Mitch brown

saintbrat · Post: # 1364203Post **saintbrat** » Mon 22 Jul 2013 7:45pm

M Brown he is putting of contract talks
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-07-22/b ... ant-commit

gringo · Post: # 1364208Post **gringo** » Mon 22 Jul 2013 8:04pm

Tom Lynch left for opportunity. Watters will come with a great reputation from his brother. He knows we can guarantee him a few years at least playing every game he's available with no one taking his spot away.

Con Gorozidis · Mon 22 Jul 2013 8:08pm

Well ave him
West Coast are heading for some time at the bottom also I think

battye · Post: # 1364265Post **battye** » Mon 22 Jul 2013 9:27pm

When I've seen him play, I've been fairly unimpressed. Proven to be average at AFL level is perhaps one way to look at it.
I'd be looking to the WAFL/SANFL/VFL before Mitch Brown.

gringo · Post: # 1364266Post **gringo** » Mon 22 Jul 2013 9:34pm

Same as Zac he will improve structure and make us a better team. We need him or someone similar. The picture of him making Cloke look stressed as he punches from behind is why we need him. It would be nice to not facepalm when we see Gwilt standing next to a ruckman who has been stuck in there to stretch us. he tries hard but seriously Fisher, Simpkin and Gwilt just can't do the jobs they are sometimes expected to.

Greg T · Post: # 1364267Post **Greg T** » Mon 22 Jul 2013 9:38pm

He hasn't set the world on fire,but maybe likeRoberton,
A change of club etc may kick him on.....

mr six o'clock · Mon 22 Jul 2013 10:19pm

If we get him for nothing then good !
WC say he's in career best form , he has played 13 games this year so he must be doing alright . He's not a defender that racks up huge possessions , a bit like maxie but the important thing is his opponent not kicking a bag .
If were to trade a low pick to get him , i'd be disappointed .

kimberly saint · Mon 22 Jul 2013 10:47pm

mr six o'clock wrote:If we get him for nothing then good !
WC say he's in career best form , he has played 13 games this year so he must be doing alright . He's not a defender that racks up huge possessions , a bit like maxie but the important thing is his opponent not kicking a bag .
If were to trade a low pick to get him , i'd be disappointed .

Thought he was free agent ?? Maybe no need for trade

maxdis 42 · Post: # 1364531Post **maxdis 42** » Tue 23 Jul 2013 3:39pm

This makes it interesting now..still think he will walk

http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/afl/we ... 6683232714

supersaints · Wed 24 Jul 2013 8:51am

Hope we have "plan B" this year. We need to cast our net far and wide.
IMO he has not really wanted out, he just wanted more games.
Still not convinced he will be a gun. I hope we don't get done over again by wet toast.

dragit · Post: # 1364783Post **dragit** » Wed 24 Jul 2013 9:21am

TDL straight swap.

St Ick · Post: # 1364784Post **St Ick** » Wed 24 Jul 2013 9:23am

dragit wrote:TDL straight swap.

TDL & Ledger for the go home factor.

dragit · Post: # 1364785Post **dragit** » Wed 24 Jul 2013 9:25am

St Ick wrote:
dragit wrote:TDL straight swap.
TDL & Ledger for the go home factor.

Alright, you drive a hard bargain... I'll throw in CJ too.

gringo · Post: # 1364844Post **gringo** » Wed 24 Jul 2013 12:41pm

He's definitely going - why would he hold out until the end of the season unless he's looking around. He is somehow judged on his possession count but he is an old fashioned defender who will stop his man not set up play like Matthew Scarlett. Brown at the Pies would be who I would look at for a comparison. Tate Pears should be on our radar and GWS actually have glut of tall backs too.

Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown

Re: Mitch brown