Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Hurricane wrote:Like all the commentators that still call Jack Steven StevenS. I mean the guy has been around since what 2008? And they still cant get it right?
If I was that bad at my job id get sacked
BANG BANG
So lets see. We have a go at commentators who say Stevens and thay have to know 700 players but peoploe who claim to follow the saints on here who have to know 40 players also still say it. Its hardly a big deal. getting Blakes first name wrong in an article on his retirement may just be a much bigger deal though.
Hurricane wrote:Like all the commentators that still call Jack Steven StevenS. I mean the guy has been around since what 2008? And they still cant get it right?
If I was that bad at my job id get sacked
BANG BANG
So lets see. We have a go at commentators who say Stevens and thay have to know 700 players but peoploe who claim to follow the saints on here who have to know 40 players also still say it. Its hardly a big deal. getting Blakes first name wrong in an article on his retirement may just be a much bigger deal though.
There's a difference. We're not paid professionals.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
rexy wrote:Adding an S is more just a Bogan thing I think. When I was a kid in Croydon I had plenty of friends who liked to catch the train in to ringwood, they would go to Eastland"S" so they could shop at Myer"S" and Safeway"S"
I could only ever find one of each?
Hurricane wrote:Like all the commentators that still call Jack Steven StevenS. I mean the guy has been around since what 2008? And they still cant get it right?
If I was that bad at my job id get sacked
BANG BANG
So lets see. We have a go at commentators who say Stevens and thay have to know 700 players but peoploe who claim to follow the saints on here who have to know 40 players also still say it. Its hardly a big deal. getting Blakes first name wrong in an article on his retirement may just be a much bigger deal though.
There's a difference. We're not paid professionals.
Well I get things wrong at work and I would suggest everyone else does as well. And hardly anyone says Stevens anyway.
plugger66 wrote:
Well I get things wrong at work and I would suggest everyone else does as well. And hardly anyone says Stevens anyway.
It's far from a hangable offense and it was corrected but the media is and should be subject to a higher standard than someone's work that is not in the public domain. I'm speaking from experience.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
gringo wrote:He will go down with some of the modern greats like Jack Stevens and Jack New- ness. There are some guys who seem to have names that attract the idiots like moths to a candle.
I must say it is hard to not call him Stevens, or Roberton [ Robinson ], or for that matter James Pattinson [ Patterson ].
