stinger wrote:BigMart wrote:P66
So you're not saying taping is irrelevant? You're not say he was not injured?
What exactly are you saying?
And have I read correctly in you saying, you've never seen anyone injured, then play the next week, wrongly? I would suggest it happens often... And sometimes it is costly. Sometimes it is alright...
Eg. Nigel Lappin played in a GF with broken ribs.. Clearly injured, he had numerous jabs and played?
And you can't really comment on my life, you don't know me? So it would be a waste of time writing what you imagine you think it is, because all you know is I follow stk, married with kids, work in education, play and coach sport and live on the bay... And of course get stalked on the Internet by a bloke who follows StK and likes to believe he and only he can have an opinion about anything to do with the joint?!
You're on a high horse plugger, but no one on SS thinks you should be, except of course you... With the self proclaimed importance
You answered every point.... Poorly
eddy played injured in the 2010 grandfinal replay........i think everybody knows how sick dawson was the year before....as a teen i was in the saints rooms many many times both before games and at half time .....couldn't count the number of players i saw given pain killer injections.....if plugger is saying that players don't play injured...then that's crap......
P66 quotes, taken from earlier posts in this thread;
"Its obvious that no player in the AFL is probably 100%."
"He may not be 100% but im doubting many if any players are 100% after about 2 games of footy."
"Im sure Armo isnt 100%. Im sure Lenny isnt, Im sure Rooy and Joey arent."
Yet despite these repeated statements, BM wrote "And have I read correctly in you saying, you've never seen anyone injured, then play the next week, wrongly? I would suggest it happens often..."
BM either has serious comprehension problems or is trolling.
I suggest his refusal to quote is so he can make stuff up to prove his own arguments.
