changes for next week

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5939
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471571Post samuraisaint »

terry smith rules wrote:ready to be howled down but

in

Maister

At least he competes, he knows how to position himself and can gets his hand on the ball
Why? We know what he brings to the team. He has had his goes at it. Someone else for mine.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
noob
Club Player
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 10:32am

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471579Post noob »

What about one of the ruckman? Pierce/Holmes? Can't be any worse than what has been dished up.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471598Post magnifisaint »

If Lee doesn't kick half a dozen at Sandy in the next few weeks then he's caput.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471601Post stinger »

savage and curren are definites...and probably stanley for lee......can't see saunders and jones staying in either....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8391
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1911 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471628Post WellardSaint »

Changes?
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.

Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471636Post saintspremiers »

WellardSaint wrote:Changes?
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.

Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.
I watched but sadly it was 2.5 hrs of my life I'll never get back.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Milne
Club Player
Posts: 1392
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:15pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 27 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471648Post Milne »

In: Hickey?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471679Post Con Gorozidis »

stinger wrote:savage and curren are definites...and probably stanley for lee......can't see saunders and jones staying in either....
What was wrong with Milera?

According to the saints.com.au

"In addition to this, Tom Lee, who had spent time in the ruck as well as up forward, was subbed prior to half-time, allowing Clint Jones to impact the game as an extra midfielder."

'impact the game' is a very generous description....


Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2394
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 273 times
Been thanked: 638 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471716Post Beno88 »

Time for a few senior players who are just plodding along to get a wake up call.

Out : Montagna, Dempster, Lee, Saunders, Jones, Longer (inj)

In : Stanley, Siposs, Gwilt, Savage, Milera, Curren

If Milera is still injured, then Markworth should get a crack.

Players like Dempster and Montagna are twice as talented and valuable as guys like Weller and Simpkin, but they look like they're playing with half the desire.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471722Post CURLY »

Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
BringBackMadDog
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1968
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471739Post BringBackMadDog »

Out Lee, Longer, Saunders, Dempster, Jones
In: Pierce, Stanley, Savage, Gwilt, Curran


User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471743Post St Chris »

Ok, here goes. I was lying awake last night an came up with this gem.....

Out: Riewoldt

Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....

Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.

Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.

It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.


Andreous
Club Player
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue 25 Jun 2013 12:56am

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471774Post Andreous »

St Chris wrote:Ok, here goes. I was lying awake last night an came up with this gem.....

Out: Riewoldt

Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....

Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.

Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.

It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.

I like your left field thinking. The opposition will have to spend more than 2 minutes thinking about the Saints forward line also. If you recall the saints made a grand final after Locket left as well.


terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2540
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 385 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471780Post terry smith rules »

CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
Two weeks ago when many were calling for Stanley to be out and be replaced by Lee, others said that is ridiculous to expect him at 194cm go in as a back up ruck and Saturday saw all those chickens come home to roost. He is a forward and should be played as such.


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2540
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 385 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471781Post terry smith rules »

CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
Two weeks ago when many were calling for Stanley to be out and be replaced by Lee, others said that is ridiculous to expect him at 194cm go in as a back up ruck and Saturday saw all those chickens come home to roost. He is a forward and should be played as such.


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471783Post magnifisaint »

WellardSaint wrote:Changes?
Didn't watch today, no foxtel and had family lunch.

Next week, game is on FTA so I can watch.
I'm sure your lunch would have been a lot nicer than watching the footy. I reckon having an in depth conversation with your mother in law would be far more appealing than watching the Saints play.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471786Post magnifisaint »

CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
Like the coach said his negatives outweighed his positives.
With a comment like that unless he has a contract for next year then he has 6 or so weeks to save his career.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1344 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471789Post CURLY »

magnifisaint wrote:
CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
Like the coach said his negatives outweighed his positives.
With a comment like that unless he has a contract for next year then he has 6 or so weeks to save his career.

What the hell does that even mean? I mean they pick a undersized key forward who then has no Inside 50's to work with then use him in the ruck against one of the leagues biggest ruckman. If the AFL had Fair Work officers theyed be knocking on Richardsons door asking what the hell he is doing to Lee.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471792Post SaintPav »

FQF wrote:Our transitional play from defence to offence is our major weakness and the source of many of our problems. If we could get Fisher, Wright, Gilbert and Roberton back into the line up, we'd look a lot better.

I wish Savage offered us something. We are ravaged with injury and here is a player who is supposedly decent who cannot get a game.
We struggled last year to get it out of the back half after losing both BJ and Gram.

This year we lost Dal plus those players you mentioned.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471795Post magnifisaint »

CURLY wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
CURLY wrote:Lee stays for me and is played in the position he was recruited to play. Ridiculous that he was made to ruck and at the same time impress.
Like the coach said his negatives outweighed his positives.
With a comment like that unless he has a contract for next year then he has 6 or so weeks to save his career.

What the hell does that even mean? I mean they pick a undersized key forward who then has no Inside 50's to work with then use him in the ruck against one of the leagues biggest ruckman. If the AFL had Fair Work officers theyed be knocking on Richardsons door asking what the hell he is doing to Lee.
It means he doesn't have much ticker


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471814Post SainterK »

When is Hickey back?

Rather play two ruckman and have rest one forward above anyone who is a forward but doesn't care much.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471815Post plugger66 »

Andreous wrote:
St Chris wrote:Ok, here goes. I was lying awake last night an came up with this gem.....

Out: Riewoldt

Now, for those who are still with me, let me explain....

Firstly it gives Nick a week to rest. Not that he particularly needs it, but "managing" older players is perfectly legitimate at this time of year.

Secondly, get Lee, Stanley and Siposs inside 50 and let them present as proper forwards, without the overbearing presence of Nick leaving them in the shadows. We need to find out if these guys are the answer for the future, which is really difficult to get a read on when you have a legend like Roo being the focal point. It will also require the midfielders to step up, because they will need to be smarter going inside 50, rather than the tunnel vision they seem to have right now.

It wasnt a coincedence that Lenny, Goddard and Montagna were All-Australians the year after Harvs retired. They previously had that strong foundation to lean on, and without that crutch, they stood up. We need to know if our young forwards can do the same.

I like your left field thinking. The opposition will have to spend more than 2 minutes thinking about the Saints forward line also. If you recall the saints made a grand final after Locket left as well.

Do you think the Swans should drop Buddy so that the opposition think about the forward line a bit more. If Rooy was dropped or rested then the whole match committee should be sacked. Luckily neither will happen. Also Joey and dempster arent going to be dropped either to those who for some reason think they should.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471833Post SainterK »

Move Nick elsewhere on the field, not off it completely


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471835Post plugger66 »

SainterK wrote:Move Nick elsewhere on the field, not off it completely

Why? Because he is the only one who looks like kicking goals? If Nick played elsewhere for the whole season i reckon we have won no games at all.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: changes for next week

Post: # 1471842Post SainterK »

plugger66 wrote:
SainterK wrote:Move Nick elsewhere on the field, not off it completely

Why? Because he is the only one who looks like kicking goals? If Nick played elsewhere for the whole season i reckon we have won no games at all.
Oh well, we're bottom anyway so that thought isn't as scary as you'd have it sound.

Silly not to prepare for life after him.


Post Reply