Hickey? !!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Hickey? !!
On tonight's showing, definitely NOT a forward. Didn't look up to standard as a ruckman either. Has a long way to go !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Re: Hickey? !!
Just need to keep playing him He's vary raw but shows some natural talent and awareness in brief patches. Keep playing him. Keep Maister out unless we are well short of talls.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4947
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 496 times
Re: Hickey? !!
Cairnsman wrote:Just need to keep playing him He's vary raw but shows some natural talent and awareness in brief patches. Keep playing him. Keep Maister out unless we are well short of talls.
Agree with both these points. Hickey was disappointing tonight but has to keep playing, and Maister......I would have preferred Siposs from the start. I know Rutten would have monstered him, but I would prefer siposs run Rutten around and get beat than stand there and get beat like Maister did tonight.
- 8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Hickey? !!
He's still very young. He will be ok.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Hickey? !!
The only thing is that Siposs can't run more than 5 yards. And I like the boy.Moods wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Just need to keep playing him He's vary raw but shows some natural talent and awareness in brief patches. Keep playing him. Keep Maister out unless we are well short of talls.
Agree with both these points. Hickey was disappointing tonight but has to keep playing, and Maister......I would have preferred Siposs from the start. I know Rutten would have monstered him, but I would prefer siposs run Rutten around and get beat than stand there and get beat like Maister did tonight.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Re: Hickey? !!
Hickey has a long way to go.... And he will never be a forwards ass.... Cannot take a grab
He is a tap Ruckman only, and nowhere near as good as McEvoy as a #1.... Can't be a #2 because he will be a liability anywhere else....
Tonight he was shocking really
He is a tap Ruckman only, and nowhere near as good as McEvoy as a #1.... Can't be a #2 because he will be a liability anywhere else....
Tonight he was shocking really
Re: Hickey? !!
BigMart wrote:Hickey has a long way to go.... And he will never be a forwards ass.... Cannot take a grab
He is a tap Ruckman only, and nowhere near as good as McEvoy as a #1.... Can't be a #2 because he will be a liability anywhere else....
Tonight he was shocking really
You should post more.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Hickey? !!
The elephant in the room here is McEvoy
90% game time, 8 disposals, 15 hitouts, 50 DT points
Hickey (an absolute junior)
75% game time, 9 disposals, 4 hitouts 45 DT points
I expect Hickey to have some shockers at this stage, will probably take many games before he becomes consistent.
Pretty ordinary stuff from our supposed skipper in waiting though.
90% game time, 8 disposals, 15 hitouts, 50 DT points
Hickey (an absolute junior)
75% game time, 9 disposals, 4 hitouts 45 DT points
I expect Hickey to have some shockers at this stage, will probably take many games before he becomes consistent.
Pretty ordinary stuff from our supposed skipper in waiting though.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Hickey? !!
agreeCairnsman wrote:Just need to keep playing him He's vary raw but shows some natural talent and awareness in brief patches. Keep playing him. Keep Maister out unless we are well short of talls.
- saintkid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1804
- Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 312 times
Re: Hickey? !!
BigMart wrote:Hickey has a long way to go.... And he will never be a forwards ass.... Cannot take a grab
He is a tap Ruckman only, and nowhere near as good as McEvoy as a #1.... Can't be a #2 because he will be a liability anywhere else....
Tonight he was shocking really
What he said. As I posted on the match thread hope he proves me wrong but I can't see a glimpse of why they felt compelled to give up so much for Hickey.
Re: Hickey? !!
Should of looked for a fwd Ruckman.... Actually we have a really good one of those playing FB so perhaps a key defender for Pick 12 and not a #1 Ruckman.... List composition is important.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Re: Hickey? !!
CANNOT kick !!!
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4567
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Hickey? !!
This.SainterK wrote:I ridiculed Mick for pretending Hampson is a forward, and we go and do the same.
Needs to ruck. But we have a ruckman already. Hmm
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
Re: Hickey? !!
I'll probably have to duck for cover, but give him a crack at it for one week.dcstkfc wrote:This.SainterK wrote:I ridiculed Mick for pretending Hampson is a forward, and we go and do the same.
Needs to ruck. But we have a ruckman already. Hmm
Played immensely better in the last quarter v the Blues when the #1...
I'm curious as to how he works with our mids, not how he works in the F50.
Re: Hickey? !!
SainterK wrote:I'll probably have to duck for cover, but give him a crack at it for one week.dcstkfc wrote:This.SainterK wrote:I ridiculed Mick for pretending Hampson is a forward, and we go and do the same.
Needs to ruck. But we have a ruckman already. Hmm
Played immensely better in the last quarter v the Blues when the #1...
I'm curious as to how he works with our mids, not how he works in the F50.
Ben was clearly in the best 3 last week. maybe you need to watch the game again. Ben deserves and will be number one ruckman. If Hickey cant play forward then he doesnt play but we dont ruck him because he cant play forward.
Re: Hickey? !!
Yeah, but how much of this impact on the game was in the ruck?plugger66 wrote:Ben was clearly in the best 3 last week. maybe you need to watch the game again. Ben deserves and will be number one ruckman. If Hickey cant play forward then he doesnt play but we dont ruck him because he cant play forward.
He is a RUCKman, and I'm yet convinced on his hitouts, and work in the centre circle....our mids seem equally confused, we just cannot rely on pressuring the ball carrier every week, and chasing the ball winner.
Re: Hickey? !!
SainterK wrote:Yeah, but how much of this impact on the game was in the ruck?plugger66 wrote:Ben was clearly in the best 3 last week. maybe you need to watch the game again. Ben deserves and will be number one ruckman. If Hickey cant play forward then he doesnt play but we dont ruck him because he cant play forward.
He is a RUCKman, and I'm yet convinced on his hitouts, and work in the centre circle....our mids seem equally confused, we just cannot rely on pressuring the ball carrier every week, and chasing the ball winner.
So were does Ben play?
Re: Hickey? !!
plugger66 wrote:SainterK wrote:plugger66 wrote: So were does Ben play?
'around the ground' is a term used to justify his position, but we are still being murdered in the middle. Ruckmans HAVE to dominate the ruck to justify their spot, don't they?
Re: Hickey? !!
So where does ben play?SainterK wrote:plugger66 wrote:
'around the ground' is a term used to justify his position, but we are still being murdered in the middle. Ruckmans HAVE to dominate the ruck to justify their spot, don't they?
Re: Hickey? !!
Meh.plugger66 wrote:So where does ben play?SainterK wrote:plugger66 wrote:
'around the ground' is a term used to justify his position, but we are still being murdered in the middle. Ruckmans HAVE to dominate the ruck to justify their spot, don't they?
I'll brave it.
Sandy, for at least a week...to see how Hickey goes as our ruck.
Seen guys like Goldstein dropped, because modern footy is so dependant on these guys giving the mids an advantage.
Re: Hickey? !!
Starting to look like we payed overs...can't carry a No.2 ruckman who can't play elsewhere now that there's only three interchange
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4567
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Hickey? !!
Deep forward? can't possibly be worse than Beau.plugger66 wrote:So where does ben play?SainterK wrote:plugger66 wrote:
'around the ground' is a term used to justify his position, but we are still being murdered in the middle. Ruckmans HAVE to dominate the ruck to justify their spot, don't they?