad. But he goes ok. He is athletic, has great run and carry, can break a tackle and is good in the air. But his turnovers are often chronic.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=86703
But I have a similar view to you old saint. His good qualities are very good but he is flawed. He is in our top 12 players but hes certainly not good enough that he will have any tangible effect on our results. His good is almost outweighed by his bad. But he goes ok. He is athletic, has great run and carry, can break a tackle and is good in the air. But his turnovers are often chronic.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: What to do with Gilbert
I'd be surprised if his name wasn't floated around to see what is offered. I could see Lyon salivating at the thought of getting a tall defending, line breaking, long kicking swing man. Lyon wouldn't too fazed by his lack of accuracy. Gilbert makes us a better rebounding team for the next few years but if we are keeping Dempster, Ray and by the sounds of it Gwilt then I think we have enough experienced bodies to let him go for a decent pick while we groom Wright, Webster, Acres back there.
Re: What to do with Gilbert
Bluthy wrote: Gilbert makes us a better rebounding team for the next few years but if we are keeping Dempster, Ray and by the sounds of it Gwilt
He is a far better player (and younger) than those three... We are better keeping him and offloading any or all of the above...
It'd have to be a very good trade weighted in our favor to get rid of Gilbo IMO...
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 265 times
- Been thanked: 121 times
Re: What to do with Gilbert
Sobraz wrote:Bluthy wrote: Gilbert makes us a better rebounding team for the next few years but if we are keeping Dempster, Ray and by the sounds of it Gwilt
He is a far better player (and younger) than those three... We are better keeping him and offloading any or all of the above...
It'd have to be a very good trade weighted in our favor to get rid of Gilbo IMO...
Agree ,not too sure we would get much for the 3.Dempster,Gwilt too slow,Ray maybe something
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
- Location: by the seaside..
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 187 times
Re: What to do with Gilbert
what is his contract situation ? .. rumour on Adelaide radio that the Crows are talking to one of our defenders and its not Sam Fisher (and its not Rhys Stanley either) ...they didnt name who but now that Geary has signed not a lot of others left with currency ..
“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: What to do with Gilbert
Gilbo is 28, so there are a few years left for him. Fisher, Rooey, Gwilt, Dempster have one more year. Monty and Ray maybe 2.
Yes, Gilbo's disposal can often be poor, but we need to retain some experience. His sometimes poor disposal is not going to keep us out of the finals. His good play is what the team will need at times.
We need to be careful not to go down the Melbourne path, where we lose all of our experience.
Yes, Gilbo's disposal can often be poor, but we need to retain some experience. His sometimes poor disposal is not going to keep us out of the finals. His good play is what the team will need at times.
We need to be careful not to go down the Melbourne path, where we lose all of our experience.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri 09 May 2014 1:08pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: What to do with Gilbert
Very surprised with a number of the comments on Gilbert. Given we have a team that lacks pace and key defenders surely we cant contemplate trading someone who has both can we? I also don't buy into the argument that his poor disposal outweighs his positives. I think he has improved his disposal , but has some way to go. I look forward to seeing Gilbo in a saints jumper for some time to come.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: What to do with Gilbert
It makes no sense to trade away a good player with 4/5 years remaining...unless he wants to leave
That stated, mature player, good runner, crappy kick but the good outweighs the bad greatly.
That stated, mature player, good runner, crappy kick but the good outweighs the bad greatly.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: What to do with Gilbert
sacrifice him to the god of lusty schoolgirls
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: What to do with Gilbert
But herein lays the dilemma. What if we could get a top 20 pick for him or some sort of upgrade to net an extra quality kid? That player could give us 14 years of great footy and will be in his prime when we are contending for a flag. Gilbert is coming down the other side of mountain. Against trading him is you do further damage to the fabric of the football club and facilitate more of a losing culture for the next few years. This is really our last year to be able to do a trade like this with Gilbert and/or Montagna (I don't see Armo as tradable). Tough decisions to be made.The Redeemer wrote:It makes no sense to trade away a good player with 4/5 years remaining...unless he wants to leave
That stated, mature player, good runner, crappy kick but the good outweighs the bad greatly.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2190
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
- Location: by the seaside..
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 187 times
Re: What to do with Gilbert
Top 20 pick is effectively a first round pick - I don't know that there are many clubs that are going to part with their first round pick for a guy who has struggled to get on the park in the past 2 seasons. He is worth more to us than his value on the open market.Bluthy wrote:But herein lays the dilemma. What if we could get a top 20 pick for him or some sort of upgrade to net an extra quality kid? That player could give us 14 years of great footy and will be in his prime when we are contending for a flag. Gilbert is coming down the other side of mountain. Against trading him is you do further damage to the fabric of the football club and facilitate more of a losing culture for the next few years. This is really our last year to be able to do a trade like this with Gilbert and/or Montagna (I don't see Armo as tradable). Tough decisions to be made.The Redeemer wrote:It makes no sense to trade away a good player with 4/5 years remaining...unless he wants to leave
That stated, mature player, good runner, crappy kick but the good outweighs the bad greatly.
“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: What to do with Gilbert
He's been great this year prefer to keep him and lose others.
Paper side joey singed till 2016? Thought he was the trade g
Bait
Paper side joey singed till 2016? Thought he was the trade g
Bait
Fortius Quo Fidelius