McEvoy to Hawthorn

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400901Post savatage »

dragit wrote:Is Steve Salopek still available?
He was a Saints supporter!!!! Let's do it!!


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400903Post joffaboy »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
joffaboy wrote: My source tells me Giles and Cameron as well
Plus the rights to Israel Folau should he ever decide to return to the AFL :P
Now you are being silly. Its the rights to Sonny Bill williams


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400904Post Old Mate »

dragit wrote:I heard that we are shopping Gilbert & pick 21 to GWS for Tyson & Bruce…
I'd jump at that. Legit?


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400905Post gringo »

Old Mate wrote:
dragit wrote:I heard that we are shopping Gilbert & pick 21 to GWS for Tyson & Bruce…
I'd jump at that. Legit?

They would win we would win but I think Gilbert is a keeper as he fit our age profile personally. Dom Tyson was meant to get to the Tigers last year.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400906Post Wayne42 »

3 pages and still no Saints trades have been done, boy it's going to be a long month...

potentially, we will have swapped the whole list by the end of October...


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400910Post saintbrat »

gringo wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
dragit wrote:I heard that we are shopping Gilbert & pick 21 to GWS for Tyson & Bruce…
I'd jump at that. Legit?

They would win we would win but I think Gilbert is a keeper as he fit our age profile personally. Dom Tyson was meant to get to the Tigers last year.

ah people reading H-s
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 6735645562


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400912Post fugazi »

So we trade out our only experienced ruckman, with a huge tank and great hands, a natural leader and one of the few in the early 20's age range, for a late round 1 pick and a fringe player???

What the hell is so good about that?


Nee!
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400917Post Wayne42 »

fugazi wrote:So we trade out our only experienced ruckman, with a huge tank and great hands, a natural leader and one of the few in the early 20's age range, for a late round 1 pick and a fringe player???

What the hell is so good about that?
Don't take it too seriously, forumites are just filling in time until the club actually does something.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
noob
Club Player
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 10:32am

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400921Post noob »

His not even a experienced ruckman. How many ruck duels or opponents did he beat this year?


jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400922Post jonesy »

noob wrote:His not even a experienced ruckman. How many ruck duels or opponents did he beat this year?
Not many. Most overrated player on the list. The deal sounds to good to be true so probably is


Bring back the Lockett era
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400925Post SaintPav »



Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400929Post SainterK »

I don't know if its true, but I dd say I thought it was possible when buddy announced he was leaving.


PJ
SS Life Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2008 10:31am
Location: Adelaide

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400930Post PJ »

Ben's a great mark, good kick and an imposing physical threat. His ruckwork is average though....so where does that leave us? Hickey/Stanley combination with Lewis the apprentice.

Not sure about Savage but I doubt the deal is real.


I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400938Post SainterK »

PJ wrote:Ben's a great mark, good kick and an imposing physical threat. His ruckwork is average though....so where does that leave us? Hickey/Stanley combination with Lewis the apprentice.

Not sure about Savage but I doubt the deal is real.
Is he so bad if rotating with Hale, i50 and in the ruck?

I guess it's who's your partner.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400941Post saintspremiers »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
joffaboy wrote: My source tells me Giles and Cameron as well
Plus the rights to Israel Folau should he ever decide to return to the AFL :P
Plus Kewell as our new goalsneak


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400948Post The Redeemer »

fugazi wrote:So we trade out our only experienced ruckman, with a huge tank and great hands, a natural leader and one of the few in the early 20's age range, for a late round 1 pick and a fringe player???

What the hell is so good about that?
He has a tank but he runs possibly slower than me.

He does not take enough marks to justify having great hands either.

Does it matter if he is a great leader when he performances have not been entirely amazing thus far?

That being stated he is at a stage where he could break-out and with that, I don't see the point in trading him.


PJ
SS Life Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2008 10:31am
Location: Adelaide

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400954Post PJ »

SainterK wrote:
PJ wrote:Ben's a great mark, good kick and an imposing physical threat. His ruckwork is average though....so where does that leave us? Hickey/Stanley combination with Lewis the apprentice.

Not sure about Savage but I doubt the deal is real.
Is he so bad if rotating with Hale, i50 and in the ruck?

I guess it's who's your partner.
That doesn't sound like a particularly agile/mobile ruck combination. Look, he's a pretty imposing player in our line up but is it the best we can do with our list. Our problem has always been can you fit Ben, Stanley and Hickey in the same team before you get too top heavy.


I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
User avatar
evo
Club Player
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
Location: Wimmera
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400958Post evo »

I would love to see McEvoy in Hawthorn colors......Guaranteed ruck domination every time we play Dorkthorn !!! :D :D


Moorabbin Man
Club Player
Posts: 535
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2011 1:31pm

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400963Post Moorabbin Man »

Shrewd deal if true


User avatar
duckduckduckgoose
Club Player
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007 12:55pm

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400972Post duckduckduckgoose »

fugazi wrote:So we trade out our only experienced ruckman, with a huge tank and great hands, a natural leader and one of the few in the early 20's age range, for a late round 1 pick and a fringe player???

What the hell is so good about that?
exactly.
Ben ain't going nowhere- he's the kind of player we are trying to get INTO the club.

Sheesh, I thought he had a pretty good year considering he rucked alone for most of it!
Goldstein and he are the only ones in the league capable of that- of course he's not the complete package yet but what ruckman is at his age?
That number 1 Kruzer? That number 2 Nic Nat?


Why there is emphasis still on tapwork these days is beyond me... the game has moved on.

Just like:
Do we care anymore how quick someone is leading out of the goalsquare? No.
That used to be a big deal remember- I used to love gloating to my mates about how good Plugger was at it for a guy his size.
Lloyd, Dunstall, Lynch- same skill, irrelevant in todays endurance footy.

Sure, it's still a nice thing for someone to have- pace off a standing start... but not something that defines the worth of a player.
Same with tapwork- nice to have.. non essential when compared with essentials like endurance, footy smarts and marking- things Big Ben has in spades.

The biggest thing McEvoy needs to work on is his leading timing and patterns while up forward.... But that will come with experience


I bought a shirt from Target once.
It had a hard tag on it too.

I know how Dal feels.
SaintSimmo
Club Player
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400975Post SaintSimmo »

duckduckduckgoose wrote: Why there is emphasis still on tapwork these days is beyond me... the game has moved on.

Just like:
Do we care anymore how quick someone is leading out of the goalsquare? No.
That used to be a big deal remember- I used to love gloating to my mates about how good Plugger was at it for a guy his size.
Lloyd, Dunstall, Lynch- same skill, irrelevant in todays endurance footy.

Sure, it's still a nice thing for someone to have- pace off a standing start... but not something that defines the worth of a player.
Same with tapwork- nice to have.. non essential when compared with essentials like endurance, footy smarts and marking- things Big Ben has in spades.

The biggest thing McEvoy needs to work on is his leading timing and patterns while up forward.... But that will come with experience
I guess kicking goals for a forward is nice to have, but non essential?

Tapwork is sort of what the ruckman is there to do.


Sainter for life.
lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400976Post lefty »

Don't think I'd do it, very hard to come by good ruck's.

McEvoy is really good around the ground, but not so with the taps. We only really have Hickey and Stanley left.

Unsure, I mean Savage is "ok" but not that great of a player imo. Pick 18 for McEvoy, mmm not to sure.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400980Post Wayne42 »

lefty wrote:Don't think I'd do it, very hard to come by good ruck's.

McEvoy is really good around the ground, but not so with the taps. We only really have Hickey and Stanley left.

Unsure, I mean Savage is "ok" but not that great of a player imo. Pick 18 for McEvoy, mmm not to sure.
It is hard to come by good rucks, not sure we've come by one yet


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400983Post Con Gorozidis »

Not saying we should or shouldnt

But I think calling Savage just a fringe player is slightly unfair on him.
Ok he didnt play in the GF but 56 games at 22yo in the top side of the last 2 years means ur a pretty good player.
Probably a season or two away from being a gun.

From a bigger picture - how do we rate Hickey and Rhys?

In my opinion one of the 3ruckmen has to go as their isnt room for all 3 in the same side and I think Rhys is a ruckman who can swing fwd but will never be a permanent kpp.


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: McEvoy to Hawthorn

Post: # 1400985Post st.byron »

jaxons wrote:Get ready for this deal.
Shane Savage and Hawthorn's first pick for McEvoy.
Likely to be announced in next day or so.

How come no mention of this in any media rumour files? This is the only place I've seen this.

You haven't answered anyone who asked you for your source. If you're going to post speculation then post as speculation and not as a fact. If it's a fact, give us some evidence of your source. No point discussing it if it's just hot air.


Post Reply