Why? We know what he brings to the team. He has had his goes at it. Someone else for mine.terry smith rules wrote:ready to be howled down but
in
Maister
At least he competes, he knows how to position himself and can gets his hand on the ball
changes for next week
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: changes for next week
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Re: changes for next week
What about one of the ruckman? Pierce/Holmes? Can't be any worse than what has been dished up.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: changes for next week
If Lee doesn't kick half a dozen at Sandy in the next few weeks then he's caput.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
Re: changes for next week
savage and curren are definites...and probably stanley for lee......can't see saunders and jones staying in either....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8391
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1911 times
- Been thanked: 889 times
Re: changes for next week
Changes?
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.
Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.
Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: changes for next week
I watched but sadly it was 2.5 hrs of my life I'll never get back.WellardSaint wrote:Changes?
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.
Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: changes for next week
What was wrong with Milera?stinger wrote:savage and curren are definites...and probably stanley for lee......can't see saunders and jones staying in either....
According to the saints.com.au
"In addition to this, Tom Lee, who had spent time in the ruck as well as up forward, was subbed prior to half-time, allowing Clint Jones to impact the game as an extra midfielder."
'impact the game' is a very generous description....
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: changes for next week
Time for a few senior players who are just plodding along to get a wake up call.
Out : Montagna, Dempster, Lee, Saunders, Jones, Longer (inj)
In : Stanley, Siposs, Gwilt, Savage, Milera, Curren
If Milera is still injured, then Markworth should get a crack.
Players like Dempster and Montagna are twice as talented and valuable as guys like Weller and Simpkin, but they look like they're playing with half the desire.
Out : Montagna, Dempster, Lee, Saunders, Jones, Longer (inj)
In : Stanley, Siposs, Gwilt, Savage, Milera, Curren
If Milera is still injured, then Markworth should get a crack.
Players like Dempster and Montagna are twice as talented and valuable as guys like Weller and Simpkin, but they look like they're playing with half the desire.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: changes for next week
Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1968
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: changes for next week
Out Lee, Longer, Saunders, Dempster, Jones
In: Pierce, Stanley, Savage, Gwilt, Curran
In: Pierce, Stanley, Savage, Gwilt, Curran
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: changes for next week
Ok, here goes. I was lying awake last night an came up with this gem.....
Out: Riewoldt
Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....
Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.
Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.
It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.
Out: Riewoldt
Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....
Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.
Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.
It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.
Re: changes for next week
St Chris wrote:Ok, here goes. I was lying awake last night an came up with this gem.....
Out: Riewoldt
Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....
Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.
Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.
It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.
I like your left field thinking. The opposition will have to spend more than 2 minutes thinking about the Saints forward line also. If you recall the saints made a grand final after Locket left as well.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
Re: changes for next week
Two weeks ago when many were calling for Stanley to be out and be replaced by Lee, others said that is ridiculous to expect him at 194cm go in as a back up ruck and Saturday saw all those chickens come home to roost. He is a forward and should be played as such.CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
Re: changes for next week
Two weeks ago when many were calling for Stanley to be out and be replaced by Lee, others said that is ridiculous to expect him at 194cm go in as a back up ruck and Saturday saw all those chickens come home to roost. He is a forward and should be played as such.CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: changes for next week
I'm sure your lunch would have been a lot nicer than watching the footy. I reckon having an in depth conversation with your mother in law would be far more appealing than watching the Saints play.WellardSaint wrote:Changes?
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.
Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: changes for next week
Like the coach said his negatives outweighed his positives.CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
With a comment like that unless he has a contract for next year then he has 6 or so weeks to save his career.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: changes for next week
magnifisaint wrote:Like the coach said his negatives outweighed his positives.CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
With a comment like that unless he has a contract for next year then he has 6 or so weeks to save his career.
What the hell does that even mean? I mean they pick a undersized key forward who then has no Inside 50's to work with then use him in the ruck against one of the leagues biggest ruckman. If the AFL had Fair Work officers theyed be knocking on Richardsons door asking what the hell he is doing to Lee.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19157
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: changes for next week
We struggled last year to get it out of the back half after losing both BJ and Gram.FQF wrote:Our transitional play from defence to offence is our major weakness and the source of many of our problems. If we could get Fisher, Wright, Gilbert and Roberton back into the line up, we'd look a lot better.
I wish Savage offered us something. We are ravaged with injury and here is a player who is supposedly decent who cannot get a game.
This year we lost Dal plus those players you mentioned.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: changes for next week
It means he doesn't have much tickerCURLY wrote:magnifisaint wrote:Like the coach said his negatives outweighed his positives.CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
With a comment like that unless he has a contract for next year then he has 6 or so weeks to save his career.
What the hell does that even mean? I mean they pick a undersized key forward who then has no Inside 50's to work with then use him in the ruck against one of the leagues biggest ruckman. If the AFL had Fair Work officers theyed be knocking on Richardsons door asking what the hell he is doing to Lee.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
Re: changes for next week
When is Hickey back?
Rather play two ruckman and have rest one forward above anyone who is a forward but doesn't care much.
Rather play two ruckman and have rest one forward above anyone who is a forward but doesn't care much.
Re: changes for next week
Andreous wrote:St Chris wrote:Ok, here goes. I was lying awake last night an came up with this gem.....
Out: Riewoldt
Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....
Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.
Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.
It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.
I like your left field thinking. The opposition will have to spend more than 2 minutes thinking about the Saints forward line also. If you recall the saints made a grand final after Locket left as well.
Do you think the Swans should drop Buddy so that the opposition think about the forward line a bit more. If Rooy was dropped or rested then the whole match committee should be sacked. Luckily neither will happen. Also Joey and dempster arent going to be dropped either to those who for some reason think they should.
Re: changes for next week
SainterK wrote:Move Nick elsewhere on the field, not off it completely
Why? Because he is the only one who looks like kicking goals? If Nick played elsewhere for the whole season i reckon we have won no games at all.
Re: changes for next week
Oh well, we're bottom anyway so that thought isn't as scary as you'd have it sound.plugger66 wrote:SainterK wrote:Move Nick elsewhere on the field, not off it completely
Why? Because he is the only one who looks like kicking goals? If Nick played elsewhere for the whole season i reckon we have won no games at all.
Silly not to prepare for life after him.