The official unofficial delistings thread

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3385
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383126Post older saint »

slider wrote:Gold Coast are willing to move heaven and earth for a running half back, Gilbert comes to mind. Personally i think hes playing his best footy right now, would hate to trade him out, we need all the quality backman we can get.
Makes it a perfect time to trade - increased value and really will not be there when we climb back in to top 8


slider
Club Player
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 15 Feb 2012 8:43pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383127Post slider »

Would probably be a damned if you do and damned if you dont, but its all pyss and wind at the moment, they havent thrown any cards on the table.


Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 768 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383128Post Goose is king »

I was/am all for keeping Jones but if he keeps a spot ahead of Ledger or Dunell I would prefer to see him go.


saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383137Post saint6709 »

Lever - just turned 20 - he stays IMO


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383165Post defacto »

saint6709 wrote:Lever - just turned 20 - he stays IMO
should we rookie him though, to free up spots on the senior list?


Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2190
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 187 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383203Post Zed »

defacto wrote:
saint6709 wrote:Lever - just turned 20 - he stays IMO
should we rookie him though, to free up spots on the senior list?
Good idea. Possibly a solution for the Saad situation as well ?

Dunnell I reckon will get the chop, and im guessing Shents as well. Even though on form Staley and Lever should go before Shents I just reckon their height and our lack of defensive talls buys them both another year.

With the retirements that would then open up 5 spots on the senior list. First 3 draft picks in the top 40. then just a matter of whether we can snag a FA or trade deal.

I dont know why but I just think this year clubs will do some very strange trades with over the odds being paid by numerous clubs desperate for a quick fix.


“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
seano1
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 22 Sep 2008 7:10pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383210Post seano1 »

as we dont have much depth in the back line...i cant see any of those guys going as its been a tough year with most being injure at some stage and as we have heaps of small forward type players thats where the cuts will be made is my guess.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383212Post bergholt »

Zed wrote:I dont know why but I just think this year clubs will do some very strange trades with over the odds being paid by numerous clubs desperate for a quick fix.
Not many clubs seriously "rebuilding" at the moment, which is great. Really just us and Melbourne focusing seriously on bringing in lots of young talent, most other clubs are either contending or think they could be in a year or two - the 15th placed team had 8 wins whereas last year the 14th placed team only had 5.5!

So there could be a lot of clubs looking for experienced guys in their prime. If we decide to go down the route of trading older guys, we could really bolster our draft position...


User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383216Post ShanghaiSaint »

Dunell no ledger no also


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
ralphsmith
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383225Post ralphsmith »

why would we trade stkfcs most skillful player ever dal santo?

sounds completely and utterly retarded to me


What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
Image
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383250Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:TDL is likely to be contracted still. I would trade Mc Evoy and I think Siposs could be in a bit in a little trouble.
Fisher and dal could be trade bait.
Ferg gone
Shents probably
Staley probably
Saad probably

So only one from the main list. fair enough. Gives us 3 picks if we upgrade Currun.


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10431
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383255Post desertsaint »

Rather ledger stay on. Would take him over Siposs.
Would like both to be given next year though.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Kickit
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed 12 Dec 2012 8:52pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383267Post Kickit »

Ledger is worth more than a de-list. Its keep or trade. At least worth a draft pick upgrade ( I.e. our fourth for someone's third ). Probably the same for Dunell.

There may be a chance for Lever on the rookie list, but no chance he stays on the main list.
Surely TDL is a delist.
Saad will be out or rookie list.

That's 6 off the senior list.
Curren and Minch will take 2.
That leaves four.
I don't believe we have anyone else worth delisting for a fourth round or worse pick.

So any others to go will be part of a trade.

Its a pity Ferg didn't have a better year. He was a long term prospect, and was looking good in 2012 , but seemed to go backwards this year.
Staley showed a bit as well.


Hoges
Club Player
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon 02 Apr 2012 7:40pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383282Post Hoges »

Dal is one of the best ball users in the AFL - surly having him in list helps with training , coaching, showing kids how the elite users play the game - I think dal will be playing for saints next year


User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383339Post St Chris »

The Saad situation is tricky.

He has not officially been sanctioned, and is contracted for a further year. I think our response in regards to his position on the list varies greatly depending on the final sanction. 2 years and he is gone, but 6 months and he is worth keeping IMO.

If his charge and penalty is finalised by the list lodgement dates, his future will be a lot clearer. But if it lingers on beyond trade and draft time, we could find ourselves stuck with a guy taking up a spot on our list who is ineligible for 2 years.


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383347Post maverick »

Retire
Blake
Kosi
Milne

Delist
Saad
Lever (re-draft as rookie)
Dunnell

Upgrade
Curren

Jones, Ledger and TDL very lucky and if we need the room because of trades then Jones, TDL then Ledger in that order.

Rookies
Delist
Shenton
Ferguson

Retain
Minchington
Staley
Lever (TBC)

If we trade for or pick up Dustin Martin or any other player then that leaves 4 picks in the ND.

Should be about right.


Andreous
Club Player
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue 25 Jun 2013 12:56am

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383378Post Andreous »

slider wrote:Gold Coast are willing to move heaven and earth for a running half back, Gilbert comes to mind. Personally i think hes playing his best footy right now, would hate to trade him out, we need all the quality backman we can get.

If they offered their first round draft pick how could we say no????


Kickit
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed 12 Dec 2012 8:52pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383395Post Kickit »

Trades out of the team should look after themselves. Unless we trade a single player for multiple draft picks.

But if we trade a player for a draft pick, that opens up its own spot.
If we trade a player for a draft pick upgrade its one less that needs to be delisted.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383423Post skeptic »

spot on wrote:Retire- kosi , Milne , Blakey
Delist- lever, Dennis lane, saad ( most likely gone)
Rookie delist- staley , ferguson
Rookie up grade- curren
Rookie retain - shenton, minchington

So that's that's leave us 5 national picks/ preseason and 3 rookie picks
I think we will offload 1 other older player to maybe get another early pick or pick up a key defender from somewhere
I do hope they realise they made a mistake with ledger and give Hume another year, is only 21 as well

this is what i'd like to see


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383432Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:TDL is likely to be contracted still. I would trade Mc Evoy and I think Siposs could be in a bit in a little trouble.
Fisher and dal could be trade bait.
Ferg gone
Shents probably
Staley probably
Saad probably

So only one from the main list. fair enough. Gives us 3 picks if we upgrade Currun.

I've already said lever, Simpkin, Siposs, Saad, Dunell and Stanley are in danger in other threads. I would think that TDL is not going if he's contracted and he wasn't as bad as people made out.

Personally i would have tried to get Lenny in to a coaching role in the club as I'm worried his body might not hold up. I would have also looked at trading out Ray and delisting maister.


Kickit
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed 12 Dec 2012 8:52pm

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383443Post Kickit »

I wondered I the Drug Cheats would want Dunell for a 3rd or 4th rounder.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383444Post dragit »

Kickit wrote:I wondered I the Drug Cheats would want Dunell for a 3rd or 4th rounder.
The third round is their first pick…

At any rate, if they are keen, then I'd hold onto him just because. No dealing with cheats.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383449Post Con Gorozidis »

St Chris wrote:The Saad situation is tricky.

He has not officially been sanctioned, and is contracted for a further year. I think our response in regards to his position on the list varies greatly depending on the final sanction. 2 years and he is gone, but 6 months and he is worth keeping IMO.

If his charge and penalty is finalised by the list lodgement dates, his future will be a lot clearer. But if it lingers on beyond trade and draft time, we could find ourselves stuck with a guy taking up a spot on our list who is ineligible for 2 years.
Agree - we need this clarified asap.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383452Post plugger66 »

Kickit wrote:I wondered I the Drug Cheats would want Dunell for a 3rd or 4th rounder.

Dunnel isnt worth a pick at all. He will be kept or delisted.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: The official unofficial delistings thread

Post: # 1383456Post bergholt »

plugger66 wrote:Dunnel isnt worth a pick at all.
In the old days that would be true, but these days any player can be traded with a swap of picks. We might trade Dunell and our fourth rounder (50-odd) for Essendon's third rounder (40-odd). Everyone wins: Essendon get a known quantity, we get rid of a guy who doesn't fit our needs, their pick is not much worse, ours is slightly improved.

TDL was only slightly more well-credentialed when he was traded last year.


Post Reply