Hickey breakout game
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Hickey breakout game
Saint 58,
I watched the game last night due to big boy playing... imo i thought Hickley won more taps today then Ben last night (before Ryder went down) i am not worried about losing big ben... think it worked out best for both clubs.. he looks great for the hawks and Hickley is really starting to shine for us.
I watched the game last night due to big boy playing... imo i thought Hickley won more taps today then Ben last night (before Ryder went down) i am not worried about losing big ben... think it worked out best for both clubs.. he looks great for the hawks and Hickley is really starting to shine for us.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
Re: Hickey breakout game
Aside from your P66 wars, I dont mind your posting BM. But that is a joke comment. Giles was basically a full time tall forward, often opposed to Gwilt. Rucked less than Stanley at a guess.BigMart wrote:How did Mummy and Giles play?
Mmm? I'd suggest they were ranked 1 & 2 for GWS
However, Hickey played a very good 'around the ground' game....
So in terms of Hickey v Mumford, I think it's blatantly clear Hickey won out. Significantly.
No harm is giving credit where it's due. The Hick was enormous today & has epic upside.
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Hickey breakout game
How dare you, JB. Our self appointed, resident expert is never wrong. He's a teacher, don't you know?joffaboy wrote:lol - in most posters here Hickey clearly outpointed Mumford.BigMart wrote:How did Mummy and Giles play?
Mmm? I'd suggest they were ranked 1 & 2 for GWS
However, Hickey played a very good 'around the ground' game....
Kicked three goals and prominent at both ends.
As someone pointed out nearly 50% hitouts to advantage, Mumford 25%.
You called him a gumby. You are clearly wrong
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Re: Hickey breakout game
Mumford is much better than that, but still he was well beaten today by Dean Cox err Tom Hickeydragit wrote:Poor mans warnock.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Saint 58
- Club Player
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:10am
- Location: Anywhere the Saints are playing in Melbourne
- Has thanked: 253 times
- Been thanked: 106 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
+1ShanghaiSaint wrote: ..... i am not worried about losing big ben... think it worked out best for both clubs.. he looks great for the hawks and Hickley is really starting to shine for us.
What you do for others will define your life.
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
Re: Hickey breakout game
No idea how Hickey played but if he lost the hit outs but kicked 3 goals and got kicks around the ground then he is exactly how i want a ruckman to play. Can we now forget hit outs. please.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13330
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
Much better than the dude the Pelican sent to the HawksThe Fireman wrote:Hickey is the real deal.
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Re: Hickey breakout game
Wayne42 wrote:Much better than the dude the Pelican sent to the HawksThe Fireman wrote:Hickey is the real deal.
I reckon the Hawks fan forum may think that dude is ok. Why do we need to knock the other guy. Why cant we be happy for both of them?
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
Who cares about opposition fan forums or opposition playersplugger66 wrote:Wayne42 wrote:Much better than the dude the Pelican sent to the HawksThe Fireman wrote:Hickey is the real deal.
I reckon the Hawks fan forum may think that dude is ok. Why do we need to knock the other guy. Why cant we be happy for both of them?
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Re: Hickey breakout game
Totally agree. Mac is a terrific pickup for the Hawks, Dunstan is playing good football for us. We have Acres to come and Savage while not setting the world on fire could be handy.plugger66 wrote:Wayne42 wrote:Much better than the dude the Pelican sent to the HawksThe Fireman wrote:Hickey is the real deal.
I reckon the Hawks fan forum may think that dude is ok. Why do we need to knock the other guy. Why cant we be happy for both of them?
Hickey filling the Mac void.
Everyone happy (except possibly one person)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Re: Hickey breakout game
Wayne42 wrote:Who cares about opposition fan forums or opposition playersplugger66 wrote:Wayne42 wrote:
Much better than the dude the Pelican sent to the Hawks
I reckon the Hawks fan forum may think that dude is ok. Why do we need to knock the other guy. Why cant we be happy for both of them?
I dont. You were the one who said it. You do realise that dont you?
Re: Hickey breakout game
The thing for me was hickey's willingness to push forward as well as push to the areas he was needed. He had presence.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3665 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
We have to remember that Hickey isn't a ruck entering his prime, he's a developing kid and he looked really good today.
He's improving.
Whilst he's not quite at the standard I want him to be at, he's showing signs that he will develop into one of the leagues premier rucks. McEvoy may be the better player at the moment but it really feels like a matter of time until Hickey overtakes him
what more can you want.
He's improving.
Whilst he's not quite at the standard I want him to be at, he's showing signs that he will develop into one of the leagues premier rucks. McEvoy may be the better player at the moment but it really feels like a matter of time until Hickey overtakes him
what more can you want.
Re: Hickey breakout game
skeptic wrote:We have to remember that Hickey isn't a ruck entering his prime, he's a developing kid and he looked really good today.
He's improving.
Whilst he's not quite at the standard I want him to be at, he's showing signs that he will develop into one of the leagues premier rucks. McEvoy may be the better player at the moment but it really feels like a matter of time until Hickey overtakes him
what more can you want.
Nothing at all but thats why you should never decide on players, especially ruckmen after 2 or 3 years.
Re: Hickey breakout game
effective hit out to advantages are the only stat that matters.plugger66 wrote:No idea how Hickey played but if he lost the hit outs but kicked 3 goals and got kicks around the ground then he is exactly how i want a ruckman to play. Can we now forget hit outs. please.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
Re: Hickey breakout game
Solar wrote:effective hit out to advantages are the only stat that matters.plugger66 wrote:No idea how Hickey played but if he lost the hit outs but kicked 3 goals and got kicks around the ground then he is exactly how i want a ruckman to play. Can we now forget hit outs. please.
They actually mean stuff all as well going by last years stats. A ruckman kicking goals, getting marks around the ground and using his body to create space means everything.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
Watch the gem he played well and his hit outs were very good.plugger66 wrote:Solar wrote:effective hit out to advantages are the only stat that matters.plugger66 wrote:No idea how Hickey played but if he lost the hit outs but kicked 3 goals and got kicks around the ground then he is exactly how i want a ruckman to play. Can we now forget hit outs. please.
They actually mean stuff all as well going by last years stats. A ruckman kicking goals, getting marks around the ground and using his body to create space means everything.
Ben never played a game like that IMO
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
Mummy played OK, Giles did OK up forward…not sure what Giles had to do with Hickey.BigMart wrote:How did Mummy and Giles play?
Mmm? I'd suggest they were ranked 1 & 2 for GWS
However, Hickey played a very good 'around the ground' game....
I reckon Hickey and Roo split the votes today, Ben was never in that company.
How did those contested marks look on the telly?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Hickey breakout game
I only watched it on telly.......... and those contested marks looked good to me maverickmaverick wrote:Mummy played OK, Giles did OK up forward…not sure what Giles had to do with Hickey.BigMart wrote:How did Mummy and Giles play?
Mmm? I'd suggest they were ranked 1 & 2 for GWS
However, Hickey played a very good 'around the ground' game....
I reckon Hickey and Roo split the votes today, Ben was never in that company.
How did those contested marks look on the telly?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:18am
- Location: Noble Park
Re: Hickey breakout game
Just love big 'Reg' Hickey. Slotted 3 goals for us today.
In honour of those who went before, in the dark and desperate years.