i dont think anyone even the MRP fully understand how the MRP works ... but i based my assesment of 3 weeks on the fact it was a head hit it was a deliberate hit and Kosi has a preety poor record ... but hey im only an armchair criticsaintspremiers wrote:st Trav why should've it been classed as high impact ?
That's the only way he would've got 3 weeks.
Please explain, or don't you understand how the MRP works ?
MRP
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: MRP
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
-
8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: MRP
If he just "belted" him in the shoulder/side would he have got weeks? No. Intentional or not. I don't think he tried to whack him in the head. Just my opinion.Life Long Saint wrote:But his intention was to belt him, though?CURLY wrote:Life Long Saint wrote: Not relevant.
The conduct is intentional.
The contact was high.
The impact is medium.
Those three facts are not in dispute.
He doesn't get off just because his aim is lousy.
It's unfortunate for the big fella but it was a stupid act and now he pays the price.
Just like Milne's act last week was stupid.
No one is saying he didnt deserve weeks. What I am saying is his sole intention wasnt to belt him in the head.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: MRP
It was classed as Intentional. Which means deliberate. So you are wrong.CURLY wrote:Clearly the MRP agrees with me in regards to Kosi. Never was it a deliberate strike to the head.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: MRP
Or the MRP are wrong.saintspremiers wrote:It was classed as Intentional. Which means deliberate. So you are wrong.CURLY wrote:Clearly the MRP agrees with me in regards to Kosi. Never was it a deliberate strike to the head.
In a court of law the case would be thrown out. He intentionally tried to hit him, but not in the head. Would be easily proven with the hight differences and the fact he got his shoulder first. The fact Kosi is a bit awkward wouldn't even need to be brought up.Back me up Stinger.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Re: MRP
CURLY wrote:People get confused. Yes Kosi was alway going to get weeks. No it wasn't a deliberate hit to the head.
You are guessing that. The MRP panel said it was deliberate and he hit the head so it sounds pretty much a deliberate hit to the head.
-
8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: MRP
Turn it up Plugger. There is only one group doing the guessing. MRP also said Judd's hit on Pav didn't have sufficient force. Are you seriously saying because the MRP said so, it must be true. There are 100's of examples. What were you on while you were away. I thought you were better than that.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:People get confused. Yes Kosi was alway going to get weeks. No it wasn't a deliberate hit to the head.
You are guessing that. The MRP panel said it was deliberate and he hit the head so it sounds pretty much a deliberate hit to the head.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10515
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: MRP
The action was deliberate but where he hit him wasn't.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:People get confused. Yes Kosi was alway going to get weeks. No it wasn't a deliberate hit to the head.
You are guessing that. The MRP panel said it was deliberate and he hit the head so it sounds pretty much a deliberate hit to the head.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: MRP
8856brother wrote:Turn it up Plugger. There is only one group doing the guessing. MRP also said Judd's hit on Pav didn't have sufficient force. Are you seriously saying because the MRP said so, it must be true. There are 100's of examples. What were you on while you were away. I thought you were better than that.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:People get confused. Yes Kosi was alway going to get weeks. No it wasn't a deliberate hit to the head.
You are guessing that. The MRP panel said it was deliberate and he hit the head so it sounds pretty much a deliberate hit to the head.
No I reckon more on here have said it was deliberate too and they are Saints supporters. Pretty sure most neutrals would say it was the correct call.
Re: MRP
CURLY wrote:The action was deliberate but where he hit him wasn't.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:People get confused. Yes Kosi was alway going to get weeks. No it wasn't a deliberate hit to the head.
You are guessing that. The MRP panel said it was deliberate and he hit the head so it sounds pretty much a deliberate hit to the head.
Sorry but you wouldnt have a clue on that and neither would any of us so as you agree it was deliberate then they got it right.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10515
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: MRP
[quote="plu
Sorry but you wouldnt have a clue on that and neither would any of us so as you agree it was deliberate then they got it right.[/quote]
Who said they got it wrong? If the MRP thought Kosi deliberately hit him in the head he'd have gotten more than two.
Sorry but you wouldnt have a clue on that and neither would any of us so as you agree it was deliberate then they got it right.[/quote]
Who said they got it wrong? If the MRP thought Kosi deliberately hit him in the head he'd have gotten more than two.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: MRP
Who said they got it wrong? If the MRP thought Kosi deliberately hit him in the head he'd have gotten more than two.[/quote]CURLY wrote:[quote="plu
Sorry but you wouldnt have a clue on that and neither would any of us so as you agree it was deliberate then they got it right.
Can you tell us how he would have got more? It isnt possible.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10515
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Re: MRP
plugger66 wrote:Who said they got it wrong? If the MRP thought Kosi deliberately hit him in the head he'd have gotten more than two.CURLY wrote:[quote="plu
Sorry but you wouldnt have a clue on that and neither would any of us so as you agree it was deliberate then they got it right.
Can you tell us how he would have got more? It isnt possible.[/quote]
Is two the maximum penalty is it, funny I've seen blokes get 3-4-5 plus before.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: MRP
Is two the maximum penalty is it, funny I've seen blokes get 3-4-5 plus before.[/quote]CURLY wrote:plugger66 wrote:Who said they got it wrong? If the MRP thought Kosi deliberately hit him in the head he'd have gotten more than two.CURLY wrote:[quote="plu
Sorry but you wouldnt have a clue on that and neither would any of us so as you agree it was deliberate then they got it right.
Can you tell us how he would have got more? It isnt possible.
No I think you could get life. i would be interested how Kosi could possibly get more weeks if the tribunal knew the hit to the head was deliberate. I reckon you might have trouble explaining it to me.
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: MRP
can someone please explain the change in the rule where his carry over was not taken into account?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8395
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1913 times
- Been thanked: 890 times
Re: MRP
I am happy he only got 2, he takes the heat off the Captain, less chance of gettin triple-teamed.
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: MRP
I spoke to a Tigers fan today who was complaining that Luke darcy especially and a few other free to air commentators make judgement like they are the tribunal. I thought like this guy it was a crude attempt at holding him up in a poorly timed shepherd. It connected and wasn't pretty but I think they got it about right at the MRP. nice change. the ones that s*** me are the ones like the tackles that are sometimes ok sometimes not. I want consistency like with the umpires. Not completely out of step with other rulings.