Saints in the paper again!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368409Post matrix »

oh agreed for sure
still stupid tho isnt it

they know
they are told
countless times

bye bye for a while


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368411Post savatage »

Geez some of you guys overreact.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368413Post matrix »

who is over reacting?
we are discussing one of our players returning a irregular sample (im guessing a piss test)
it could be a cold n flu tablet?
it couldve been a PED to recover from injury?
it couldve been crushed tiger penis with shark eyeball goo

it couldve been too much coffee

i dont care tbh
id just like it to be in the open (dont have to name the player)


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368414Post magnifisaint »

savatage wrote:Geez some of you guys overreact.
Do you reckon it's a non issue?


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
BringBackMadDog
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1968
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368415Post BringBackMadDog »

the article says an irregular reading, not a positive, are they the same thing or is there a distinction between the two?


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368418Post matrix »

id say for now theres a diff
depending on whether its been sent off to have its second lot of testing?

irregualr could be too much caffine, or a slightly higher than normal HGH
it could be a sudafed

it prob just looks suss so then it has to go for its second round of tests i think


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368419Post stinger »

BringBackMadDog wrote:the article says an irregular reading, not a positive, are they the same thing or is there a distinction between the two?

like the irregular readings found in the six filth players tested after the replayed grand final.........????


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368420Post dragit »

stinger wrote:
dragit wrote:
stinger wrote:another leak by the afl to caro...this one meant to take some of the heat of essendon....yeah....good one caro... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: not..
Why would Wilson want to take any heat off Essendon? She has been their biggest critic…

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

where did you go to school..????....the afl leaked the story to caro.....they wanted to take some of the heat of essendon....not caro...for pity's sake..... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
You know I didn't go to school stinger, after-all you called me a flea... so I obviously grew up in a circus.

So the AFL wants to take the heat out of a huge drug scandal by leaking information about a separate drug scandal?, that makes sense, so cunning that it just doesn't make any sense.


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368421Post savatage »

I'd say the majority of people posting here are overreacting.

Is it a non issue? I don't know what it is - but neither do the rest of you.

Is it enough to ruin my day & cause me stress? No.

What will be, will be my friends.


mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368423Post mullet »

matrix wrote:id say for now theres a diff
depending on whether its been sent off to have its second lot of testing?

irregualr could be too much caffine, or a slightly higher than normal HGH
it could be a sudafed

it prob just looks suss so then it has to go for its second round of tests i think
They will test the B sample and see how that comes up. But they now have a thing (name escapes me) something "passport". So they can go back years
and find irregularities. That is how all these olympic gold medals are losing their medals from 2008 and 2004. Yep I kid you not.
So it really is getting harder for the cheats. As long as tests are carried out that is.

I actually think we are lucky the EFC thing is going on, otherwise we would be copping it media wise.

Its sort of ironic isnt it, we are so poor that our idea of doping is taking a sudafed. EFC had their own chemist


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368425Post Con Gorozidis »

I have been suss in particular saints player for a few years now.
I wonder if I'm right.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368426Post gringo »

mullet wrote:
matrix wrote:id say for now theres a diff
depending on whether its been sent off to have its second lot of testing?

irregualr could be too much caffine, or a slightly higher than normal HGH
it could be a sudafed

it prob just looks suss so then it has to go for its second round of tests i think
They will test the B sample and see how that comes up. But they now have a thing (name escapes me) something "passport". So they can go back years
and find irregularities. That is how all these olympic gold medals are losing their medals from 2008 and 2004. Yep I kid you not.
So it really is getting harder for the cheats. As long as tests are carried out that is.

I actually think we are lucky the EFC thing is going on, otherwise we would be copping it media wise.

Its sort of ironic isnt it, we are so poor that our idea of doping is taking a sudafed. EFC had their own chemist

Or if it truly was a tablet taken by accident unlucky that we are in a maelstrom of drug hype right now.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10517
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368427Post CURLY »

Con Gorozidis wrote:I have been suss in particular saints player for a few years now.
I wonder if I'm right.

Please just shut up.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368429Post fingers »

The age saying Saad


fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368432Post fingers »

savatage wrote:I'd say the majority of people posting here are overreacting.

Is it a non issue? I don't know what it is - but neither do the rest of you.

Is it enough to ruin my day & cause me stress? No.

What will be, will be my friends.

This.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368435Post saintsRrising »

Three scenarios...once they check the B sample:

* Positive sample and above the cut-off level = gone unless the very VERY unlikely circumstance of extenuationg circumstances such as of being unconscious when given etc. (= virtually no chance of getting off)
* Positive sample and below the cut-off level = not-gone (ie as rumoured with the Pies players)
* Negative sample = not-gone as a will be deemed to be spurious.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
SAAD
Club Player
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat 26 Jan 2013 3:33pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368436Post SAAD »

My guess is it was a gym pre work put supplement drink high in caffeine n other banned substances that are nothing close to steroids but an extra bit of energy


mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368438Post mullet »

fingers wrote:The age saying Saad
oh dear, there goes the multi cultural ambassador role if true


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368439Post gringo »

Con Gorozidis wrote:I have been suss in particular saints player for a few years now.
I wonder if I'm right.

There is only one player with the big guns on our list so if it was HGH Tommy Curren would be the obvious one but he wasn't even playing a month ago and they probably aren't going hard on the VFL guys. The rest of our guys are so small it would be embarrassing for the suppliers.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368440Post Dr Spaceman »

mullet wrote: oh dear, there goes the multi cultural ambassador role if true
Maybe it had something to do with culture, diet, fasting etc. Maybe that will provide an "out" :?


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368441Post gringo »

Didn't see they had said Saad- s*** I hope it isn't anything serious then.


St.Carl
Club Player
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon 15 Sep 2008 10:38pm

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368442Post St.Carl »

The Age now naming Ahmed Saad as facing a two year ban.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 2qxha.html


St Carl
mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368443Post mullet »

SAAD wrote:My guess is it was a gym pre work put supplement drink high in caffeine n other banned substances that are nothing close to steroids but an extra bit of energy
Yes there are many of these around that stimulate the brain and body, however there is something in them that is illegal.

Unfortunately ignorance is no excuse, however he may only get 6 months. Just going on what happened to Discus thrower Sandra Perkovic a few years ago. Same sort of thing.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368445Post perfectionist »

fingers wrote:The age saying Saad
Maybe they meant sad.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Saints in the paper again!

Post: # 1368446Post dragit »

What a disaster for Ahmed if he gets a ban, he's had a poor year, but I still had hopes for him, not much chance if he can't play football for 1-2 years though as he's already coming from a long way back.

As far as the club is concerned, a small forward is one area which we can comfortably take a hit.


Post Reply