Match Thread - cats v saints
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
A team filled with kids with U/18 bodies and two superstars on the way out against arguably the best modern side.saintspremiers wrote:or not capable? not fit enough? ?plugger66 wrote:We just dont run.
Of course we're going to look slow/weak/lacking of skills. But this has to happen, we can't avoid putting games into the youngsters anymore and it's going to hurt.
Just stick with it because we have a lot of talent coming through.
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
Try not to complain about the umps so much recently but the cats have the rub on this one
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
Another terrible start. As a young and inexperienced team, I can understand us not being able to run out games, but we have been jumped in nearly every game, including the ones we've won. As Pauline Hanson might say, "please explain "!
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:15pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
happening every weekJimmy O'Dea wrote:Even though he does not have the talent we are very poorly coached. To continue to let them drop a spare across half back (Mackie most of the time) without pushing one back to ensere this does not happen is dissapointing.
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
That was a crap decision to give that fag the free kick. A point is all it deserved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
citywest wrote:That was a crap decision to give that fag the free kick. A point is all it deserved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thats the way.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
So what would you do?falka wrote:Defenders always a few m behind, sick of it
You are garbage - Enough said
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
FFS I hope Rooey belts someone. He's had a gutful of the umps. Don't blame him if he did.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
Not per camera surely? Someone is reaming the afl if so.plugger66 wrote:desertsaint wrote:Looked touched, but no bloody goal line camera - what's the point? Cost next to nothing to install one up on the goal post.
About 200K a ground apparently. Will have them next year i reckon.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3602
- Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
So its that simple is it?falka wrote:Stand right up their arse
You are garbage - Enough said
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
It won't change because of the following......2013 is 1999, 2014 is 2000, 2015 is 2001, 2016 is 2002. Simple as that.MC Gusto wrote:We are the least competitive team in the league and it is hard to see that changing next season
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
Yes, defenders are always looking to drop off, they lower their eyes and look what happens, due mainly to lack of pressure but how many marks inside 50 have they had?Bunk_Moreland wrote:So its that simple is it?falka wrote:Stand right up their arse
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
Yes, defenders are always looking to drop off, they lower their eyes and look what happens, due mainly to lack of pressure but how many marks inside 50 have they had?Bunk_Moreland wrote:So its that simple is it?falka wrote:Stand right up their arse
Re: Match Thread - cats v saints
citywest wrote:It won't change because of the following......2013 is 1999, 2014 is 2000, 2015 is 2001, 2016 is 2002. Simple as that.MC Gusto wrote:We are the least competitive team in the league and it is hard to see that changing next season
Stop it. You are giving me a headache.