How redacted is the AFL. Amateur hour again.
Maybe it was a legit goal but FFS use technology.
No goal line camera
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
No goal line camera
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
Jacks Back
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: No goal line camera
OMG. What is the point of a goal review for a touched on the line when there are no cameras ON THE f****** LINE!!!!!
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Re: No goal line camera
Was just going to post the same thing! Can anyone tell me why the goal umpires wear the camera on their hat in only some games and not every game? It's not good enough!
Re: No goal line camera
Afl amateur hour. Will be a point of hilarity for anyone new to watching the game, absolute shambles and makes the sport a joke
Re: No goal line camera
Forget the camera. How can the moron standing on the line not see it was touched on the line.
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: No goal line camera
he thought it was a goal but bozo umpire thought it may be touched before the line. how could bozo tell?Bazza1970 wrote:Forget the camera. How can the moron standing on the line not see it was touched on the line.
goal ump should tell bozo he was 100% sure and but out.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: No goal line camera
Well you look at channel 9 and the cricket, they've put a camera everywhere except in the ball and I don't imagine CA told them that it was required. Channel 7 needs to take some initiative including HD.
-
kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: No goal line camera
That's not what happened at all.saintspremiers wrote:he thought it was a goal but bozo umpire thought it may be touched before the line. how could bozo tell?Bazza1970 wrote:Forget the camera. How can the moron standing on the line not see it was touched on the line.
goal ump should tell bozo he was 100% sure and but out.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: No goal line camera
Same as the draw and the draft - it needs to be equal for all.
If Geelong/AFL can't supply a venue with the same cameras on the goal line as the G or Jihad then we shouldn't play there.
If Geelong/AFL can't supply a venue with the same cameras on the goal line as the G or Jihad then we shouldn't play there.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Re: No goal line camera
Enrico_Misso wrote:Same as the draw and the draft - it needs to be equal for all.
If Geelong/AFL can't supply a venue with the same cameras on the goal line as the G or Jihad then we shouldn't play there.
Well thats plainly silly. Just fix it and forget about not playing there. Nothing to do with Geelong by the way.