Tom Ledger??
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
I dont think he's not being played for no good reason but i find the coaches inability to address whatever the issue is extremely frustrating
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
After watching Hutchings at WC and Lynch at the Crows redirect their careers after being given the boot by the saints maybe we should have one more look at Ledge!
PADDLEPOP1000
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
Paddlepop1001 said :
Good point. From a ladder peespective, we can certainly afford to take a look at Ledger over a few consecutive games. That will be a "real world" indicator.After watching Hutchings at WC and Lynch at the Crows redirect their careers after being given the boot by the saints maybe we should have one more look at Ledge!
Re: Tom Ledger??
Even if we don't want him going forward, give him a run in the AFL, let him rack up some dream team points and maybe we can get something for him in trade.
If its only a late pick it can still be worth something bundled with other trades.
At the moment it looks like we'll delist him for nothing.
If its only a late pick it can still be worth something bundled with other trades.
At the moment it looks like we'll delist him for nothing.
Re: Tom Ledger??
Jack Steven ..... Ball winner, terrible kick
Tom Ledger ..... Ball winner, Terrible kick
Albeit at different levels, but can they be compared.... I would suggest Tom is the VFL version of Jack.... In fact the gamevs Geelong you are talking about, was almost mirrored By Tom the next day vs Geelong in the VFL.... When Sandy got beat by 100
So can you can compare them.... I would think so?
Is Jack playing at a higher standard..... I would think so?
I didn't compare the as footballers, I pointed out that kicking is not a great excuse because we have butchers in the seniors... Of which Jack is one.... They have similar playing styles
Is Tom 2 & 1/2 years younger than Jack..... Yes
Do I HATE Jack Steven?
No, I reckon he's a good player, as his B&F finish will suggest..... The hero worshipping does astound me, especially to the point where his OBVIOUS issues are refuted.... Are we that devoid of young talent that when we get an OK youngish player we are smitten by him??
He wins lots of ball, He turns it over a lot, he thinks defence is what's around the ground.... But he has great work rate...
So good player.... Yes
My idol...... No
Tom Ledger ..... Ball winner, Terrible kick
Albeit at different levels, but can they be compared.... I would suggest Tom is the VFL version of Jack.... In fact the gamevs Geelong you are talking about, was almost mirrored By Tom the next day vs Geelong in the VFL.... When Sandy got beat by 100
So can you can compare them.... I would think so?
Is Jack playing at a higher standard..... I would think so?
I didn't compare the as footballers, I pointed out that kicking is not a great excuse because we have butchers in the seniors... Of which Jack is one.... They have similar playing styles
Is Tom 2 & 1/2 years younger than Jack..... Yes
Do I HATE Jack Steven?
No, I reckon he's a good player, as his B&F finish will suggest..... The hero worshipping does astound me, especially to the point where his OBVIOUS issues are refuted.... Are we that devoid of young talent that when we get an OK youngish player we are smitten by him??
He wins lots of ball, He turns it over a lot, he thinks defence is what's around the ground.... But he has great work rate...
So good player.... Yes
My idol...... No
Re: Tom Ledger??
BigMart wrote:Jack Steven ..... Ball winner, terrible kick
Tom Ledger ..... Ball winner, Terrible kick
Albeit at different levels, but can they be compared.... I would suggest Tom is the VFL version of Jack.... In fact the gamevs Geelong you are talking about, was almost mirrored By Tom the next day vs Geelong in the VFL.... When Sandy got beat by 100
So can you can compare them.... I would think so?
Is Jack playing at a higher standard..... I would think so?
I didn't compare the as footballers, I pointed out that kicking is not a great excuse because we have butchers in the seniors... Of which Jack is one.... They have similar playing styles
Is Tom 2 & 1/2 years younger than Jack..... Yes
Do I HATE Jack Steven?
No, I reckon he's a good player, as his B&F finish will suggest..... The hero worshipping does astound me, especially to the point where his OBVIOUS issues are refuted.... Are we that devoid of young talent that when we get an OK youngish player we are smitten by him??
He wins lots of ball, He turns it over a lot, he thinks defence is what's around the ground.... But he has great work rate...
So good player.... Yes
My idol...... No
Jack Steven. Terrible kick. What a lot of rubbish. he has improved so much this year but because you cant say the word wrrr you will keep going on about it. Afterall just 2 weeks ago you only rated him a fair player. Now that is a real lack of footy knowledge. I notice he went at 88% efficenty last game and that was his worst game for about 6 weeks. That really proves that efficenty isnt the be all and end all of a very good player. I also noticed that 2 weeks after rating him a fair player you now rate him a good player.
And im sure he is happy to hear you dont HATE him. probably as happy as Shenton and Staley.
Re: Tom Ledger??
Hmm...
Can only wonder, let me guess
Some unsubstantiated comments, untruths and ridiculous statements.... A bit of redirection in a attempt to discredit??
How did I go?
Or perhaps it wasn't even referring to me, considering your a 'foe' ..... But some how I doubt it....
Can only wonder, let me guess
Some unsubstantiated comments, untruths and ridiculous statements.... A bit of redirection in a attempt to discredit??
How did I go?
Or perhaps it wasn't even referring to me, considering your a 'foe' ..... But some how I doubt it....
Re: Tom Ledger??
BigMart wrote:Hmm...
Can only wonder, let me guess
Some unsubstantiated comments, untruths and ridiculous statements.... A bit of redirection in a attempt to discredit??
How did I go?
Or perhaps it wasn't even referring to me, considering your a 'foe' ..... But some how I doubt it....
For a person who has me on ignore you really struggle to ignore me. Its so strange. For others I was just pointing out how silly you post was. i think people are allowed to do that.
Re: Tom Ledger??
lol so were comparing jack steven to tom ledger nowBigMart wrote:Jack Steven ..... Ball winner, terrible kick
Tom Ledger ..... Ball winner, Terrible kick
Albeit at different levels, but can they be compared.... I would suggest Tom is the VFL version of Jack.... In fact the gamevs Geelong you are talking about, was almost mirrored By Tom the next day vs Geelong in the VFL.... When Sandy got beat by 100
So can you can compare them.... I would think so?
Is Jack playing at a higher standard..... I would think so?
I didn't compare the as footballers, I pointed out that kicking is not a great excuse because we have butchers in the seniors... Of which Jack is one.... They have similar playing styles
Is Tom 2 & 1/2 years younger than Jack..... Yes
Do I HATE Jack Steven?
No, I reckon he's a good player, as his B&F finish will suggest..... The hero worshipping does astound me, especially to the point where his OBVIOUS issues are refuted.... Are we that devoid of young talent that when we get an OK youngish player we are smitten by him??
He wins lots of ball, He turns it over a lot, he thinks defence is what's around the ground.... But he has great work rate...
So good player.... Yes
My idol...... No
tom ledger doesnt have anywhere near the potential that jack had showed early on
jack also follows the coaches instruction
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
See this i dont like. Jack was never a world beater in the VFL either... In fact, of the 2, Tom VFL form is better than Jack's was. Jack earnt his shot and developed. He has weaknesses but has worked on them.defacto wrote:lol so were comparing jack steven to tom ledger nowBigMart wrote:Jack Steven ..... Ball winner, terrible kick
Tom Ledger ..... Ball winner, Terrible kick
Albeit at different levels, but can they be compared.... I would suggest Tom is the VFL version of Jack.... In fact the gamevs Geelong you are talking about, was almost mirrored By Tom the next day vs Geelong in the VFL.... When Sandy got beat by 100
So can you can compare them.... I would think so?
Is Jack playing at a higher standard..... I would think so?
I didn't compare the as footballers, I pointed out that kicking is not a great excuse because we have butchers in the seniors... Of which Jack is one.... They have similar playing styles
Is Tom 2 & 1/2 years younger than Jack..... Yes
Do I HATE Jack Steven?
No, I reckon he's a good player, as his B&F finish will suggest..... The hero worshipping does astound me, especially to the point where his OBVIOUS issues are refuted.... Are we that devoid of young talent that when we get an OK youngish player we are smitten by him??
He wins lots of ball, He turns it over a lot, he thinks defence is what's around the ground.... But he has great work rate...
So good player.... Yes
My idol...... No
tom ledger doesnt have anywhere near the potential that jack had showed early on
jack also follows the coaches instruction
Apparently Tom hasn't earnt a shot n wont get that chance.
And we're all cool with it.
But our player development isnt the issue, the drafting is
Re: Tom Ledger??
Lets hope the coach finally backs in Ledger and gives him a shot this week.
Think he may prove a few experts wrong...
Think he may prove a few experts wrong...
Jack Newnes happy to be a Saint !!!! PS and to hit a target !!!
Re: Tom Ledger??
Dr Spaceman wrote:St Ick, everything you say above is probably correct.
However, given where we lie this season and given we are giving games to kids who are having only 2 or 3 kicks, I reckon the Ledge deserves a run in the seniors. If he butchers it; if he's delisted at the end if the year, so be it.
I fully agree. What is there to lose. Give him a chance to earn his spot on the list next year.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
So Skeptic,skeptic wrote:[
See this i dont like. Jack was never a world beater in the VFL either... In fact, of the 2, Tom VFL form is better than Jack's was. Jack earnt his shot and developed. He has weaknesses but has worked on them.
Apparently Tom hasn't earnt a shot n wont get that chance.
And we're all cool with it.
But our player development isnt the issue, the drafting is
Let's pretend you are the Senior Coach and when it comes to picking this week's side Ledger's name is thrown up.
You ask the question of the Sandringham coach
'Has he improved in the area(s) we asked/told him to work on'?
Sandringahma coach replies 'No, he refuses to work on it'.
Do you pick him to p[lay?????
Before everybody gets up in arms over this, it is just a hypothetical from me to Skeptic because I've gotten the impression from his posts that he wants Ledger picked immaterial of any reason.
(I may have misunderstood Skeptic's posts)
Re: Tom Ledger??
Urgh watch the game from the weekend, hits targets both feet fine.. Probably blazes a bit much sometimes but technically is a good kick... Kicked a goal from 65 on his non preferred. Watch the game, yes some poor kicks but the majority are fine. Always been a good kick at afl just robbed of opportunity by Watters
Re: Tom Ledger??
Tom Ledger must be picked this week, regardless of any of the suggestions otherwise on here, to prove that he's not good enough if not to give him a chance to be good enough!
Selections of Sippos and Saad in the last 2 weeks devalue what it means to be selected by a 100+ year old footy club!
Selections of Sippos and Saad in the last 2 weeks devalue what it means to be selected by a 100+ year old footy club!
Maybe this year?
Re: Tom Ledger??
rexy wrote:Tom Ledger must be picked this week, regardless of any of the suggestions otherwise on here, to prove that he's not good enough if not to give him a chance to be good enough!
Selections of Sippos and Saad in the last 2 weeks devalue what it means to be selected by a 100+ year old footy club!
So we gift games to a bloke that is an absolute selfish butcher?
And again BM comparing Ledger to Jack Steven.
My God. Absolutely unbelievable.
Maybe Ledger can goa nd join the other gereat white hope of the desperate Saints support, Tommy Walsh up in Sydney.
I am sure he would kill it at North Shore or St.Ives.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Re: Tom Ledger??
Not sure how you can gift games to a bloke averaging 30?joffaboy wrote:rexy wrote:Tom Ledger must be picked this week, regardless of any of the suggestions otherwise on here, to prove that he's not good enough if not to give him a chance to be good enough!
Selections of Sippos and Saad in the last 2 weeks devalue what it means to be selected by a 100+ year old footy club!
So we gift games to a bloke that is an absolute selfish butcher?
And again BM comparing Ledger to Jack Steven.
My God. Absolutely unbelievable.
Maybe Ledger can goa nd join the other gereat white hope of the desperate Saints support, Tommy Walsh up in Sydney.
I am sure he would kill it at North Shore or St.Ives.
Not sure where I mentioned Jack?
I'm not desperate, I believe form should be rewarded!
The club seems desperate for Sipposs to succeed without working hard though, I hope he succeeds the correct way personally!
Maybe this year?
- Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 825 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
Maybe will handle him like he did BJ .....Hopefully not ....westcoast wrote:Urgh watch the game from the weekend, hits targets both feet fine.. Probably blazes a bit much sometimes but technically is a good kick... Kicked a goal from 65 on his non preferred. Watch the game, yes some poor kicks but the majority are fine. Always been a good kick at afl just robbed of opportunity by Watters
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
dragit wrote:But we really need CJ to keep guys like Rich to only 3 goals in a half… no room for a young mid who is getting 30 touches every week.
CJ was very good on Rich no player would have stopped two of those goals.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
Pffft… Rich had 19 touches… his average for the year… plus kicked 3 goals. That's a loss.CURLY wrote:dragit wrote:But we really need CJ to keep guys like Rich to only 3 goals in a half… no room for a young mid who is getting 30 touches every week.
CJ was very good on Rich no player would have stopped two of those goals.
Here's hoping CJ can keep Mitchell to 38 and 2 goals this week… in another shut down epic.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10507
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
A two on one situation where Jones was blocked and Rich converted from 60 and the other a kick from the middle. Jones did what he could.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Tom Ledger??
So we're absolutely certain Tom L REFUSES to work on aspects of his game.... Of which Simon McPhee is a huge wrap!!
That's just making stuff up??
How do we know he's selfish?? I'd like to have a source???
Really, just apologists trying to justify selection comedy..... He deserves a game, can't even mount a reasonable case otherwise.... Except for the fact, he's out of favour with stamped papers...
And why just mention Tom Walsh, why not Tom Lynch also??
That's just making stuff up??
How do we know he's selfish?? I'd like to have a source???
Really, just apologists trying to justify selection comedy..... He deserves a game, can't even mount a reasonable case otherwise.... Except for the fact, he's out of favour with stamped papers...
And why just mention Tom Walsh, why not Tom Lynch also??
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
Re: Tom Ledger??
Unless he's got an attitude problem we don't know about, I'm stumped.
Bad management is bad management
Re: Tom Ledger??
A few posters on here seem to know??
Apparently
He refuses to improve areas and is a selfish prick
Or
they think they know, and really have no idea and are just trying to justify his lack of selection opportunity??
I wonder which is true
Apparently
He refuses to improve areas and is a selfish prick
Or
they think they know, and really have no idea and are just trying to justify his lack of selection opportunity??
I wonder which is true