Tom Ledger??

[stinger]

Hello stalker

u 2.....

[Junction Oval]

a) We recruited him because the recruiters valued him. (b) We are severely depleted for this week. (c) Winning games no longer matters. (d) The Coach is under pressure to improve things for next year. (e) TL has been playing well in the reserves.

THEN - "why not give him some consecutive games to show what he can do?" - FFS.

[evo]

I just watched a replay of the weekends game, paying close attention to Ledger.
He gets the ball a lot, but doesn't seem too damaging.

I thought both Shenton and Minchington were more impressive with their impact on the game and decision making.

That's how I saw it as well.

[defacto]

Watters did not draft Ledger. He has shown bias to the ones he drafted, thats a clear fact. Theres no way Saunders Murdoch etc showed better form than him in the VFL. From talking to Sandringham staff there's no attitude problem at all and he's been terrific in the way he's come to VFL. He just deserves a shot

f***** LOL so the coaching staff are biased are they?

why would they do that?

[Kickit]

I just watched a replay of the weekends game, paying close attention to Ledger.
He gets the ball a lot, but doesn't seem too damaging.

I thought both Shenton and Minchington were more impressive with their impact on the game and decision making.

So we should play him for the rest of the year, letting him run around and get a lot of non-damaging disposals, proclaim him to be the next Dane Swan or Matthew Boyd, then trade him for pick 10.