Giants move ON Sam Fisher

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19164
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388886Post SaintPav »

joffaboy wrote:
SaintPav wrote: It could be good deal for us but it's a bad deal for GWS. They'd laugh at the offer.

Why? They would have #1,#3, #19, would also have Fisher. The trade would only be fesiable if they get Buddy. Dont think it would happen, but and i think we may be advantaged but remember we drop from#3 to #9 and patton is a risk.
The deal sounded like it was a lot more in our favour especially given Fisher's age. I could be wrong. It's not terrible for them by any means.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5413
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388889Post saintly »

The Saintsational Man wrote:.....to be honest here, I felt a feeling of "Where there's smoke, there's fire." in regards to "certain" articles that were written about Fisher this year.

Couple that with the fact he's 31 and coming off a season ruined by injury, I think we should explore this trade aggressively.

I agree with this. fisher has only 1 maybe 2 years left. if we get other backmen in the trade, i would ty and trade him to GWS.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388893Post Con Gorozidis »

jaxons wrote:We have to get Taylor Adams from GWS.
Exactly what we need.
A midfield star.
Straight swap for McEvoy as they need a ruckman.
Adams is a jet.
I really want Adams!
If he ends up the Cats I will seriously spew!

If we end up with Aish, Adams, Bruce, Delaney + another decent kid in the draft I will consider it a huge win.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388902Post The Redeemer »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
jaxons wrote:We have to get Taylor Adams from GWS.
Exactly what we need.
A midfield star.
Straight swap for McEvoy as they need a ruckman.
Adams is a jet.
I really want Adams!
If he ends up the Cats I will seriously spew!

If we end up with Aish, Adams, Bruce, Delaney + another decent kid in the draft I will consider it a huge win.
Why are we wanting a player who cannot make an average side's best 22? (Delaney and Kangas)


samwell
Club Player
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2005 12:50pm

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388904Post samwell »

Him & Buddy should have some fun up there!!


FortiusQuoFidelius
Club Player
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388956Post FortiusQuoFidelius »

The Redeemer wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
jaxons wrote:We have to get Taylor Adams from GWS.
Exactly what we need.
A midfield star.
Straight swap for McEvoy as they need a ruckman.
Adams is a jet.
I really want Adams!
If he ends up the Cats I will seriously spew!

If we end up with Aish, Adams, Bruce, Delaney + another decent kid in the draft I will consider it a huge win.
Why are we wanting a player who cannot make an average side's best 22? (Delaney and Kangas)
...he will easily make a s*** side's best 22! :lol: :lol: :lol:


lloyd21
Club Player
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri 28 Sep 2012 4:53pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388970Post lloyd21 »

Think if Fisher did agree to go to Gws for pick 9 and Scharenburg not picked in 1st couple ( Boyd /Aish ) they will pick Matt and with pick 9 get Freeman

Would hope they are able to not give any more early picks away , Saints need mids eg : Dumont/Bontempelli with as many early picks.

They need tall strong midfielders ( Freo) midfielders are 6ft 2inches tall.


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388981Post fugazi »

We have traded well with GWS the last 2 seasons, so it seems there is a good relationship there. Maybe thanks to the SOS connection.

Also, GWS won't see us as big threat to them in next couple of years...so dealing Taylor Adams to us might be plausible.


Nee!
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8395
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388988Post Devilhead »

Do GWS want Dal Santo??

Fisher and Dal Santo to GWS for their no.1 pick :wink: or no.9 pick and Bruce.


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
footynut
Club Player
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388994Post footynut »

Devilhead wrote:Do GWS want Dal Santo??

Fisher and Dal Santo to GWS for their no.1 pick :wink: or no.9 pick and Bruce.
I think that sounds awesome but I think they might say no deal


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388996Post borderbarry »

We could give GWS the option, Paton or Boyd (Pick 1) with Bruce and pick 9 for fisher, McEvoy, pick 3


Megamaguire
Club Player
Posts: 1365
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:40pm
Location: Mitcham

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1388998Post Megamaguire »

Always been a big Sam Fisher fan and not keen on seeing him in other colours.
However his potential worth to GWS as they continue to develope and feel 'the pressure' to develope quickly in regard to the dynamics of Western Sydney is enormous. 2 years of solid dependable backwork from 'the general' would ease the development of all those young stars around him to get better quicker I think.
Fish is worth a fair dinkum top line young mid. Losing one genuine mid on the up very likely wont hurt the further improvement of GWS with experience of AA Fisher into their defensive zone.

I can see why they believe they can lure him north. I believe they are prepared to sacrifice a genuine young talent to make it happen for the club's future developmen.

Interesting time with the cluster of young lions wanting out as well.
Heard on radio that Melbourne are also interested in the experience Dal Santo could bring to their structures under Paul Roos. I don't expect North to be able to give a realistic swap 4 Dal but Melbourne may well be in a better position for that.

I would find it hard to let Fish and Dal go as I would have found it hard to let Ross Lyon go but I hope our Saints brains trust have thei brains switched on if looking to achieve genuine big wins 4 St. Kilda this trade period.
Have heard Saints are real keen on Taylor Adams - if he is a good mid i'm happy the club is at least making a play for our midfield future. This is a project that could take another 3 or 4 years so we need to be adding to our stocks every opportunity we get. :)

G O S A I N T S !


The boy can play and we can build a defence around him that will have respect.
3rd generation saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4661
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
Location: Jurassic Park

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389006Post 3rd generation saint »

Hurricane wrote:Make him part of the Bruce deal.

If Chips is open to a trade and Bruce wants to come to us then we have a pretty strong bargaining position.

BANG BANG
I'm already here.


Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
Spud
Club Player
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 4:14pm
Location: Near the You Yangs, or as my wife used to call it, the Dugongs.
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389021Post Spud »

Royston wrote:Yes big news - our list could/will look different next year.
I know you support the club but I'm lukewarm on whether I want our stars
traded out to regenerate the list....
I agree with you there mate


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389040Post satchmo »

Eastern wrote:GWS seems to "potentially" involved in almost every trade deal at every club at the moment. Could it be that they are using their position to try to de-stabilize every other club in the comp !!
That's classic sheedy stuff.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389054Post Con Gorozidis »

I think they are just flying kites like last year and they will say oh we tried but no-one came to the table.

Unless this time the AFL has leaned on them and said we cant wait for your 5 year plan - we are already losing the battle for hearts and minds out west.


User avatar
duckduckduckgoose
Club Player
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007 12:55pm

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389096Post duckduckduckgoose »

I see Fisher in the same boat as Lake last year.
What did the doggies get for Lake?
He'd be a great pickup for a team pushing for a flag or GWS looking for veterans.
Worth more to us and any potential suitor than a 3rd or 4th round pick, regardless of age I would have thought.

Quality A grade player with a couple of years left, 2nd rounder or no deal I say.
Is he contracted?


I bought a shirt from Target once.
It had a hard tag on it too.

I know how Dal feels.
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389099Post Wayne42 »

borderbarry wrote:We could give GWS the option, Paton or Boyd (Pick 1) with Bruce and pick 9 for fisher, McEvoy, pick 3

Do you really think SOS would fall for that deal. Reads as being very one sided, in our favour, a potentially top quality forward and a young potential career CHB for

a defender who is near the end of his career and a ruckman who can't win a hit out. Go SOS


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389109Post dragit »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Unless this time the AFL has leaned on them…
Think they have to become competitive next year, very disappointing this year and miles off GCS's second year.

Hard to keep promising kids when you have one win in a year.

Throw in Franklin, Fisher, Bellchambers & maybe a Cross as a rookie and they should be a lot more competitive.


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389183Post Griggsy »

Fisher McEvoy 19 -> pick 1 + 3rd round


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389197Post The Redeemer »

duckduckduckgoose wrote:I see Fisher in the same boat as Lake last year.
What did the doggies get for Lake?
He'd be a great pickup for a team pushing for a flag or GWS looking for veterans.
Worth more to us and any potential suitor than a 3rd or 4th round pick, regardless of age I would have thought.

Quality A grade player with a couple of years left, 2nd rounder or no deal I say.
Is he contracted?
If we get Hrovat from a trade of Fisher through the draft then that is a win for us and who cares about the other side


User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389200Post sax »

The Redeemer wrote:
duckduckduckgoose wrote:I see Fisher in the same boat as Lake last year.
What did the doggies get for Lake?
He'd be a great pickup for a team pushing for a flag or GWS looking for veterans.
Worth more to us and any potential suitor than a 3rd or 4th round pick, regardless of age I would have thought.

Quality A grade player with a couple of years left, 2nd rounder or no deal I say.
Is he contracted?
If we get Hrovat from a trade of Fisher through the draft then that is a win for us and who cares about the other side
How will we get Hrovat if we trade Fisher to GWS? He plays for the Dogs!

If we could get Bruce & Adams or pick 19, I think that's a win - win.


Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389205Post bergholt »

duckduckduckgoose wrote:I see Fisher in the same boat as Lake last year.
What did the doggies get for Lake?
Lake and 27 for 21 and 47.

You're probably right that they're similar, which is why all this talk of first-round picks is fanciful.


User avatar
mightysainters
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389242Post mightysainters »

Good, a change in culture is welcomed, epecially if it means getting rid of Fisher...

Heard some flutterings around the traps this year, and i would be happy for him to move on...

Fisher for Bruce and round 3 is more likely...


footynut
Club Player
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Giants move ON Sam Fisher

Post: # 1389254Post footynut »

People keep forgetting that we can get Bruce for nothing in the PSD. Why wouldn't we want to strengthen our position?


Post Reply