I prefer the Fox Song. It's brilliant. 182 million YouTube hits. It would've won Eurovision had the timing been different. Love the 80's euro-beat in the last half of the song. Very Scandinavian.loris wrote:"Ning, ninggy, ne, ning ning, ning ............................. love that ridiculous songsaintspremiers wrote:
Let's get ridiculous!
(What would the fox say?)
Sack Peter Summers!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
Heard Watters was going to take the Captaincy of Rooey and this did not sit well with the leadership group!?
PADDLEPOP1000
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
i've told him that in the past...unfortunately he doesn't listen....SaintPav wrote:David, your posts give me a headache. Too busy for a start..
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- AccidentallyTim
- Club Player
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun 10 Jan 2010 9:21pm
- Location: -41.426253°
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
Are you Dermott Brereton?Dave McNamara wrote:What a BS performance that presser was!!! But it's worse than that.
Yes, we need to move on, yes we need to highlight the many positives, yes we need to highlight that the club is actually still going forward..., but, if you gloss over and fail to learn from the mistakes of history...
When Ro$$y was under pressure early on Right-said-Greg backed him... and did actually back him.
Seems that just three weeks ago our new boy assured Cuddles that he was wanted as our long-term coach. See a key difference? What has changed?
Peter Summers must come clean!
If there is a good reason for breaking his assurance and ousting Cuddles... tell us!
Don't go hiding behind a confidentiality clause that's no doubt been inserted in Cuddle's pay-put contract!
Coward!!!!
Unless Peter Summers can provide us with valid reasons for his not fulfilling his undertaking to Cuddles, then how the hell can we expect anyone going forward to now trust our club?
Can't Peter Summers see the on-going damage he doing to our club??? Fix it now Peter!!!
Peter, you must explain. Put up... or get out!!!!
Fortius Quo Fidelius
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
Just because he isn't talking about it doesn't mean he is glossing over anythingDave McNamara wrote:What a BS performance that presser was!!! But it's worse than that.
Yes, we need to move on, yes we need to highlight the many positives, yes we need to highlight that the club is actually still going forward..., but, if you gloss over and fail to learn from the mistakes of history...
Why??Peter Summers must come clean!
If the confidentiality clause has "no doubt" been inserted then both sides need to respect it.If there is a good reason for breaking his assurance and ousting Cuddles... tell us!
Don't go hiding behind a confidentiality clause that's no doubt been inserted in Cuddle's pay-put contract!
I think you will find that this is the start of the fix.Can't Peter Summers see the on-going damage he doing to our club??? Fix it now Peter!!!
Why because you want him to? He doesn't have to do anything actually.Peter, you must explain. Put up... or get out!!!!
And get rid of the freakin' colours!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9153
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
At the end of the day, the club has decided Watters is not going to be the coach, and has let him go- and I'm sure they would have liked nothing better than not to have to go through any of this. From a financial, ethical, business etc etc aspect it is not desirable at all- especially given the precarious situation the club is in as far as reputation and finances..
There must have been very serious issues that has brought this to a head and it has clearly been bubbling for a while. I just see the club as removing what they regard as either a disruptive or totally under-performing employee for the good of its wider interests...can't be anything else.
There must have been very serious issues that has brought this to a head and it has clearly been bubbling for a while. I just see the club as removing what they regard as either a disruptive or totally under-performing employee for the good of its wider interests...can't be anything else.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4642
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
Exactly.spert wrote:At the end of the day, the club has decided Watters is not going to be the coach, and has let him go- and I'm sure they would have liked nothing better than not to have to go through any of this. From a financial, ethical, business etc etc aspect it is not desirable at all- especially given the precarious situation the club is in as far as reputation and finances..
There must have been very serious issues that has brought this to a head and it has clearly been bubbling for a while. I just see the club as removing what they regard as either a disruptive or totally under-performing employee for the good of its wider interests...can't be anything else.
Re: Sack Peter Summers!
Not only busy, but half the time he posts I have no idea what he's talking about because he insists on using absurd nicknames for people and clubs.stinger wrote:i've told him that in the past...unfortunately he doesn't listen....SaintPav wrote:David, your posts give me a headache. Too busy for a start..