SACK WATTERS!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
SACK WATTERS!
Only joking!
I'll give him until the end of his contract ie. 2014.
But he's got me worried by his NFI selections this week and several other rounds.
/rant over. Feel better now!
I'll give him until the end of his contract ie. 2014.
But he's got me worried by his NFI selections this week and several other rounds.
/rant over. Feel better now!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Who is screaming out at sandy to be picked ?
I thought fergo was ready for the big time but he looked average last week .
I thought fergo was ready for the big time but he looked average last week .
In red white and black from 73
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Tue 27 May 2008 6:35pm
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Ferg was thrown to the wolves and then given 2 quarters, then subbed, then dropped. How do you reckon his confidence is at the moment.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2011 3:29pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Once we have cemented 18th or 17th ill expect watters to start structuring the team as he means to go forward in 2014. So maybe our last 4 or 5 games will give the fans some hope u but in the mean time grin and bare it.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Shhhh....felix wrote:Once we have cemented 18th or 17th ill expect watters to start structuring the team as he means to go forward in 2014. So maybe our last 4 or 5 games will give the fans some hope u but in the mean time grin and bare it.
Don't mention the "T" word....
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2011 5:05pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, Queensland
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Great thread......................................not
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: SACK WATTERS!
I don't think we can take any notice at all of what happens at VFL as the gulf between it and AFL is way to massive !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
It's a massive problem.Eastern wrote:I don't think we can take any notice at all of what happens at VFL as the gulf between it and AFL is way to massive !!
But how do other teams develop their players so much better than ours? Or are we just not recruiting wisely enough??
(I'm talking the last 3 drafts - it's a given prior to that it was totally pathetic).
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 825 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
IMO we just don't have the right people at the club to make us a powerhouse .saintspremiers wrote:It's a massive problem.Eastern wrote:I don't think we can take any notice at all of what happens at VFL as the gulf between it and AFL is way to massive !!
But how do other teams develop their players so much better than ours? Or are we just not recruiting wisely enough??
(I'm talking the last 3 drafts - it's a given prior to that it was totally pathetic).
Or really,have we ever been one.
Coll,Ess,Haw, etc just seem to get it right over and over
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
I'm hoping we win this week and the board give sw full licence to focus on development.
Seems like we are trying to serve two competing aims right now which ain't working.
Board should guarantee sw his job for the next 18 'months and let him build a new team for 2015 starting now.
Seems like we are trying to serve two competing aims right now which ain't working.
Board should guarantee sw his job for the next 18 'months and let him build a new team for 2015 starting now.
- Hurricane
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
- Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira
Re: SACK WATTERS!
What we need is to get a better senior assistant. Laidley clearly isnt cutting it. I cant see why we cant pick up Gary Ayres as senior assistant.
BANG BANG
BANG BANG
Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Fair call.Con Gorozidis wrote:I'm hoping we win this week and the board give sw full licence to focus on development.
Seems like we are trying to serve two competing aims right now which ain't working.
Board should guarantee sw his job for the next 18 'months and let him build a new team for 2015 starting now.
Unless SW has a termination clause similar to Lyon, we'd have to pay him out his contract if sacked early anyway.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Greg T wrote:IMO we just don't have the right people at the club to make us a powerhouse .saintspremiers wrote:It's a massive problem.Eastern wrote:I don't think we can take any notice at all of what happens at VFL as the gulf between it and AFL is way to massive !!
But how do other teams develop their players so much better than ours? Or are we just not recruiting wisely enough??
(I'm talking the last 3 drafts - it's a given prior to that it was totally pathetic).
Or really,have we ever been one.
Coll,Ess,Haw, etc just seem to get it right over and over
Best statement I've heard on here for a long time but most like to bury there heads in the sand and slam this sort of talk.
IMO we have probably been up in there (in the top eight) more than any other side in the last 25 years but don't know how to finish.
Other clubs come up win a flag then go right down then rebuild back up to win another flag and we just keep battling it out with them all in the finals.
People will respond about one kick here or there would have changed our fortune but all clubs have had those as well but most still also managed to find a way.
For how good our lists have been since the late eighties and all the opportunities we've had (as I said probably more than any other side) it has to be more than just a coincidence or bad luck.
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Why the hell would we sack him at this point anyway?
I think a lot of people have held on to their rosé coloured glasses too long.
And the argument about the powerhouses of the AFL, can someone remind me where Coll, Ess, Blues, Rich, WCE all finished between 2005-2010?
At one stage during this time each of those clubs finished bottom 4 or worse, turned around for them didnt it? And that all happened after a period of particular dominance.
Give Watters and the club time FFS.
NB all except Rich
I think a lot of people have held on to their rosé coloured glasses too long.
And the argument about the powerhouses of the AFL, can someone remind me where Coll, Ess, Blues, Rich, WCE all finished between 2005-2010?
At one stage during this time each of those clubs finished bottom 4 or worse, turned around for them didnt it? And that all happened after a period of particular dominance.
Give Watters and the club time FFS.
NB all except Rich
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
Re: SACK WATTERS!
I agree about SW but your 5 year record means little. Lets look at the big picture.Buckets wrote:Why the hell would we sack him at this point anyway?
I think a lot of people have held on to their rosé coloured glasses too long.
And the argument about the powerhouses of the AFL, can someone remind me where Coll, Ess, Blues, Rich, WCE all finished between 2005-2010?
At one stage during this time each of those clubs finished bottom 4 or worse, turned around for them didnt it? And that all happened after a period of particular dominance.
Give Watters and the club time FFS.
NB all except Rich
Since 1988
Collingwood 2 flags
Essendon 2 flags
Hawthorn 4 flags
West Coast 3 flags
Carlton 1 flag
Brisbane 3 flags
Adelaide 2 flags
Port Adelaide 1 flag
North Melbourne 2 flags
Sydney 2 flags
Geelong 3 flags
Now I don't know the record but I am sure we have been in the finals far more than all these teams over that time and this is what frustrates me...
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: SACK WATTERS!
Essendon? Matthew Knights. Peptides. Yeah, they always get it right.Greg T wrote:IMO we just don't have the right people at the club to make us a powerhouse .saintspremiers wrote:It's a massive problem.Eastern wrote:I don't think we can take any notice at all of what happens at VFL as the gulf between it and AFL is way to massive !!
But how do other teams develop their players so much better than ours? Or are we just not recruiting wisely enough??
(I'm talking the last 3 drafts - it's a given prior to that it was totally pathetic).
Or really,have we ever been one.
Coll,Ess,Haw, etc just seem to get it right over and over
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.