For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421881Post Teflon »

saintbrat wrote:Club was still deciding as early as this morning.....
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-11-27/j ... st-a-saint
It was Weller who won out, after impressing with his application over the past three weeks while training with the Saints.

"While Maverick is a much younger player than Darren, both would have complemented needs on our playing list and ultimately we felt that Maverick suited our needs in a more immediate capacity than Darren, having brought in Hickey last year and Longer this year," Pelchen said.

"We felt that we want to give them every opportunity to play at senior level consistently and hence why we made the decision we did
."
This is a smart club decision grounded in common sense to our current situation

It gives me hope

I fear had Watters stayed and had his way....Jolly would be on our list and his gravy train.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421884Post saintsRrising »

Sainternist wrote:Was a tad surprised we (nor any other club) didn't take Jolly in the draft this morning. Would have gone cheap, we'd have an experienced ruckman to show the younger talls (Hickey, Longer and Stanley) the ropes and potentially he could have evolved into a ruck coach for us a la Steven King a few years back.

Interested to know the main reasons why we gave the option of picking him up a swerve. The most obvious reason would be that he wouldn't be a long term acquisition. Do we now have a youth policy going in full swing much like the Stan Alves era?

Discuss.
1/ Sorry if you want a coach...you hire a coach!

2/ We are not in finals tilt mode we do not need experienced players on our rookie list as back-ups = we are wasting a rookie spot for no reason

3/ We have Hickey, Longer. Stanley )all of whom can play comfortably as No 1 ruck), Pierce and the Rookie Holmes = as we are in rebuild mode that is ample

4/ If we had picked him up playing him at either the Saints or Sandy would have interfered with developing he young rucks that we do have.
Last edited by saintsRrising on Wed 27 Nov 2013 11:12pm, edited 1 time in total.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421885Post The Fireman »

anyone who wears the black and white is tainted.

Maybe an exorcism for Banger....he hasn't played for them.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421889Post Dr Spaceman »

@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421893Post The Fireman »

Dr Spaceman wrote:@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r
gold..pure gold.


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421896Post savatage »

Dr Spaceman wrote:@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r
Move on with some dignity....!


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421897Post savatage »

ChelseaGuy wrote:Happy Saints made the call to develop the young talent. As noted by others. jolly adds little to the long term success of the club.
Agreed!


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421902Post dragit »

Dr Spaceman wrote:@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r
"Telling it like it is..."

Wow, he can't be too bright, won't do much for his future job prospects, some things are just better left unsaid.


User avatar
Waltzing St Kilda
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2179
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 363 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421903Post Waltzing St Kilda »

dragit wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r
"Telling it like it is..."

Wow, he can't be too bright, won't do much for his future job prospects, some things are just better left unsaid.

Darren Jolly = knobcoat. With extra cheese. Should be grateful to the Pies for parachuting him into a premiership side.


saintsrus
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sat 01 Oct 2005 5:10pm
Location: F.K.A. saintsforlife
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421907Post saintsrus »

Waltzing St Kilda wrote:
dragit wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r
"Telling it like it is..."

Wow, he can't be too bright, won't do much for his future job prospects, some things are just better left unsaid.

Darren Jolly = knobcoat. With extra cheese. Should be grateful to the Pies for parachuting him into a premiership side.
He sounds like one that we dont want at our club, seems to be disruptive


Before Im 85
Fidelis
Club Player
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun 07 Jan 2007 12:35am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421909Post Fidelis »

Interesting to me that while The Age runs an article this morning detailing Jolly's criticism of Buckley including this quote:

''Just the excuses he gave me in that meeting were all bulls*** and that was the hardest thing to stomach, that he was a coward, really. We had a problem. He had an issue with me and I had an issue with him. And I'm not the only one. There's a lot of players there that are in that same boat" http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/d ... z2lsR2ZXWe

Yet the Herald Sun, which also runs an article on Jolly, relates nothing of his spat with Buckley.

Either The Age have a scoop or the suspicion that the HS is Eddy's mouthpiece has just grown


Faithful Even Unto Death
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421913Post saintspremiers »

Looks like Princess Jolly will have to join another league.

WAFL?


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421915Post St Ick »

I think his manager killed his career when he came out and said something along the lines of Jolly wants to be #1 ruck and will play 18+ games for whoever takes him. That would've stunted the development of our kids, and it also showed he wasn't interested in being a mentor or a backup, he wanted it to be the Jolly.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421916Post Spinner »

Fair call to having his say.

Hope it doesn't affect his coaching prospects...


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421929Post The Fireman »

hi is just telling us something we already knew


resaintlee
Club Player
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed 21 Oct 2009 11:18am
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421936Post resaintlee »

Dr Spaceman wrote:@theagesport: Darren Jolly blasts Nathan Buckley as a 'coward' http://t.co/Zf6MV7X92r
Anyone who speaks like this about their past employment is bound to sooner or later be doing it about their new job. I am so glad we didn't take him as the negatives would certainly outweigh the positives.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10799
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 837 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421938Post ace »

dragit wrote:There just aren't enough spots on the list to have blokes that are primarily there for coaching purposes.
Exactly coaches don't need to be on playing lists, clogging up a place and having their pay included in the salary cap.
Jolly at this point in time may be a better ruckman than all of our potential ruckmen but we should never give him a game.
Our primary purpose is to teach the young guys by giving them game time and responsibility.

Hire him only as a coach.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421939Post magnifisaint »

Fidelis wrote:Interesting to me that while The Age runs an article this morning detailing Jolly's criticism of Buckley including this quote:

''Just the excuses he gave me in that meeting were all bulls*** and that was the hardest thing to stomach, that he was a coward, really. We had a problem. He had an issue with me and I had an issue with him. And I'm not the only one. There's a lot of players there that are in that same boat" http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/d ... z2lsR2ZXWe

Yet the Herald Sun, which also runs an article on Jolly, relates nothing of his spat with Buckley.

Either The Age have a scoop or the suspicion that the HS is Eddy's mouthpiece has just grown
The story is there http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/twotim ... 6769940335


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9151
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421941Post spert »

Pretty clear that Pelchin and probably Richo don't want delisted old players at the end of their career for any reason- Jolly is past it by a long way.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8391
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1911 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421956Post WellardSaint »

Wrong forum.
Should be in "Opposition & Other Sports"


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421957Post Teflon »

Thank fork Watters left

Vindication in this decision alone - Watters as Hun reports would've taken this turkey...... and I suspect is the reason TDL got on..... what a clown


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421958Post magnifisaint »

Watters didn't leave. He got thrown out.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8391
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1911 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421959Post WellardSaint »

Malthouse infected Watters with the disease of taking recycled players
that used to play for them in previous teams, who have no real prospects.
Like rummaging thru an op-shop for a cheap bargain.
TDL from WAFL
Malthouse took Dale Thomas with ongoing medical issues


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421961Post SaintPav »

plugger66 wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:Heard that idiot Denham have another crack at the Saints on SEN this morning.

Discussing where Jolly may end up Denham mentioned us but now said it would be Esssendon or nothing because "St Kilda stuffed up". Poor communications with his management following Watters departure apparently.

Maybe we just lost interst in him. Maybe Watters was the one pushing for him. Maybe Longer coming on board meant we no longer needed him? Who knows?

But if we "stuffed up" then I'm glad we "stuffed up". Like many others I didn't want him at Seaford.

Anyway, move on Denham :roll:

That was exactly how I thought. Wish someone would ring him tomorrow and ask if all other 17 clubs stuffed up or were all 18 smart enough to say no.
It was implied that we stuffed him around as we only told him last minute that we were not taking him.

It’s probably standard practice by clubs to keep selections under wraps as no one wants to give anything away.

Saad was also probably told at the last minute that he wasn't going to get picked up and he was a St Kilda player.

It's easier to go with we’re a rabble etc. etc…


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: For he's (not) a Jolly good fellow?

Post: # 1421964Post stinger »

saintbrat wrote:Club was still deciding as early as this morning.....
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-11-27/j ... st-a-saint
It was Weller who won out, after impressing with his application over the past three weeks while training with the Saints.

"While Maverick is a much younger player than Darren, both would have complemented needs on our playing list and ultimately we felt that Maverick suited our needs in a more immediate capacity than Darren, having brought in Hickey last year and Longer this year," Pelchen said.

"We felt that we want to give them every opportunity to play at senior level consistently and hence why we made the decision we did
."
makes sense to me...


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Post Reply