Matt Scharenberg

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

spot on
Club Player
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 9:09pm

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417219Post spot on »

on the herald sun there is a 'pick me' on jack billings that will most likely be up tonight, im looking forward to seeing it


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417225Post plugger66 »

Old Mate wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
It seems to be common knowledge now that GWS will select Kelly with pick 2. And they don't have any reason to lie about their intentions holding those two picks and then their next at pick 14.

Kelly looks a little outside for my liking and Aish doesn't seem to get a lot of the ball. For those reasons I'd have them both on the lower end of the top 5. Boyd, Sharenberg, Billings, Kelly and then Aish.

I reckon we are getting Billings for sure. Dont like it but I reckon there is no way we will get Sharenberg. The pies will get him.
I agree. Everything I'm reading from those in the know (Emma Quayle, Shifter and Callum Twomey) have us linked with Billings. When Bains was asked on TWR about the top few selections he flat out said Boyd and Kelly will be at GWS so they wouldn't even be on our radar (we all knew that about Boyd months ago).

I really rate Billings, he offers a point of difference in a few key areas. Elite skills, fantastic mark for his size and match-winning ability. I guess we wait and see if that translates to AFL level but I suspect it will. The other question mark is if he can become a midfielder. I think he can but I wouldn't be unhappy if he doesn't. He'd be the type of forward that regularly gets 20+ disposals and has a say in plenty of goals whether setting them up or kicking them himself. I'd be close to equally as happy with Sharenberg or Billings at #3.

Im an Aish man. A pure mid. Small forwards dont work in ordinary sides and I know we will eventually come good again but I worry about Billings whan we are really struggling. Milne has been a star for years and because of how much we struggled this year looked ordinary. Imagine how hard it will be for Billings in the next 2 to 3 years. Im also of the school that mids win games these days. The rest of the team rely on how good or bad your mids are.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417234Post Old Mate »

plugger66 wrote:
Im an Aish man. A pure mid. Small forwards dont work in ordinary sides and I know we will eventually come good again but I worry about Billings whan we are really struggling. Milne has been a star for years and because of how much we struggled this year looked ordinary. Imagine how hard it will be for Billings in the next 2 to 3 years. Im also of the school that mids win games these days. The rest of the team rely on how good or bad your mids are.

I use to be on the Aish bandwagon but for me he's been underwhelming this year. He has had his injury concerns but I reckon there's more to it. Another thing about Aish, I don't see him as a pure midfielder. Not the type that can go into the middle and change a game anyway. I see him more as a creme on top kinda guy that will play most of his footy on a back flank or wing. I just can't see him transitioning into an inside midfielder. I reckon Kelly will develop more inside than Aish. Very nice player though just not in the best three IMO.

I wouldn't compare Milne with Billings. They're not similar types IMO. While I admit Milne has added a few extra strings to his bow in the last three years (since Roo had the bad hammy injury). I still see Milne as a one-trick pony. An old fashioned small forward who plays deep and is that natural crumber. Billings on the other hand looks more like a young Dangerfield (when he played exclusively forward) where he is a real marking threat up forward and is athletically gifted (something Milne is not). Schnieder is another worthy comparison however Schnieder rarely having a full pre-season has hampered his endurance to become a midfielder.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417256Post Wayne42 »

plugger66 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
Eastern wrote:
My Top 5

Boyd

Kelly

Scharenberg

Billings

Aish

Anyone who can accurately pick #2-#5 in order is A VERY GOOD GUESS


One that I'd like to see slide to #18 is Sheed !!
It seems to be common knowledge now that GWS will select Kelly with pick 2. And they don't have any reason to lie about their intentions holding those two picks and then their next at pick 14.

Kelly looks a little outside for my liking and Aish doesn't seem to get a lot of the ball. For those reasons I'd have them both on the lower end of the top 5. Boyd, Sharenberg, Billings, Kelly and then Aish.

I reckon we are getting Billings for sure. Dont like it but I reckon there is no way we will get Sharenberg. The pies will get him.
Stands to reason, especially if you think pick 6 comes before pick 3


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417258Post plugger66 »

Wayne42 wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
It seems to be common knowledge now that GWS will select Kelly with pick 2. And they don't have any reason to lie about their intentions holding those two picks and then their next at pick 14.

Kelly looks a little outside for my liking and Aish doesn't seem to get a lot of the ball. For those reasons I'd have them both on the lower end of the top 5. Boyd, Sharenberg, Billings, Kelly and then Aish.

I reckon we are getting Billings for sure. Dont like it but I reckon there is no way we will get Sharenberg. The pies will get him.
Stands to reason, especially if you think pick 6 comes before pick 3

Well it must in this case because i reckon both predictions will be right. We arent used to you saying anything of note. Do have anything at all on this? Surprise us.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417259Post Old Mate »

I got what you said plugger. We'll overlook Sharenberg and the Pies will pounce.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417267Post Wayne42 »

Old Mate wrote:I got what you said plugger. We'll overlook Sharenberg and the Pies will pounce.
if we overlook him then obviously we didn't rate him.... no loss

I'll go on what the club does rather than the word of someone who continually has to plead his Bona Fides


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417270Post Old Mate »

Wayne42 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:I got what you said plugger. We'll overlook Sharenberg and the Pies will pounce.
if we overlook him then obviously we didn't rate him.... no loss

I'll go on what the club does rather than the word of someone who continually has to plead his Bona Fides
We may as well not have an opinion then. Why bother having a discussion forum?


User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5862
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417273Post Dave McNamara »

Old Mate wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
It seems to be common knowledge now that GWS will select Kelly with pick 2. And they don't have any reason to lie about their intentions holding those two picks and then their next at pick 14.

Kelly looks a little outside for my liking and Aish doesn't seem to get a lot of the ball. For those reasons I'd have them both on the lower end of the top 5. Boyd, Sharenberg, Billings, Kelly and then Aish.

I reckon we are getting Billings for sure. Dont like it but I reckon there is no way we will get Sharenberg. The pies will get him.
I agree. Everything I'm reading from those in the know (Emma Quayle, Shifter and Callum Twomey) have us linked with Billings. When Bains was asked on TWR about the top few selections he flat out said Boyd and Kelly will be at GWS so they wouldn't even be on our radar (we all knew that about Boyd months ago).

I really rate Billings, he offers a point of difference in a few key areas. Elite skills, fantastic mark for his size and match-winning ability. I guess we wait and see if that translates to AFL level but I suspect it will. The other question mark is if he can become a midfielder. I think he can but I wouldn't be unhappy if he doesn't. He'd be the type of forward that regularly gets 20+ disposals and has a say in plenty of goals whether setting them up or kicking them himself. I'd be close to equally as happy with Sharenberg or Billings at #3.
I really really hope we get Billings. Goal kicking forward who can play mid field is stamped all over him. He's the 'match-winner' type IMHO.

That said, as Old Mate implied... Shazza' would be a bloody good consolation prize though.

No(!) and no(!) to Kelly and Aish. Highly skilled, but too lightly framed to impact in the AFL... think Aaron Fiora...


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2190
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 187 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417290Post Zed »

Old Mate wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Im an Aish man. A pure mid. Small forwards dont work in ordinary sides and I know we will eventually come good again but I worry about Billings whan we are really struggling. Milne has been a star for years and because of how much we struggled this year looked ordinary. Imagine how hard it will be for Billings in the next 2 to 3 years. Im also of the school that mids win games these days. The rest of the team rely on how good or bad your mids are.

I use to be on the Aish bandwagon but for me he's been underwhelming this year. He has had his injury concerns but I reckon there's more to it. Another thing about Aish, I don't see him as a pure midfielder. Not the type that can go into the middle and change a game anyway. I see him more as a creme on top kinda guy that will play most of his footy on a back flank or wing. I just can't see him transitioning into an inside midfielder. I reckon Kelly will develop more inside than Aish. Very nice player though just not in the best three IMO.

I wouldn't compare Milne with Billings. They're not similar types IMO. While I admit Milne has added a few extra strings to his bow in the last three years (since Roo had the bad hammy injury). I still see Milne as a one-trick pony. An old fashioned small forward who plays deep and is that natural crumber. Billings on the other hand looks more like a young Dangerfield (when he played exclusively forward) where he is a real marking threat up forward and is athletically gifted (something Milne is not). Schnieder is another worthy comparison however Schnieder rarely having a full pre-season has hampered his endurance to become a midfielder.
Dal and Joey never really transitioned to inside mids either but both were elite mids. Aish has elite kicking skills and exceptional decision making much like Dal - but with Montagna's ability to run and chase. If Aish slides to Gold Coast at 5, then I'd be willing to bet that once Gazza retires that Aish will start collecting really high disposal numbers because he will have a quality midfield to feed him. Aish, Omeara, Martin, bennel, Swallow .. if that happens they will be very very good.


“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417294Post Eastern »

Why ARGUE? We're all GUESSING !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417295Post Old Mate »

I like Aish but if his junior and SANFL career is anything to go by he won't be a ball winner. Joey and Dal Santo when in form are ball winners and can play inside very well. Aish more your smooth moving outside mid. Perhaps he goes on to play a similar role to a Daniel Wells but he's not in the same conversation as Ablett or O'Meara.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417345Post Wayne42 »

Old Mate wrote:
Wayne42 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:I got what you said plugger. We'll overlook Sharenberg and the Pies will pounce.
if we overlook him then obviously we didn't rate him.... no loss

I'll go on what the club does rather than the word of someone who continually has to plead his Bona Fides
We may as well not have an opinion then. Why bother having a discussion forum?
To voice opinions, we don't have to agree with them though and we can definitely voice that bit and then sit back and watch how people react


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417348Post dragit »

Wayne42 wrote: To voice opinions, we don't have to agree with them though and we can definitely voice that bit and then sit back and watch how people react
If you are not bobmurray, then you two should really catch up and voice no opinion at all.



Though I am sure you are the same person.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417351Post BigMart »

He looks a great player...

Doesn't fit our needs, except being a gun!


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417386Post Wayne42 »

dragit wrote:
Wayne42 wrote: To voice opinions, we don't have to agree with them though and we can definitely voice that bit and then sit back and watch how people react
If you are not bobmurray, then you two should really catch up and voice no opinion at all.



Though I am sure you are the same person.
You have no trouble voicing your opinions....often

And No...i am not him


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417389Post dragit »

Wayne42 wrote:
dragit wrote:
Wayne42 wrote: To voice opinions, we don't have to agree with them though and we can definitely voice that bit and then sit back and watch how people react
If you are not bobmurray, then you two should really catch up and voice no opinion at all.



Though I am sure you are the same person.
You have no trouble voicing your opinions....often

And No...i am not him
twins?


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417422Post maverick »

plugger66 wrote:
Im an Aish man. A pure mid. Small forwards dont work in ordinary sides and I know we will eventually come good again but I worry about Billings whan we are really struggling. Milne has been a star for years and because of how much we struggled this year looked ordinary. Imagine how hard it will be for Billings in the next 2 to 3 years. Im also of the school that mids win games these days. The rest of the team rely on how good or bad your mids are.
I know what you are saying, but Billings isn't a Milne type small forward who plays deep.
He plays as a high half forward who runs between the arcs and drifts deep forward.
I reckon he is very similar to Stevie J.
I have watched him a bit, admittedly on TV, but I like him a lot, I reckon he will be good for us.
It's been a while since we have had a smart young footballer...

I look at the Hawks list, and dispel your theory of top drafted mids...their highest is Lewis at 7....

I want Billings.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417575Post Con Gorozidis »

Billings looks awesome.
Looks like a marc murphy to me (not as big or tough as stevie j)
I think billings is a mid who played fwd in 2013 only because he had bursitis

Still reckon Scharenberg slightly ahead though....

Ill be happy with either but if Scharenberg slips to pick 5 or 6 someone will get a gun. He could easily be number 1.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417622Post Con Gorozidis »

Has anyone read footy tragic's draft top 50 over on Bigfooty?

The level of detail and work is truly staggering. Has to be seen to be believed...

Anyways he has Boyd Sheed Scharenberg Kelly Billings - as his order of rating - this is based on his ranking of ability - not the order he thinks they will actually go. He has Aish at 12.

Anyway - check it out for yourselves if you have a lazy few hours to spare...

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/f ... e.1040150/


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417784Post bergholt »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Has anyone read footy tragic's draft top 50 over on Bigfooty?

The level of detail and work is truly staggering. Has to be seen to be believed...
Yeah, it's a good one.

He doesn't think much of Hartung:

"He backs himself to run through and around anyone and I think what was his greatest asset in the U/18’s might be his greatest downfall in the AFL. Hartung does not care, he’ll just take you on, which is great and shows confidence, but at what cost? He very much puts the blinkers on and again if you want to compare him to Brent Harvey, it just won’t cut it. Hartung’s finishing skills are nowhere near Harvey’s and nor is his game sense or ability to bring teammates into the game. He plays the game likes it’s all about Billy and that will only be successful in the lower grades, especially when you’re standing at 178cm and 67kg."

Sounds a fair bit like Tommy Ledger.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417787Post matrix »

guy at my work is mattys uncle
says he gave up a promising career in baseball in the states to stick with footy in australia
couldnt understand it himself as the money would be crazy over there, but said the kid absolutely loves his footy and is a versatile player that can go back and forward
also said he thought there was quite a few better players that will go before him but is having a stab and says he should go top 5 for sure
be nice if he comes to the saints
i might be able to scam some free s*** :P


SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 998
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417799Post SinCitySainter »

Scharenburg could be a replacement for Sam Fisher and Billings could be the next Stevie J.

I would be happy with either of those results from a pick 3.


Megamaguire
Club Player
Posts: 1365
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:40pm
Location: Mitcham

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417873Post Megamaguire »

What a tough nut to crack is this one . No doubt in years to come Billings and Shazza ( throw in Aish & Kel too) will be compared in regard to what they have given to their prospective clubs.
Just like Richmond overlooking Buddy for ............ can't remember his name. Judd v's Ball is the other comparison that comes to mind - Ball the real solid mid and Judd the sprint and carry with after-burners .


The boy can play and we can build a defence around him that will have respect.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Matt Scharenberg

Post: # 1417876Post stinger »

Wayne42 wrote:
Old Mate wrote:I got what you said plugger. We'll overlook Sharenberg and the Pies will pounce.
if we overlook him then obviously we didn't rate him.... no loss

I'll go on what the club does rather than the word of someone who continually has to plead his Bona Fides
yep...just like the club didn't rate roo's cousin, jack, rioli or darling......


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Post Reply