I hate negative/negating players
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I hate negative/negating players
Have been meaning to write for sometime regarding this , but the post re Curran now a Tagger instead of a midfielder annoys me.
Why are there taggers? Why does a coach feel the need? Doesn't it already mean you've given into the other teams midfield if you need one?
Surely if you had a good ruckmen and 3 good ball winners then you don't need 1 taking out their best player that still invariably gets the ball enough to still have an impact?
We have Jones, Weller and Curren as 'run with' players. Would it be such a bad idea to tell Weller to get the ball himself instead of trying to stop another player?
I know we made a few Gf's, however we didn't win. Maybe negative football can't win premierships!? If we had another pure mid could we have won?
Port, Swans, Pies, GC, cats are the best going around currently with most having quality ball winners and making other teams follow them..
So why do it? Just get the ball and sack the s***
Why are there taggers? Why does a coach feel the need? Doesn't it already mean you've given into the other teams midfield if you need one?
Surely if you had a good ruckmen and 3 good ball winners then you don't need 1 taking out their best player that still invariably gets the ball enough to still have an impact?
We have Jones, Weller and Curren as 'run with' players. Would it be such a bad idea to tell Weller to get the ball himself instead of trying to stop another player?
I know we made a few Gf's, however we didn't win. Maybe negative football can't win premierships!? If we had another pure mid could we have won?
Port, Swans, Pies, GC, cats are the best going around currently with most having quality ball winners and making other teams follow them..
So why do it? Just get the ball and sack the s***
Carn Saints
Re: I hate negative/negating players
One of my biggest pet peeves as well.
Right up there with defensive forwards.
Just select players who know where the goals are and let them go.
Give them direction and tell them that forward pressure is important.
But let them play their natural game, once the confidence comes and they feel part of the team I'm sure the defensive tackles and everything will follow.
Consistency is key.
Right up there with defensive forwards.
Just select players who know where the goals are and let them go.
Give them direction and tell them that forward pressure is important.
But let them play their natural game, once the confidence comes and they feel part of the team I'm sure the defensive tackles and everything will follow.
Consistency is key.
Re: I hate negative/negating players
And on the midfielders.
Why not back your own player to find his own ball and be effective.
Asking someone to be a rather to me always seems a slap in the face.
"Okay, you can play this week but don't get the ball. You have to just stop their best player. Don't play your natural game, we don't think you are good enough."
Why not back your own player to find his own ball and be effective.
Asking someone to be a rather to me always seems a slap in the face.
"Okay, you can play this week but don't get the ball. You have to just stop their best player. Don't play your natural game, we don't think you are good enough."
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: I hate negative/negating players
For the same reason they put defenders on forwards, to negate their output.Batnoe wrote: Why are there taggers? Why does a coach feel the need?
Sydney have done it twice, almost three times. And they're a chance to do it a third this year.Batnoe wrote: Maybe negative football can't win premierships!? If we had another pure mid could we have won?
Cornes, McGlynn, Macaffer, Guthrie. Almost every team has one or two.Batnoe wrote:Port, Swans, Pies, GC, cats are the best going around currently with most having quality ball winners and making other teams follow them..
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:17pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: I hate negative/negating players
Stupid thread. Modern day football has plenty of negating players, simply because sometimes you come up against a side that has a gun midfielder in it that you want to stop rather than go head to head with.
The better ones hurt their opponents by going the other way. Eg Ling, Crowley, Carrazzo, Sewell, Cornes etc..
Show me a premiership team over the last 10 years that didn't have a good 'negator'...??
The better ones hurt their opponents by going the other way. Eg Ling, Crowley, Carrazzo, Sewell, Cornes etc..
Show me a premiership team over the last 10 years that didn't have a good 'negator'...??
Re: I hate negative/negating players
Simple equations really.
1) B Harvey v M Weller (attacking)
Harvey gets 27 possessions and 1 goal, 75% efficiency, lots of run and carry, brings other players into the game, a momentum generating player.
Weller has 23 possessions, 1 goal, 70% efficiency, solid game but not game changing.
2) Harvey v Weller (tagging)
Harvey gets 15 possessions, no goals, minimal impact, doesn't build momentum for the team.
Weller gets 12 possessions, no goals, frustrates Harvey, draws a couple of frees as a result.
You could argue either way which is more valuable, but in my opinion, option number 2 would further the team's chances of winning.
1) B Harvey v M Weller (attacking)
Harvey gets 27 possessions and 1 goal, 75% efficiency, lots of run and carry, brings other players into the game, a momentum generating player.
Weller has 23 possessions, 1 goal, 70% efficiency, solid game but not game changing.
2) Harvey v Weller (tagging)
Harvey gets 15 possessions, no goals, minimal impact, doesn't build momentum for the team.
Weller gets 12 possessions, no goals, frustrates Harvey, draws a couple of frees as a result.
You could argue either way which is more valuable, but in my opinion, option number 2 would further the team's chances of winning.
Re: I hate negative/negating players
And at times we've had 3 in the team
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
Carn Saints
Re: I hate negative/negating players
Batnoe wrote:And at times we've had 3 in the team
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
I thought our contested possessions was going OK. I thought it was uncontested that was the problem.
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 289 times
- Been thanked: 281 times
Re: I hate negative/negating players
Is that because we have too many inside types (like taggers) in the team at once?plugger66 wrote:Batnoe wrote:And at times we've had 3 in the team
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
I thought our contested possessions was going OK. I thought it was uncontested that was the problem.
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
Re: I hate negative/negating players
True Believer wrote:Is that because we have too many inside types (like taggers) in the team at once?plugger66 wrote:Batnoe wrote:And at times we've had 3 in the team
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
I thought our contested possessions was going OK. I thought it was uncontested that was the problem.
Im not sure taggers are the problem. i think onlky Weller is tagging at the moment. We just have to many inside players on our list and not enough runners. By the way I hear Torquay goes ok.
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 289 times
- Been thanked: 281 times
Re: I hate negative/negating players
Goes great - get yourself lunch at the Jan Juc pub if you ever get the chance - Parma's you couldn't jump over!! Bloody cold at night though at this time of year......plugger66 wrote:True Believer wrote:Is that because we have too many inside types (like taggers) in the team at once?plugger66 wrote:Batnoe wrote:And at times we've had 3 in the team
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
I thought our contested possessions was going OK. I thought it was uncontested that was the problem.
Im not sure taggers are the problem. i think onlky Weller is tagging at the moment. We just have to many inside players on our list and not enough runners. By the way I hear Torquay goes ok.
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
Re: I hate negative/negating players
True Believer wrote:Goes great - get yourself lunch at the Jan Juc pub if you ever get the chance - Parma's you couldn't jump over!! Bloody cold at night though at this time of year......plugger66 wrote:True Believer wrote:Is that because we have too many inside types (like taggers) in the team at once?plugger66 wrote:Batnoe wrote:And at times we've had 3 in the team
Jones, Curren and Weller.
We're currently last in contested possessions.. Perhaps it's because our players are more interested in trying to stop their player getting it instead of getting it themselves..
I thought our contested possessions was going OK. I thought it was uncontested that was the problem.
Im not sure taggers are the problem. i think onlky Weller is tagging at the moment. We just have to many inside players on our list and not enough runners. By the way I hear Torquay goes ok.
You feel the cold when you are blind?
Re: I hate negative/negating players
We're actually 3rd last
In front of Melbourne And lions only
In front of Melbourne And lions only
Carn Saints