Con Gorozidis wrote:So what is your point plugger?
Fans have no right to whinge and the club is run by geniuses who are above criticism ?
How would you like to be married to it...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Con Gorozidis wrote:So what is your point plugger?
Fans have no right to whinge and the club is run by geniuses who are above criticism ?
Big man, have you factored in injuries? If so, we are close to rock bottom.BigMart wrote:What a load of apologist crap.
At times during the match we matched the intensity of Collingwood... Other times we did not...
If a team accepts 80-140 point losses as that ok, that's where we're at? What's the point of even fronting up weekly?!
That, and effort requires no experience or talent.
We pay our players up to 95% of what collingwood does.
So either we are butchering our list mgt, butchering the footy, lack in the footy dept or lack effort?
Collingwood were far from full strength either with Reid, Brown, Blair, Grundy, Swan, Ball missing and Max down early.
If they were 80pts better than us.... We are at rock bottom
With our best players still over 30
Yep...that is what happens with young inexperienced players.BigMart wrote:What a load of apologist crap.
At times during the match we matched the intensity of Collingwood... Other times we did not...
Depends on what your definition of the word accepts is.BigMart wrote:
If a team accepts 80-140 point losses as that ok, that's where we're at?
And how else would you propose to get senior games experience into young players?BigMart wrote:
What's the point of even fronting up weekly?!
BigMart wrote:What a load of apologist crap.
At times during the match we matched the intensity of Collingwood... Other times we did not...
If a team accepts 80-140 point losses as that ok, that's where we're at? What's the point of even fronting up weekly?!
That, and effort requires no experience or talent.
We pay our players up to 95% of what collingwood does.
So either we are butchering our list mgt, butchering the footy, lack in the footy dept or lack effort?
Collingwood were far from full strength either with Reid, Brown, Blair, Grundy, Swan, Ball missing and Max down early.
If they were 80pts better than us.... We are at rock bottom
With our best players still over 30
A comment like that deserves an automatic banning for one month.plugger66 wrote:BigMart wrote:What a load of apologist crap.
At times during the match we matched the intensity of Collingwood... Other times we did not...
If a team accepts 80-140 point losses as that ok, that's where we're at? What's the point of even fronting up weekly?!
That, and effort requires no experience or talent.
We pay our players up to 95% of what collingwood does.
So either we are butchering our list mgt, butchering the footy, lack in the footy dept or lack effort?
Collingwood were far from full strength either with Reid, Brown, Blair, Grundy, Swan, Ball missing and Max down early.
If they were 80pts better than us.... We are at rock bottom
With our best players still over 30
Are you serious? you really come accross as a poor loser. We pay 95% of the salary cap. Yep because thats the rules. i agree about apologist crap and I apologie for your crap. And what is your point anyway. Who is accepting big losses? I suppose its because i pointed out you have a go at Jack for taking advantage even though it was Ray and also for your pathetic comment about asking Stanley if he was weak c***. You make me sick.
Isn't trying to influence the mods an offence in itself? May be up for a ban yourself.........SaintPav wrote:A comment like that deserves an automatic banning for one month.plugger66 wrote:BigMart wrote:What a load of apologist crap.
At times during the match we matched the intensity of Collingwood... Other times we did not...
If a team accepts 80-140 point losses as that ok, that's where we're at? What's the point of even fronting up weekly?!
That, and effort requires no experience or talent.
We pay our players up to 95% of what collingwood does.
So either we are butchering our list mgt, butchering the footy, lack in the footy dept or lack effort?
Collingwood were far from full strength either with Reid, Brown, Blair, Grundy, Swan, Ball missing and Max down early.
If they were 80pts better than us.... We are at rock bottom
With our best players still over 30
Are you serious? you really come accross as a poor loser. We pay 95% of the salary cap. Yep because thats the rules. i agree about apologist crap and I apologie for your crap. And what is your point anyway. Who is accepting big losses? I suppose its because i pointed out you have a go at Jack for taking advantage even though it was Ray and also for your pathetic comment about asking Stanley if he was weak c***. You make me sick.
What a disgrace!
BigMart wrote:What a load of apologist crap.
At times during the match we matched the intensity of Collingwood... Other times we did not...
If a team accepts 80-140 point losses as that ok, that's where we're at? What's the point of even fronting up weekly?!
That, and effort requires no experience or talent.
We pay our players up to 95% of what collingwood does.
So either we are butchering our list mgt, butchering the footy, lack in the footy dept or lack effort?
Collingwood were far from full strength either with Reid, Brown, Blair, Grundy, Swan, Ball missing and Max down early.
If they were 80pts better than us.... We are at rock bottom
With our best players still over 30
Nah don't enjoy that, just continue to rue the fact that we gave away a decent ruckman instead & another 30 year old champ.gringo wrote:Just enjoy the glimmers of hope when guys like Billings and Dunstan get a little better each game and you will escape with your sanity intact.BigMart wrote:We are at rock bottom
oldie60 wrote:I know we have not recruited well in the past but is till don't believe that a few early draft picks will fix the problem. Our bottoming out had to be but then why don't clubs like Geelong,Collingwood and Hawthorn to an extent don't spiral to the depths we have in a short period of time.The reason is because the next rung of players below their elite are good footballers where as the difference between our best players to our mid range is players is massive even when you go back to our grand final years.Our recruiting has been ordinary over the past 10 years and you also have to question our inability to attract good players to our club.Early draft picks may help in the long term but some strong bodied experience will also need to be considered if we wish to not fall into oblivion.Memberships are down,crowds are already low due to a number of circumstances beyond the clubs control (prices) so its a vicious circle we must embrace.As to how its remedied how long is a piece of string. I do have one criticism of the coaching box is that when we are getting thrashed we don't seem to try anything different as far as structures go which also goes to show that maybe our coaches will take time to develope so basically we have to be patient and hope we can at least instill a mantra of effort at all times regardless of our skill or strength.
BigMart wrote:Do you enjoy the fact great players have left our club and gone to other clubs and enjoyed real success.
Is it not a pity, in fact for me gut wrenching to see saints champions singing other songs whilst we are at rock bottom.
Selling your soul for a promise is a huge risk, IMO some seem to think because we are at rock bottom, there is an inevitability that we will rise. In the current climate, it's no guarantee.
History says it hasen't worked in the past, and in fact most champions and coaches we have lost have went on to better things... That IMO is a shame.
You cannot deny we have had more champions go elsewhere, than any other...
If you are trying to develop players and a game structure and you know you're going to finish near the bottom, then what would be the point of throwing the players around just to save a few goals (or probably make us lose by more)? Why shouldn't the players learn how to play with each other in their given positions? Mo point putting Rooey or Sippo to full back and Delaney to full forward for example.oldie60 wrote:... I do have one criticism of the coaching box is that when we are getting thrashed we don't seem to try anything different as far as structures go which also goes to show that maybe our coaches will take time to develope so basically we have to be patient and hope we can at least instill a mantra of effort at all times regardless of our skill or strength.
Well aren't you trying to influence the mods?True Believer wrote:
Isn't trying to influence the mods an offence in itself? May be up for a ban yourself.........
Since the early 90s we have lost a lot of players...but we have also spent a time at the pointy end of the ladder. History says it has worked for the saints and I hope we keep evolving to get a better team.BigMart wrote:Do you enjoy the fact great players have left our club and gone to other clubs and enjoyed real success.
Is it not a pity, in fact for me gut wrenching to see saints champions singing other songs whilst we are at rock bottom.
Selling your soul for a promise is a huge risk, IMO some seem to think because we are at rock bottom, there is an inevitability that we will rise. In the current climate, it's no guarantee.
History says it hasen't worked in the past, and in fact most champions and coaches we have lost have went on to better things... That IMO is a shame.
You cannot deny we have had more champions go elsewhere, than any other...
Maybe you should devote some time to reading comprehension? I was asking a question, not trying to influence anyone. Maybe pull your head in.....SaintPav wrote:Well aren't you trying to influence the mods?True Believer wrote:
Isn't trying to influence the mods an offence in itself? May be up for a ban yourself.........
How's calling someone on a disgusting post a potential offence (sic)?
And why can you report posters then?
You obviously think it's ok to call a player a weak C***.
Possibly the dumbest post I have ever read on here.
A slow journey would definitely not be quicksaintsRrising wrote:When you play lots of kids you struggle.....
When you play lots of kids..and you have many better players our injured such as last night (including some of your best new kids), you struggle more.
With access to the best young talent in the land, it has taken the Suns many years to get where they are.
We are on a slow journey, and not a quick one.
Seriously happy feet, that statement above is most probably the most stupid statement I have ever seen on Saintsational. Please pull your head in for crying out loud. Football is so predictable now it's not funny......happy feet wrote:Nobody like to see our team lose by big margins but unfortunately you had better get used to it. The drafting of talent may have a lot to do with it, but the lack of financial resources available to the Club is an issue. Look at how Collingwood has been able to keep Luke Ball match fit. They certainly have been better at that than we were. This is probably due to the amount they have to spend in state of the art player preparation. The AFL is becoming a dichotomy of those that have and those that don't and we are in the latter category. When we drafted Roo, Kosi, Goddard et al, like many others, I thought this is now our time. We came so close. Now with the state of the game, at age 51 I honestly don't think I will see a Premiership win in my lifetime, and as I was only 3 in 1966, don't remember that one. I think we have to really seriously consider that our Club may fold, and I ave no confidence in the AFL in keeping the poorer clubs going. For what it's worth, I despair that our great game has changed so much and that in my opinion, has morphed from sport to mere entertainment. Ah, such is life.