Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.mullet wrote:And just for Curly, there have been no frees to either team. Although milney got a 50 after his mark
Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10527
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10527
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.mullet wrote:And just for Curly, there have been no frees to either team. Although milney got a 50 after his mark
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5109
- Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Yeah they dont really work well together , are you allowed to block?plugger66 wrote:Why didnt either Rooy or Maister block for each other. Selfish.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5109
- Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
CURLY wrote:Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.mullet wrote:And just for Curly, there have been no frees to either team. Although milney got a 50 after his mark
Lets see if they umpire as the rest of the round has been umpired
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
CURLY wrote:Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.mullet wrote:And just for Curly, there have been no frees to either team. Although milney got a 50 after his mark
The free against Maister was there. If that is your knowledge then you should be ignored. If our forwards werent selfish that decision wouldnt have happened.
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Holding the ball not paid against Nck Nat.
He ran right into the saints player, dropepd it while being tackled....NOTHING?
terrible umpiring.
He ran right into the saints player, dropepd it while being tackled....NOTHING?
terrible umpiring.
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
ralphsmith wrote:Holding the ball not paid against Nck Nat.
He ran right into the saints player, dropepd it while being tackled....NOTHING?
terrible umpiring.
As opposed to Geary half a second earlier. And what the hell was Stanley doing against Cox.
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Saad very poor in that attempt on goal... Looking to boost his goal tally and not playing team football... Selfish front runner at the moment..
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
oK AS LONG as they are consistent and don't pay holding the ball for the rest of the game i'm ok with it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10527
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
I understand the rule completely its the one they have chosen to ignore for two weeks. Just like holding the ball three blatant frees Cox Shuey and. NIC Nat all ignored. Blatant joke.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.mullet wrote:And just for Curly, there have been no frees to either team. Although milney got a 50 after his mark
The free against Maister was there. If that is your knowledge then you should be ignored. If our forwards werent selfish that decision wouldnt have happened.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
What do we have to so to get A holding the ball called, about 4 in the quarter missed
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
I feel we lack a yard of pace. heaps of opportunities off half back but none of our guys can capitalise on them.
wright is a big loss for us.
where is roberton?
wright is a big loss for us.
where is roberton?
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
CURLY wrote:I understand the rule completely its the one they have chosen to ignore for two weeks. Just like holding the ball three blatant frees Cox Shuey and. NIC Nat all ignored. Blatant joke.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:
Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.
The free against Maister was there. If that is your knowledge then you should be ignored. If our forwards werent selfish that decision wouldnt have happened.
Missed the Geary one before the Nic Nat one of course. Your eye is getting worse. nearly as bad as your knowledge of the rules.
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Been about 3 instances were there should have been holding the ball. 2 in the forward line and one in the middle to nick nat.
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
4 if you include the cox non handpass on half backnoob wrote:Been about 3 instances were there should have been holding the ball. 2 in the forward line and one in the middle to nick nat.
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1941
- Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Perth WA
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
You needto explain the free Plugger. I thought tha was about sliding below the need notfor showing desperation and diving towards the ball.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Then a blatant missed free to Roo when he tackled Shuey and a appaling free against Maister. What a joke.mullet wrote:And just for Curly, there have been no frees to either team. Although milney got a 50 after his mark
The free against Maister was there. If that is your knowledge then you should be ignored. If our forwards werent selfish that decision wouldnt have happened.
If I am wrong please let me know. There was only milliseconds in the adjudicated call. I am a little concerned that if diving to this position if now erroneous we have destroyed the desperation part of our ball game.
Next thing will be dives in centre clearance will be frees. This isn't being called regularly.
Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8395
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Saints v Eagles Game Thread
Milney disagreesplugger66 wrote:Idiot
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!