Now this is funny… when have we ever got the balance right?Cairnsman wrote:Just hoping we don't get the balance wrong.
great post legendary btw…
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Not quite, Sobraz. The "old PR chestnut" is merely a bonus, a side benefit, that we'd be crazy not to spruik. It's not "all" it comes back to, by any means.Sobraz wrote:So it all comes back to the old PR chestnut then by the sounds of things Tot.
Cogently and coherently presented, Leg.Legendary wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Would the Australian Womens Netball Team be ok with a male coach roaming through the change rooms. That's one problem I can see. Worth the experiment though if our budget doesn't allow us to employ the best available coaches at AFL level. I hope she succeeds.Sir, I hope you were born prior to 1940, because nothing else could explain the unconscious bias and ignorance you have demonstrated in your comments on this topic.Cairnsman wrote: She didn't play at AFL level and she has had minimal experience at AFL level and in particular under very experienced coaches within a very good system so I would guess there were better choices on that score. I think it is probably token and I think our weak financial situation probably doesn't allow us to pick the very best also.
To ask whether it is appropriate for a woman to be present in the St Kilda changing rooms is a baseless and ridiculous question. I have reported your post to the moderators.
At every football club from the Under 10's to AFL level, women are currently present in the change rooms as physiotherapists, doctors, trainers, board members, parents and supporters. Have you been inside the change rooms of a sporting club since 1950?
To label her appointment as token is to ignore her experience as a player and coach, the outstanding personal recommendations given by Gary Ayres and Stan Alves and the fact that she participated in two interviews. You are also making accusations against the club that they are not acting in the interests of their players by appointing the best person available to help them.
Has far north Queensland become so isolated in its cultural and social attitudes from the rest of this country that it is impossible to accept that a woman can have the ability, the experience, the wisdom and the track record to succeed as a coach at an AFL club?
We have had several senior coaches (Neil Craig, Wayne Brittain, Brendan McCartney and Brendan Bolton) and other assistants (our own Danny Sexton is one) who didn't play AFL at the highest level. And yet they all obtained their positions based on merit. Danny Sexton has been retained and promoted by three different senior coaches. Do you suggest that this was done based on something other than merit? If not, then your argument fails.
If you are so convinced that the skills required to succeed in football are found in the culture of the "men's club", please read what Gary Ayres and Stan Alves (I don't have to remind you of their credentials) have to say about Peta Searle:
Ayres:
"I believe she could knock over, without any problem whatsoever, a development coaching role within any AFL club.
Without a second’s hesitation, Ayres said there were many times when Searle cut through with young footballers in a manner he could not. “Yes, definitely. Through her approach, her communication and her manner.”
The former head coach of Geelong and Adelaide said he would recruit, or recommend, Searle to any club at any level of competition in the game."
Alves:
"At the AFL’s most recent annual national coaching conference in January, former St Kilda coach Stan Alves was blown away by Searle’s presentation on defence. “If she wasn’t the best, she was equal best to anyone who presented at the conference,” Alves said.
“I felt as if I was a player being coached. I came away from the whole thing thinking, ‘This girl can go the next step. She can be the groundbreaker.’"
Sorry I didn't get much past sir, anything that starts of that condescending bores me.Legendary wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Would the Australian Womens Netball Team be ok with a male coach roaming through the change rooms. That's one problem I can see. Worth the experiment though if our budget doesn't allow us to employ the best available coaches at AFL level. I hope she succeeds.Sir, I hope you were born prior to 1940, because nothing else could explain the unconscious bias and ignorance you have demonstrated in your comments on this topic.Cairnsman wrote: She didn't play at AFL level and she has had minimal experience at AFL level and in particular under very experienced coaches within a very good system so I would guess there were better choices on that score. I think it is probably token and I think our weak financial situation probably doesn't allow us to pick the very best also.
To ask whether it is appropriate for a woman to be present in the St Kilda changing rooms is a baseless and ridiculous question. I have reported your post to the moderators.
At every football club from the Under 10's to AFL level, women are currently present in the change rooms as physiotherapists, doctors, trainers, board members, parents and supporters. Have you been inside the change rooms of a sporting club since 1950?
To label her appointment as token is to ignore her experience as a player and coach, the outstanding personal recommendations given by Gary Ayres and Stan Alves and the fact that she participated in two interviews. You are also making accusations against the club that they are not acting in the interests of their players by appointing the best person available to help them.
Has far north Queensland become so isolated in its cultural and social attitudes from the rest of this country that it is impossible to accept that a woman can have the ability, the experience, the wisdom and the track record to succeed as a coach at an AFL club?
We have had several senior coaches (Neil Craig, Wayne Brittain, Brendan McCartney and Brendan Bolton) and other assistants (our own Danny Sexton is one) who didn't play AFL at the highest level. And yet they all obtained their positions based on merit. Danny Sexton has been retained and promoted by three different senior coaches. Do you suggest that this was done based on something other than merit? If not, then your argument fails.
If you are so convinced that the skills required to succeed in football are found in the culture of the "men's club", please read what Gary Ayres and Stan Alves (I don't have to remind you of their credentials) have to say about Peta Searle:
Ayres:
"I believe she could knock over, without any problem whatsoever, a development coaching role within any AFL club.
Without a second’s hesitation, Ayres said there were many times when Searle cut through with young footballers in a manner he could not. “Yes, definitely. Through her approach, her communication and her manner.”
The former head coach of Geelong and Adelaide said he would recruit, or recommend, Searle to any club at any level of competition in the game."
Alves:
"At the AFL’s most recent annual national coaching conference in January, former St Kilda coach Stan Alves was blown away by Searle’s presentation on defence. “If she wasn’t the best, she was equal best to anyone who presented at the conference,” Alves said.
“I felt as if I was a player being coached. I came away from the whole thing thinking, ‘This girl can go the next step. She can be the groundbreaker.’"
Well that is a good point. I hope we aren't over correcting. We have had a high staff turn over in the past 2 years and from my experience that can be catastrophic in an organisation that is already struggling. I really hope we get it right. I'm not hoping we get it wrong I can assure you of that. I can't say if Legendary's post was great, maybe the ending was, the beginning was less interesting than a boring golden book.dragit wrote:Now this is funny… when have we ever got the balance right?Cairnsman wrote:Just hoping we don't get the balance wrong.
great post legendary btw…
This is an additional position, not a turn-over…Cairnsman wrote:Well that is a good point. I hope we aren't over correcting. We have had a high staff turn over in the past 2 years and from my experience that can be catastrophic in an organisation that is already struggling. I really hope we get it right. I'm not hoping we get it wrong I can assure you of that. I can't say if Legendary's post was great, maybe the ending was, the beginning was less interesting than a boring golden book.dragit wrote:Now this is funny… when have we ever got the balance right?Cairnsman wrote:Just hoping we don't get the balance wrong.
great post legendary btw…
If a coherent reply to your comments bores you, will you read 2 sentences?Cairnsman wrote: Sorry I didn't get much past sir, anything that starts of that condescending bores me.
Sir,Legendary wrote:If a coherent reply to your comments bores you, will you read 2 sentences?Cairnsman wrote: Sorry I didn't get much past sir, anything that starts of that condescending bores me.
Your posts were ignorant, sexist, biased and demonstrated an attitude that belongs in the 1950's.
You made baseless allegations and inferences about Peta, our club and the culture of AFL football without any respect for women or their ability.
He started it!plugger66 wrote:I reported both of you for reported each other for silly little things. I also reported Steele Sidebottom.
Doc, that's the bleedin' obvious isn't it? However, a few seemed to have missed this.Dr Spaceman wrote:Surely none of this is relevant unless they're announcing today that she's replacing Richo
Great point Dragstar.The OtherThommo wrote:All true and valid, Dragit. But, given she's joining the ranks as a development coach, I reckon that's the right job, from a perspective of her background and to keep her performance assessment from being tied to win/loss ratios. The club management will be able to assess her away from the extra special scrutiny of the chattering classes who will look for reasons why her gender is antithetical to football coaching success.Dragstar wrote:Voss, Ratten, Primus, Watson etc etc… all champions on the playing field, didn't help them coach.
I wouldn't call Neil Craig's career a failure by any means… 177 games at a similar WIN/Loss to Sheedy.
If she performs up to the expectations of those who have engaged her services in a development role, then they and she can have increased confidence she can go forward, and withstand that "extra" scrutiny.
I reckon it's a terrific appointment. Let's face it, lots of spruiking about diversity means jot if you don't actually do some of it.
Just as an aside, and from the dregs of my memory, but I seem to recall the person who took the strongest stand at E'dope, about the jabfest, was a woman employed in their fitness and conditioning staff. Again from memory, I also seem to recall she either got the bullet for her protest, or quit in disgust. Maybe they should have listened to her, instead of the blind allegiance to the boys' club culture.
While there could well be some element of pleasing the AFL heirarchy with such an appointment, I actually enjoy a bit of differentiation. And, let's face it, one of the best routes out of our current malaise is to differentiate ourselves. If this move enables the AFL to hold us up as a good example, then great.
I hope she does bring a broader perspective to our player development, 'cos it can only help. And, I hope she gets to the chance to be both a development and developing coach.
That says it all K!SainterK wrote:Meh, don't get the fuss.
Solid appointment, great references.
Go saints!
From what I've heard and read about her, she seems very qualified and got the job on merit. The fact that we employed a woman to a male dominated role can only be great PR for the club and hence widen potential suitors for sponsorship.plugger66 wrote:3rd generation saint wrote:Can see nothing but positives with this appointment, may very well be what closes a big sponsorship deal.
I really hope that didnt cross anyones mind at the club otherwise we have some issues. I have no problem with the appointment if she is the best person for the job but being an assistant coach at St kevins this year and being backline coach at Port the previous year doesnt sound like a person who is ready for AFL footy. Must have interviewed very well.
What a condescending response by Cairnsman, well argued.Cairnsman wrote:Sorry I didn't get much past sir, anything that starts of that condescending bores me.Legendary wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Would the Australian Womens Netball Team be ok with a male coach roaming through the change rooms. That's one problem I can see. Worth the experiment though if our budget doesn't allow us to employ the best available coaches at AFL level. I hope she succeeds.Sir, I hope you were born prior to 1940, because nothing else could explain the unconscious bias and ignorance you have demonstrated in your comments on this topic.Cairnsman wrote: She didn't play at AFL level and she has had minimal experience at AFL level and in particular under very experienced coaches within a very good system so I would guess there were better choices on that score. I think it is probably token and I think our weak financial situation probably doesn't allow us to pick the very best also.
To ask whether it is appropriate for a woman to be present in the St Kilda changing rooms is a baseless and ridiculous question. I have reported your post to the moderators.
At every football club from the Under 10's to AFL level, women are currently present in the change rooms as physiotherapists, doctors, trainers, board members, parents and supporters. Have you been inside the change rooms of a sporting club since 1950?
To label her appointment as token is to ignore her experience as a player and coach, the outstanding personal recommendations given by Gary Ayres and Stan Alves and the fact that she participated in two interviews. You are also making accusations against the club that they are not acting in the interests of their players by appointing the best person available to help them.
Has far north Queensland become so isolated in its cultural and social attitudes from the rest of this country that it is impossible to accept that a woman can have the ability, the experience, the wisdom and the track record to succeed as a coach at an AFL club?
We have had several senior coaches (Neil Craig, Wayne Brittain, Brendan McCartney and Brendan Bolton) and other assistants (our own Danny Sexton is one) who didn't play AFL at the highest level. And yet they all obtained their positions based on merit. Danny Sexton has been retained and promoted by three different senior coaches. Do you suggest that this was done based on something other than merit? If not, then your argument fails.
If you are so convinced that the skills required to succeed in football are found in the culture of the "men's club", please read what Gary Ayres and Stan Alves (I don't have to remind you of their credentials) have to say about Peta Searle:
Ayres:
"I believe she could knock over, without any problem whatsoever, a development coaching role within any AFL club.
Without a second’s hesitation, Ayres said there were many times when Searle cut through with young footballers in a manner he could not. “Yes, definitely. Through her approach, her communication and her manner.”
The former head coach of Geelong and Adelaide said he would recruit, or recommend, Searle to any club at any level of competition in the game."
Alves:
"At the AFL’s most recent annual national coaching conference in January, former St Kilda coach Stan Alves was blown away by Searle’s presentation on defence. “If she wasn’t the best, she was equal best to anyone who presented at the conference,” Alves said.
“I felt as if I was a player being coached. I came away from the whole thing thinking, ‘This girl can go the next step. She can be the groundbreaker.’"
Sponsors also like good publicity, and this gives us plenty. GWS have great sponsors and they have won a total of 6 games in 3 seasons so far.Cairnsman wrote:It's got me stuffed why people think that employing a women is going to lead sponsors to our door. Sponsors want exposure and the only way we can improve that is by winning and getting better time slots and more of them. Agree that Peta's engagement is a good PR opportunity.
Plenty? I doubt it very much. She will bring some exposure but not the pot of gold you are suggesting. GWS have great sponsors because they are GWS and they are and will be guaranteed much more exposure than us.3rd generation saint wrote:Sponsors also like good publicity, and this gives us plenty. GWS have great sponsors and they have won a total of 6 games in 3 seasons so far.Cairnsman wrote:It's got me stuffed why people think that employing a women is going to lead sponsors to our door. Sponsors want exposure and the only way we can improve that is by winning and getting better time slots and more of them. Agree that Peta's engagement is a good PR opportunity.
Ah, but, SP, Richo went through the same process as Watters, at the same time, so he'd be well prepared to spot any Mr Ripley style presentations from Ms Searle, I'm sure.saintspremiers wrote:Talking of presentations - wasn't that what got Scotty Watters over the line?
Sounds like she has done everything possible to earn a chance as an assistant coach at AFL level.plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Would the Australian Womens Netball Team be ok with a male coach roaming through the change rooms. That's one problem I can see. Worth the experiment though if our budget doesn't allow us to employ the best available coaches at AFL level. I hope she succeeds.
Probably many female trainers involved in AFL teams. Certainly is with local footy and its no issue. Im more worried that she has the right credentials and it isnt just a token appointment. Backs coach at Port 2 years ago. is that really enough?