Conspiracy Theory on timing of Watters sacking

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8395
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1913 times
Been thanked: 890 times

Re: Conspiracy Theory on timing of Watters sacking

Post: # 1412866Post WellardSaint »

Andrew Plympton went early with the sacking.
Was quoted at the time "I'm here with Leading Teams" and he was sitting next to Frankie Peckett from Leading Teams.
The irony is that Leading Teams was set up in the early 90's (check their website) and they approached the Saints' brass to sell the idea. Stan Alves listened and embraced their concepts.
Alves first user of Leading Teams.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Conspiracy Theory on timing of Watters sacking

Post: # 1412911Post saintspremiers »

Eastern wrote:If the interview with SEN this morning is anything to go by, he is lucky to have lasted this long. What was he thinking by going ahead with the interview AFTER he was told NOT TO? !!
He's a dhead. I think that's clear.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Conspiracy Theory on timing of Watters sacking

Post: # 1413118Post Con Gorozidis »

So according to the Aus the Ashley Prescott appointment was the final straw
SW hired a head Asst and replacement for Laidley without consulting anyone.

I assume that means the contract is void ?
How will this work ?
Bizarre if Ashley has signed something and Scott signed something.


Post Reply