JB I believe you are absolutely right about backing the club and they should be commended for publically announcing their displeasure in Big Eds behaviour.joffaboy wrote:Dont know how this is the Saints fault gringo?gringo wrote:If our captain has been publicly airing his grievances with the club they should have traded him. His past has nothing to do with the future. He made a bad move and should be stripped of his captaincy if he sets a foot wrong again. No more lunatics running the asylum. Fisher should be traded out as well.
Eddie has always had a conflict of interest and the AFL has allowed it. Just another little bit of eroded integrity the current chief allowed to creep in.
All the "rumours" about the Saints have been proven false.
There seems to be some type of orchastrated effort to distablise the Saints this off season.
Started by malicious rumours and innuendo by Mark Fine, screaming hysterically, then we had MASS EXODUS of senior players (again totally incorrect), then Roo of to Collingwood (coach and CEO publicly tell Collingwood and McGuire to F*** Off).
There has been no evidence that any of the above is true, and there is no evidence that Roo publicly aired any grievences. In fact I heard an ex champion footballer on redio this morning telling the world that Nick Riewoldt told him that he would NEVER leave the Saints and was excited to be part of the renewal and rebuild.
So I dont think any blame can be slated towards the Saints. Until there is some type of fact behind these rumour mill, I will back the club.
The important question is, how did the club find out that Ed contacted Roo?
Unless there were other parties present when Ed made contact with Roo then it can only be Ed or Roo that leaked the fact that they had contact and the specifics of the correspondence.
Is it possible that Roo advised the club of the contact made to him by Ed or did the club find out from another source?
It is possible that Roo himself was not happy about the approach made by Ed.