Pick 24-19 swap

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406242Post st.byron »

Old Mate wrote:It will be 24 & 59 for 19. Will get done next week.
What will be 24 and 59 for 19?


St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406243Post St Ick »

Old Mate wrote:It will be 24 & 59 for 19. Will get done next week.
Good deals. :D 59 won't be used on a live pick I wouldn't have thought so its a good deal for us.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406245Post fugazi »

North had better not screw us on the Delaney deal.

Why couldn't we have had that deal done first and the FA done second????

Now we have to hope they honour the spirit of the deal.....and we're talking about dealing with a Kray brother here


Nee!
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406246Post Old Mate »

st.byron wrote:
Old Mate wrote:It will be 24 & 59 for 19. Will get done next week.
What will be 24 and 59 for 19?
We swap our current 23 & 59 picks for Haw pick 19.


User avatar
karnaby
Club Player
Posts: 1376
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 2:41am

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406265Post karnaby »

Just for the record, here is the 1st 25 of the current Draft order list from the afl:
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-10-18/draft-order



1. GWS
2. GWS (received from Melbourne as part of trade for Dom Tyson)
3. St Kilda
4. Western Bulldogs
5. Gold Coast
6. West Coast
7. Brisbane Lions
8. North Melbourne
9. Melbourne (received from GWS as part of trade involving Dom Tyson)
10. Collingwood
11. Collingwood (free agency compensation pick received for Dale Thomas)
12. Richmond
13. Carlton
14. Port Adelaide
15. Sydney Swans
16. Geelong
17. Fremantle
18. St Kilda (received from Hawthorn as part of trade for Ben McEvoy)
19. Hawthorn (free agency compensation pick received for Lance Franklin)

20. Gold Coast

21. GWS
22. GWS (received from Melbourne as part of trade for Dom Tyson)
23. Adelaide (received from Melbourne for Bernie Vince; free agency compensation pick for Colin Sylvia)
24. St Kilda
25. St Kilda (free agency compensation pick received for Nick Dal Santo)


If we trade 24 & 59 for 19 as stated above we will then have 3, 18, 19, 25, 41, 77, 95 & 113


It's a shame ignorance isn't painful
Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406346Post Playon »

SinCitySainter wrote:If they had struck up a deal it would have been done already.
The fact that it didn't eventuate immediately Dal went to North indicates that no such deal is in place.
The only deal was probably North saying "go on let us have Dal we will be nice. Promise."
It should of been ok we'll list dal as a free agent but we want Delaney at pick 70 odd after he's be listed.
Otherwise we'll match any offer you'd like, we have the salary space and Dal gets another 3 year deal.

Brayshaws been in his ear for sure, just a matter of for how long.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406347Post saintsRrising »

Old Mate wrote:It will be 24 & 59 for 19. Will get done next week.

If we are planning to swap 25 for Longer, would giving the Hawks 24 allow them to underbid us?


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406352Post Old Mate »

saintsRrising wrote:
Old Mate wrote:It will be 24 & 59 for 19. Will get done next week.

If we are planning to swap 25 for Longer, would giving the Hawks 24 allow them to underbid us?
Never say never but they have publicly said they are no longer in the market for him. I suspect pick 24 or 25 won't get the deal done in any case. I see us using 18 or 19 or a variety of picks (18 & 25 for Longer & 29).

Longer is a special talent, very similar in style to Dean Cox. I'd have him in the 10-15 range so no dramas giving up pick 18 and an upgrade. Either way we are in for a bargain and the Lions are getting reamed with this potential trade and others.

I don't buy into that we must keep all our top 25 picks for the draft when a player such as Longer is available who only turned 20 this year and is not far off this years draftees age.


PJ
SS Life Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2008 10:31am
Location: Adelaide

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406411Post PJ »

I want Longer too but I would thought giving up 18 would be poor work given what will undoubtedly be available in midfield talent.


I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
User avatar
BackFromUSA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406544Post BackFromUSA »

Please note BigMart vs Plugger66, True Believer, JoffaBoy et al has been moved to Animal Enclosure for further mindless and pointless bickering. Please stay on topic here.


AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)

"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Pick 24-19 swap

Post: # 1406563Post joffaboy »

The bickering wasn't mndless.

It was factual from my part, but understand the move.


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Post Reply