Good coaching match up?!
No
Wrong match up
CJ at Full Back
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: CJ at Full Back
I reckon SW has every defensive match ups wrong starting with the 197cm Gumbleton
That alone has cost 3 goals
That alone has cost 3 goals
-
SuperDuper
- Club Player
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: CJ at Full Back
So let me get this straight
We supposedly have a 200cm defender now
In the last quarter the bombers have a 202 and 197cm tall fwd line and we use the tall defender as a ruck man
Have our 200cm ruck man playing fwd like a big robot?
I gave SW the benefit of the doubt until some of the most bizarre selections/match ups I've ever seen
SW was as bad as some of the players
We supposedly have a 200cm defender now
In the last quarter the bombers have a 202 and 197cm tall fwd line and we use the tall defender as a ruck man
Have our 200cm ruck man playing fwd like a big robot?
I gave SW the benefit of the doubt until some of the most bizarre selections/match ups I've ever seen
SW was as bad as some of the players
Re: CJ at Full Back
not sure what jones is giving us, rather curren or ledger to learn their craft
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
Re: CJ at Full Back
Watters has had a shocker. The late changes were strange as have been the match ups.
-
Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: CJ at Full Back
agreeBigMart wrote:So let me get this straight
We supposedly have a 200cm defender now
In the last quarter the bombers have a 202 and 197cm tall fwd line and we use the tall defender as a ruck man
Have our 200cm ruck man playing fwd like a big robot?
I gave SW the benefit of the doubt until some of the most bizarre selections/match ups I've ever seen
SW was as bad as some of the players
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
-
Moorabbin Man
- Club Player
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2011 1:31pm
Re: CJ at Full Back
My patience is wearing thin with Watters, bizarre selections (why the f**k didn't Lee play?), ludicrous match ups and non existent defensive attitude. I think we may have stuffed up in not appointing Hinkley.
Re: CJ at Full Back
Was close to one of our worst , he always puts players in trouble with his hesitation with the ball in his hands ...lets hope Ledger or Dunnel get a game before him cause if he was tagging Watson I'm sure they could do just as good... 2009 was set up for him but noe he's getting found out !!!luc1966 wrote:f@#@ give jones some credit where its due he was good tonight
Jack Newnes happy to be a Saint !!!! PS and to hit a target !!!
-
spert
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Re: CJ at Full Back
What game were you watching?Middo wrote:Was close to one of our worst , he always puts players in trouble with his hesitation with the ball in his hands ...lets hope Ledger or Dunnel get a game before him cause if he was tagging Watson I'm sure they could do just as good... 2009 was set up for him but noe he's getting found out !!!luc1966 wrote:f@#@ give jones some credit where its due he was good tonight
Re: CJ at Full Back
You do realise Jones was running with Jobe who had 31 and two goals in the third
However, not his fault.... 183 and 80 vs 190 and 90 .... And a fair difference in strength and ability
CJ should have tailed Stanton as he's done successfully in the past
However, not his fault.... 183 and 80 vs 190 and 90 .... And a fair difference in strength and ability
CJ should have tailed Stanton as he's done successfully in the past
-
The Redeemer
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: CJ at Full Back
Why the fcuk is the retard still in the team?BigMart wrote:Good coaching match up?!
No
Wrong match up
he gets touches because opposition coaches don't care if he touches the ball because he is absolutely awful
drop, delist, kill.
Re: CJ at Full Back
Well that escalated quicklyThe Redeemer wrote:Why the fcuk is the retard still in the team?BigMart wrote:Good coaching match up?!
No
Wrong match up
he gets touches because opposition coaches don't care if he touches the ball because he is absolutely awful
drop, delist, kill.
-
8856brother
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4374
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
- Location: Twin Peaks
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: CJ at Full Back
The Redeemer wrote:Why the fcuk is the retard still in the team?BigMart wrote:Good coaching match up?!
No
Wrong match up
he gets touches because opposition coaches don't care if he touches the ball because he is absolutely awful
drop, delist, kill.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
Re: CJ at Full Back
BigMart wrote:Good coaching match up?!
No
Wrong match up
Was there for 10 seconds. It happens in games but it is SW fault. He should have called a time out. Anyone who thinks SW wanted CJ to be at FB for even 10 seconds just is looking for reasons to bag anyone and anything.