Whose Up For A Clearance

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338473Post SydneySainter »

Time to get fair dinkum about McEvoy. Great around the ground, but an ordinary tap ruck at best and he's beyond the point of being a "developing" ruckman.


Bad management is bad management
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338489Post Enrico_Misso »

Minson 46 hitouts

Macca 13 !!!!!!!!!!!


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Macca82
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 1:06pm

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338494Post Macca82 »

How the hell can we lose the centre clearance count 43-26. Our midfield coach has a lot to answer for in terms of our structure. Against carlton in the last qtr we had 3 players in at the centre bounce, and tonight we let Matthew Boyd run riot to end up with 38 touches. We decided to tag griffen with jones, but let boyd do all the damage, would you not think as a coaching group you would put someone on to him. Mac plays his best footy when he is rucking one out and getting a chop out. Tonight the dogs went in with small fwds, and we could have had another small in and left Hickey out. We would have then allowed Rhys to play half in the backline and then in the ruck. We just dont appear to be a fit side, we are constantly being out run in the last qtr.


User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338497Post SydneySainter »

Enrico_Misso wrote:Minson 46 hitouts

Macca 13 !!!!!!!!!!!
And Minson ain't no gun...


Bad management is bad management
vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338498Post vacuous space »

The Bulldogs' clearance advantage was greater than their hitout advantage. Blaming Ben is a giant reach. We were -36 on the ground. We got crushed there. We haven't had a tap ruck since the 02 trade period and I dare anybody to find me a game where we got smacked as hard at the clearances and ground level.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338499Post gringo »

Big Mac just frustrates me with his tap work. I would play Hickey over him as he is at least athletic enough. Fisher should be CHF, Rhys ruck resting forward, Jackson Fergasm needs to go to FB and just get games. Try Mcevoy forward anything that is better than that.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338505Post SaintPav »

Greg T wrote:
Teflon wrote:Anyone?

Let me guess..... we are rebuilding and played a more senior side with experience ??? Cause a midfield containing Dal Santo, Montagna, Hayes, Steven and Jones is inexperienced??

Nup

It was all the umpires fault??

Nup

The umpires are rebuilding??

Nup

Maybe....just maybe..... We don't have the right set ups? The right talent sitting in the coaching box??

I think Watters is a developer who NEEDS help tactically and we aren't helping him

What a disgraceful performance.
Certainly was Teflon ,maybe st pav from wa may enlighten us on the joys of Dean Laidleys coaching skills again ...

I don't need to as I never said he was any good. Show me were I said that?

I really don't remember your posts btw.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338506Post Teflon »

SainterK wrote:Doesn't he lead the comp for contested marks?

Why not in the F50?
I thought the Sydney ruckman Pyke? lead contested marks??????


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338508Post Bernard Shakey »

Clearances are not what todays footy is about. It's all about turnovers and keeping possession. How many games have Geelong won the clearances in?


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338512Post Teflon »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Clearances are not what todays footy is about. It's all about turnovers and keeping possession. How many games have Geelong won the clearances in?
Thats true but I dont think the Cats get smacked in the middle by sides who have won 1 game from their last 19 like we did tonight????

Against Blues almost cost us the game.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338571Post saintsRrising »

vacuous space wrote:The Bulldogs' clearance advantage was greater than their hitout advantage. Blaming Ben is a giant reach. We were -36 on the ground. We got crushed there. We haven't had a tap ruck since the 02 trade period and I dare anybody to find me a game where we got smacked as hard at the clearances and ground level.
In terms of winning and clearing the ball from ruck contests I cannot ever recall a worse midfield performance than what was dished up tonight.
Absolutely smashed.

If we did occasionally win some ball, it was ineffective.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2428
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338585Post SydneySainter »

Could it be that Macca has been poorly coached his whole career?


Bad management is bad management
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338609Post Bernard Shakey »

SydneySainter wrote:Could it be that Macca has been poorly coached his whole career?
He's not a tap ruckman and probably never will be.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4344
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338611Post cwrcyn »

Some basic set up issues at stoppages. Boyd on the defensive side of each stoppage and in particular, each centre bounce completely open his own and allowed to position himself as he wished? -outcome - masses of very telling centre clearances. This issue was apparent by quarter time, yet at no stage was there anything done about it.

Also, why, in the Bulldogs' forward line, was there a spare Bulldogs player left free in the centre corridor to receive a handball from the stoppage in almost every forward line stoppage - result - about 5 goals to the Bulldogs. This is such basic stuff that is done in the under 18 competition.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338618Post Teflon »

cwrcyn wrote:Some basic set up issues at stoppages. Boyd on the defensive side of each stoppage and in particular, each centre bounce completely open his own and allowed to position himself as he wished? -outcome - masses of very telling centre clearances. This issue was apparent by quarter time, yet at no stage was there anything done about it.

Also, why, in the Bulldogs' forward line, was there a spare Bulldogs player left free in the centre corridor to receive a handball from the stoppage in almost every forward line stoppage - result - about 5 goals to the Bulldogs. This is such basic stuff that is done in the under 18 competition.
Well thats apparently, according to St Trav, cause we have the best in the business in Dean Laidley in charge of our mids..........same guy who looked after Port so well last year........amazing how theyve gone since they cleaned out a bunch of coaching duds.

Isnt it ironic........Chad Cornes is a new player again..........and now Dal Santo apparently cant get a kick and is shyte?????? why?????


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
battye
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5926
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 1:36pm
Contact:

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338621Post battye »

Teflon wrote:Isnt it ironic........Chad Cornes is a new player again..........and now Dal Santo apparently cant get a kick and is shyte?????? why?????
Huh? Has Cornes even played this year?


Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!

TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview

Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7934
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 548 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338624Post bobmurray »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SydneySainter wrote:Could it be that Macca has been poorly coached his whole career?
He's not a tap ruckman and probably never will be.
he's only young is the ongoing excuse on here...have we ditched that now... i need to keep up with continually changing opinions...

i wish we had less experts..it would make it easier to stay informed..

What is an expert......maybeexperts aren't a reliable source of info..too bad really...who else can we rely on...forums are full of ?

hardly fills one with confidence... :roll: :roll:


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
vacuous space
SS Life Member
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 162 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338628Post vacuous space »

bobmurray wrote:he's only young is the ongoing excuse on here...
Hitouts don't correlate with clearances which don't correlate with wins. Ben's really good at things that matter, so if there's an 'excuse' for him, it's that. BS is right, he probably won't ever be a tap ruckman. It probably won't ever matter either.


Yeah nah pleasing positive
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338630Post Teflon »

battye wrote:
Teflon wrote:Isnt it ironic........Chad Cornes is a new player again..........and now Dal Santo apparently cant get a kick and is shyte?????? why?????
Huh? Has Cornes even played this year?
apologies Kane Cornes who is avergaing 28 DISPOSALS a game......he was at cross roads last year.....now 8th in league for disposals this year.


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338635Post Teflon »

vacuous space wrote:
bobmurray wrote:he's only young is the ongoing excuse on here...
Hitouts don't correlate with clearances which don't correlate with wins. Ben's really good at things that matter, so if there's an 'excuse' for him, it's that. BS is right, he probably won't ever be a tap ruckman. It probably won't ever matter either.
Them why not stick a midget in at the centre bounce? simply forfeit every tapout.....it doesnt matter right?

I find that strange...sure, it may not decide the final clearance but you have to wonder what damage a good ruck who can out it to advantage can do.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Greg T
Club Player
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 825 times
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Whose Up For A Clearance

Post: # 1338639Post Greg T »

cwrcyn wrote:Some basic set up issues at stoppages. Boyd on the defensive side of each stoppage and in particular, each centre bounce completely open his own and allowed to position himself as he wished? -outcome - masses of very telling centre clearances. This issue was apparent by quarter time, yet at no stage was there anything done about it.

Also, why, in the Bulldogs' forward line, was there a spare Bulldogs player left free in the centre corridor to receive a handball from the stoppage in almost every forward line stoppage - result - about 5 goals to the Bulldogs. This is such basic stuff that is done in the under 18 competition.
Stoppages cost us 10 goals tonite ...very poor


100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
Post Reply