Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338900Post dragit »

3rd generation saint wrote:Two weeks ago he out coached Mick Malthouse.
Are you kidding?
Mick took 3 quarters to make a change that most people would have made at the end of the first. We hung on for dear life, but it was hardly a tactical victory.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338912Post Cairnsman »

He's doing ok IMO but needs to show he's also got some guts and drop senior players that are not trying hard enough. He's shown that he doesn't mind calling them out publicly and so now needs to take the next step and drop them to send a message.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338914Post plugger66 »

Cairnsman wrote:He's doing ok IMO but needs to show he's also got some guts and drop senior players that are not trying hard enough. He's shown that he doesn't mind calling them out publicly and so now needs to take the next step and drop them to send a message.

I can never see how a person can tell if a player isnt trying hard enough. maybe they are just out of form or confidence or age is catching up. Why wouldnt they try hard enough anyway? There is no logical reason.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338916Post Cairnsman »

plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:He's doing ok IMO but needs to show he's also got some guts and drop senior players that are not trying hard enough. He's shown that he doesn't mind calling them out publicly and so now needs to take the next step and drop them to send a message.

I can never see how a person can tell if a player isnt trying hard enough. maybe they are just out of form or confidence or age is catching up. Why wouldnt they try hard enough anyway? There is no logical reason.
It's because you never have any idea.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338922Post plugger66 »

Cairnsman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:He's doing ok IMO but needs to show he's also got some guts and drop senior players that are not trying hard enough. He's shown that he doesn't mind calling them out publicly and so now needs to take the next step and drop them to send a message.

I can never see how a person can tell if a player isnt trying hard enough. maybe they are just out of form or confidence or age is catching up. Why wouldnt they try hard enough anyway? There is no logical reason.
It's because you never have any idea.

Your posts are dumbing me down. This one is a perfect example.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338926Post Cairnsman »

plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:

I can never see how a person can tell if a player isnt trying hard enough. maybe they are just out of form or confidence or age is catching up. Why wouldnt they try hard enough anyway? There is no logical reason.
It's because you never have any idea.

Your posts are dumbing me down. This one is a perfect example.
I have no idea why my posts are dumbing you down but I am glad that they are having some effect on you. My dog says hi! He loves the smell of your posts.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338929Post plugger66 »

Cairnsman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:



It's because you never have any idea.

Your posts are dumbing me down. This one is a perfect example.
I have no idea why my posts are dumbing you down but I am glad that they are having some effect on you. My dog says hi! He loves the smell of your posts.

I was hoping your dog was typing your posts. Then we could understand the logic. Hi Rin Tin Tin.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338937Post Cairnsman »

plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Your posts are dumbing me down. This one is a perfect example.
I have no idea why my posts are dumbing you down but I am glad that they are having some effect on you. My dog says hi! He loves the smell of your posts.

I was hoping your dog was typing your posts. Then we could understand the logic. Hi Rin Tin Tin.
Still no idea and still going the man!


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338942Post plugger66 »

Cairnsman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:


I have no idea why my posts are dumbing you down but I am glad that they are having some effect on you. My dog says hi! He loves the smell of your posts.

I was hoping your dog was typing your posts. Then we could understand the logic. Hi Rin Tin Tin.
Still no idea and still going the man!

And i thought you posted these words. Is it because you never have any idea. Of course that is going the man.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338947Post Cairnsman »

plugger66 wrote:
Cairnsman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:

I was hoping your dog was typing your posts. Then we could understand the logic. Hi Rin Tin Tin.
Still no idea and still going the man!

And i thought you posted these words. Is it because you never have any idea. Of course that is going the man.
A deer with out eyes. What else have you got. I'm bored.


The Bluff
Club Player
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun 05 Dec 2004 1:33am

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338993Post The Bluff »

Cairnsman wrote:He's doing ok IMO but needs to show he's also got some guts and drop senior players that are not trying hard enough. He's shown that he doesn't mind calling them out publicly and so now needs to take the next step and drop them to send a message.
I agree with this, IMO Sam fisher has been very ordinary this year but lack of a suitable replacement probably keeps him in the team. Really need some leadership for our young guys in the backhalf, Roo has certainly given plenty up front.

I believe Scott waters has done a good job. Supporters need to accept where we are at and be patient. Cant see much improvement coming next year and waters should be given 2015 at least to get the team moving up the ladder.


3rd generation saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4661
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
Location: Jurassic Park

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1338997Post 3rd generation saint »

How many here wanted to sack GT after 2 seasons?


Except for the sanity nothing much has been lost.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1339004Post plugger66 »

3rd generation saint wrote:How many here wanted to sack GT after 2 seasons?

Difference and probably nothing to do with either coach is we are still on the way down after SW second ear. After GT second year we were at the bottom. Im unsure will also come up so quickly as we are unlikely to get 2 priorty picks like we did back then.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1339025Post bigcarl »

mad saint guy wrote:Lack of effort and intensity from the players. They aren't playing for him and they aren't buying into the game plan

- The physical condition of the list. The players are weak, thin and unfit compared to every other list in the AFL. The training and strength and conditioning regime obviously isn't up to scratch
Interesting points. I hope you are wrong about both.


saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1339029Post saint6709 »

bigcarl wrote:
mad saint guy wrote:Lack of effort and intensity from the players. They aren't playing for him and they aren't buying into the game plan

- The physical condition of the list. The players are weak, thin and unfit compared to every other list in the AFL. The training and strength and conditioning regime obviously isn't up to scratch
Interesting points. I hope you are wrong about both.
I think we have just been behind the times in terms of recruitment - have gone for light running types - problem is none of them are very fast - and times have moved on you need some real muscle in the midfield and super fast athletes on the outside - our guys are none of these things - hopefully the younger guys will be more like it - we need a brute to play as an on baller - hopefully murdoch can be it - I would be playing simpkin in the centre for the zebs - he's too small for full back and not getting a game anyway - but would be hard tought and BIG as a centreman - probably can't run - but I'd like to find out


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4346
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Re: Anyone who still thinks Watters ...

Post: # 1339041Post cwrcyn »

30 games into Lyon's tenure people were spouting the same stuff, and he had inherited a much better list than Watters.

Admittedly, there are some worrying aspects about the the way the team is performing, most notably in clearances, but I think we need to be realistic about a team that has no genuine key defenders, has only half a dozen players who can play in the midfield, and is depending on a couple of 30 year olds to kick most of its goals.

What did we really expect? Accept reality and forget about putting the coach's head in a guillotine.

Newnes, Ross, Webster, Saunders, Wright, Murdoch and co. will need 30 to 40 games behind them before they truly find their feet, and by that stage Jones, Milne, Hayes, Koschitzke, Schneider, and probably Ray will be gone.

Watters is in a very unenviable position. Give him the time to build a new group. In the meantime, we're going to see some frustrating performances.


Post Reply