Get physical, Ben!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Get physical, Ben!
ROLS-LEE wrote:You must love warnock p66
No because I ont rate ruck hit outs but for some reason thats how you decided if a person is agood ruckman or not.
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Same old dribble in here. One thread and all the haters come in letting it all off. Ben is fine wtf do some of u expect
Fortius Quo Fidelius
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Do you think it's the whole "play like your personality" ?
Maybe Hamill needs to rough him up before a game, antagonise him a bit, fire him up.
Maybe Hamill needs to rough him up before a game, antagonise him a bit, fire him up.
- evo
- Club Player
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
- Location: Wimmera
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Warnock's in this week..plugger66 wrote:"Yes he hasnt had the hit outs of Warnock who cant get game"ROLS-LEE wrote:You must love warnock p66
No because I ont rate ruck hit outs but for some reason thats how you decided if a person is agood ruckman or not.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
And probably have more possessions than Ben too.evo wrote:Warnock's in this week..plugger66 wrote:"Yes he hasnt had the hit outs of Warnock who cant get game"ROLS-LEE wrote:You must love warnock p66
No because I ont rate ruck hit outs but for some reason thats how you decided if a person is agood ruckman or not.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
ROLS-LEE wrote:And probably have more possessions than Ben too.evo wrote:Warnock's in this week..plugger66 wrote:
"Yes he hasnt had the hit outs of Warnock who cant get game"
No because I ont rate ruck hit outs but for some reason thats how you decided if a person is agood ruckman or not.
You will be hoping. I thinks thats the difference. Some want them to fail to be proved right.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Serious? I like the guy and think he's going to be a good player, but on the basis of last night it's pretty stupid to say he's "fine". He had a shocker and not for the first time this season. Hopefully he has a niggle or something.ShanghaiSaint wrote:Same old dribble in here. One thread and all the haters come in letting it all off. Ben is fine wtf do some of u expect
That said, he's still ranked 8th in the comp for hitouts and 9th for contested marks. The contested mark thing is mainly a consequence of our game plan - every time we come out of the backline, we kick to Ben or Roo with three guys on them. Every now and then they take that mark, but more likely we turn it over. That's a separate issue though.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 11:06pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Silvagni is a big wrap for McEvoy. Remember him one of our previous assistant coaches. It is common knowledge they have touched base with the footy club re their interest in a trade.Dr Spaceman wrote:Jimmy O'Dea wrote:The club won't trade Ben for no 1 pick but GWS want him and Tom Boyd is as good a forward as there has been at under 18 level. Just do it.
Leaving aside whether we should or shouldn't trade him, how the hell do you know that GWS want him?
And more to the point, how do you know that GWS are prepared to offer the Saints the #1 Draft Pick to get the deal done?
Re: Get physical, Ben!
The issue I have with McEvoy is he hasn't improved over the past two years as I thought he would. Two years ago he was a 22 year old promising ruckman. Now he's a 24 year old ruckman who in my opinion has reached his full potential, which is on par with his form two seasons ago. It's not like he's a skinny kid. He's a very developed and mature player now and looks to be in 'his' prime. He's the type of ruckman who other ruckman would love playing against cos they know they can bully him and really dominate.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Ben showed exactly why we must trade him tonight - he has value in some corners and that must be exploited. Getting physical is not in Ben's nature, won't happen.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Get physical, Ben!
sometimes I think Ben would be more use all over the ground, some of his best games is where he kicks a couple and takes pivotal defensive grabs. reckon with development of Hickey and Stanley, who in my opinion are better tap ruckmen, will see Ben used more in this capacity.
but yes, he was definitely soft in the ruck contest tonight.
but yes, he was definitely soft in the ruck contest tonight.
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Ben has some excellent games where he really hits the contest hard, then goes missing for a lot of games. He needs to work on consistency more than anything.
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Get physical, Ben!
thisspert wrote:Ben has some excellent games where he really hits the contest hard, then goes missing for a lot of games. He needs to work on consistency more than anything.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
He's kicked more than one goal on 3 occasions from 87 games so far, unfortunately he's not a big goal kicker... With 26 career goals.millarsaint wrote: some of his best games is where he kicks a couple and takes pivotal defensive grabs.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
He's around 24 with plenty of up side so should attract interest. He'll either be traded or get game time win/win
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
yep...bit soft..as far as ruckmen go...White Winmar wrote:I think I've worked out Ben's problem. He has a complete lack of physical " presence". Neither in the ruck contests, nor around the stoppages, he simply doesn't impose himself. Sure, he gets some hit outs, but rarely,if ever, does he create space for his runners, or take out the opposition. When you compare him to Minson, Mumford and Goldstein, you'll see what I mean. For a guy of his size and ability, he rarely throws doubt into the opposition's minds. Come on Ben. Get physical!
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
3 more possession to equal Bens but with a half to goROLS-LEE wrote:Hey pluggs. Better turn the tv on if you have foxtel and watch that warnock guy that you love so much.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Watching swans game
What an eye opener.
Mumford is seriously physical and they play for keeps.
Quick and tough.
Our boys are a long way off it ....
What an eye opener.
Mumford is seriously physical and they play for keeps.
Quick and tough.
Our boys are a long way off it ....
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
I just hope he does a Minson- just when they look like trade stocking-stuffers he comes good. I like big mac but I wish he won more hit outs to advantage.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
I don't mind if we trade Ben because he will fetch top dollar and we need it right now, and we can probably cope without him.
But.
Geez there are some dickheads here with regards to his ability.
But.
Geez there are some dickheads here with regards to his ability.
Re: Get physical, Ben!
ROLS-LEE wrote:3 more possession to equal Bens but with a half to goROLS-LEE wrote:Hey pluggs. Better turn the tv on if you have foxtel and watch that warnock guy that you love so much.
I love people who hope our players arent good so they can say I told you so. I love people who work on just one game. I then realise thay actually have no idea. Hi blind deer.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Poor pluggs. Ive been telling you all year but somehow you bring up this one game crap and you also bring up Warnock. Sounds like you have a bout of amnesia or watching something elseplugger66 wrote:ROLS-LEE wrote:3 more possession to equal Bens but with a half to goROLS-LEE wrote:Hey pluggs. Better turn the tv on if you have foxtel and watch that warnock guy that you love so much.
I love people who hope our players arent good so they can say I told you so. I love people who work on just one game. I then realise thay actually have no idea. Hi blind deer.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:45am
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Get physical, Ben!
Poor pluggs. Ive been telling you all year but somehow you bring up this one game crap and you also bring up Warnock. Sounds like you have a bout of amnesia or watching something else[/quote]plugger66 wrote:ROLS-LEE wrote:3 more possession to equal Bens but with a half to goROLS-LEE wrote:Hey pluggs. Better turn the tv on if you have foxtel and watch that warnock guy that you love so much.
I love people who hope our players arent good so they can say I told you so. I love people who work on just one game. I then realise thay actually have no idea. Hi blind deer.
And as for Warnock, not bad for a second or third string ruckmen that cant get a game.