Irrevelent(Melbourne)

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
murray 66
Club Player
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:26pm
Been thanked: 24 times

Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315465Post murray 66 »

I know it is a saint topic board, but I don't feel sorry for the Dees.They have had more draft picks then I can remember from any team.
The mistake they made was getting rid of their leaders (McDonald,Bruce,Green,Robertson ect......).How can Watts,Trengrove,Grimes have time to learn when their idiotic board cull so much experience so quickly.
Neeld is a spastic and should stick to teaching????

C'mon Sainters...................


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315472Post The Redeemer »

murray 66 wrote:I know it is a saint topic board, but I don't feel sorry for the Dees.They have had more draft picks then I can remember from any team.
The mistake they made was getting rid of their leaders (McDonald,Bruce,Green,Robertson ect......).How can Watts,Trengrove,Grimes have time to learn when their idiotic board cull so much experience so quickly.
Neeld is a spastic and should stick to teaching????

C'mon Sainters...................
Grimes is not a leaders a-hole.

He plays loose as either a flanker or when he actually does play as a tagger, his opponent gets best on despite Grimes getting a bit of the ball


asaint
Club Player
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat 09 Oct 2010 8:51pm

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315482Post asaint »

Well,they are probably just treating the game as a training drill as every team that plays the Bummers should. Their good form is not really a true indication as all clubs know they will be awarded the points anyway once they are rubbed out for drug cheating.


User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315491Post ShanghaiSaint »

murray 66 wrote:I know it is a saint topic board, but I don't feel sorry for the Dees.They have had more draft picks then I can remember from any team.
The mistake they made was getting rid of their leaders (McDonald,Bruce,Green,Robertson ect......).How can Watts,Trengrove,Grimes have time to learn when their idiotic board cull so much experience so quickly.
Neeld is a spastic and should stick to teaching????

C'mon Sainters...................
Yep either do I... they have had top picks and done nothing...... watts was subbed tonight... :shock:


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315495Post dragit »

I feel sorry for their fans… I remember watching us get belted like that as a kid… hope we don't have to suffer like that again.

Pretty poor though, asking Bailey to tank, then sacking him.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315497Post BigMart »

Pity

No!


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7938
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 549 times
Been thanked: 254 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315502Post bobmurray »

Melbourne = incompetence to the extreme...

How does a club go there.....


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315532Post SainterK »

Everyone talking about dees on not the other elephant in the room?

Dons could be top 4 this year, I can't rationalise that


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315534Post suss »

SainterK wrote:Everyone talking about dees on not the other elephant in the room?

Dons could be top 4 this year, I can't rationalise that
Dees are putrid and I think Adelaide won't be as good as anticipated. I'd like to see them finish 9th.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315537Post The Redeemer »

SainterK wrote:Everyone talking about dees on not the other elephant in the room?

Dons could be top 4 this year, I can't rationalise that
Absolutely not.

At best they have a list like say the Crows of 2012 or the Dogs of 2009-2011. Yey we make the finals and play in a prelim but are we a realistic shot at winning the Grand Finals?

No. No chance in hell.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315538Post plugger66 »

I repeat I dont get it. i suppose that is what happens when you are on the way down. You look for sides going even worse.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315541Post saintsRrising »

Ironic TV (charity) ad at present.

Shows the Melbourne players "asleep at the G".


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315553Post Enrico_Misso »

Desperately sad night for Melbourne people.
I felt so sorry for their fans.
Especially losing to a bunch of cheats like Pissndung.

But their incompetence is unbelievable.
They dismissed their leaders.
Tanked to get prime draft picks.
Then picked rubbish.
Some of whom they couldn't even retain.
Their culture is now distorted by the tanking.
Half their members hide behind MCC membership and won't fully commit.
Their previous major sponsor turned out to be a racist fraud.
They are leaderless on the field.
and leaderless off the field.

I fear what will become of them.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
Bluto
Club Player
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun 22 Jul 2012 10:06am
Location: Faber University
Contact:

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315561Post Bluto »

Why would a saint supporter feel sorry for any club accept our own. By comparison Melbourne are traveling quite well looking at them holistically compared to the Saints. We have one premiership, they have twelve (with 2 x three-peats). But we do have twice the amount of wooden spoons than them (including a four-peat & six-peat). And this season to date...two matches played for two losses. I really find it hard to throw stones and criticize other clubs sometimes when history shows that St Kilda have certainly been no world beaters.


ImageImage
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315588Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:I repeat I dont get it. i suppose that is what happens when you are on the way down. You look for sides going even worse.

You should be in your element- depressingly keen to talk about the inevitable slide and how long we will be down. You're not a motivational speaker are you. We might slide but we seem to be trying to rebuild while staying competitive. Barring injury we should be 8 to 13 imo at the end of the year but can't see us getting smashed every week with no competition offered.

Melbourne are the team under pressure after the first 2 weeks because they look worse than they have after years of top picks. They took Toumpas over Wines who is a mate of Viney? WTF is wrong with their decision making?


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315593Post Cairnsman »

plugger66 wrote:I repeat I dont get it. i suppose that is what happens when you are on the way down. You look for sides going even worse.

Yep! and also I wouldn't be getting too cocky about Melbourne's loss to the Dons, we play them in round 4.


mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315597Post mullet »

SainterK wrote:Everyone talking about dees on not the other elephant in the room?

Dons could be top 4 this year, I can't rationalise that
Until all their points are taken away from them. Investigation is still ongoing , it is not going away.

Will not comment on Melbourne or their "culture" as I dont believe in "culture". Hate it when people kick us so wont kick them for struggling.

Will however kick a team that is embroiled in cheating. Interesting if it was Stkilda or Melbourne or Doggies with this Asada investigation, if it would have disappeared from
the papers so quickly. I think not. Look how they ran with lies from a 17 year old. Still waiting for an apology Gilbo????


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315598Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:I repeat I dont get it. i suppose that is what happens when you are on the way down. You look for sides going even worse.

You should be in your element- depressingly keen to talk about the inevitable slide and how long we will be down. You're not a motivational speaker are you. We might slide but we seem to be trying to rebuild while staying competitive. Barring injury we should be 8 to 13 imo at the end of the year but can't see us getting smashed every week with no competition offered.

Melbourne are the team under pressure after the first 2 weeks because they look worse than they have after years of top picks. They took Toumpas over Wines who is a mate of Viney? WTF is wrong with their decision making?

Its a Saints forum so i dont get why we mention Melbourne firstly and I thought we were supposed to give our thoughts on the Saints.

people say I dont give my opinions but obviously you think I do. And yes my opinion is we will slide. Maybe we should only give our thoughts if we are going up the ladder. No Im not a motivational speaker. Are you a recruiter because I think you have no clocked up your 100th recruit that will be good for us. Pity you only get about 10 and sometimes you have to actually make decisions.

As for Tompas over Wines, its 2 weeks or should we say Hickey and Lee are wasted picks?


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315604Post borderbarry »

Actually Toumpas was more highly fancied than WInes. I can see why Melbourne would have taken him. I just wish we had had the opportunity to get one of them. Just what the Saints need.


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315608Post Old Mate »

Toumpas was just behind Whitfield in most recruiters eyes. The Saints wanted him and were close to making a deal with GWS to get an early pick to select him. I feel being selected by the Dees will starve his potential.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315610Post bergholt »

SainterK wrote:Everyone talking about dees on not the other elephant in the room?

Dons could be top 4 this year, I can't rationalise that
I understand your concern, but in our society we usually wait for a conviction before assuming someone's guilty.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315625Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:I repeat I dont get it. i suppose that is what happens when you are on the way down. You look for sides going even worse.

You should be in your element- depressingly keen to talk about the inevitable slide and how long we will be down. You're not a motivational speaker are you. We might slide but we seem to be trying to rebuild while staying competitive. Barring injury we should be 8 to 13 imo at the end of the year but can't see us getting smashed every week with no competition offered.

Melbourne are the team under pressure after the first 2 weeks because they look worse than they have after years of top picks. They took Toumpas over Wines who is a mate of Viney? WTF is wrong with their decision making?

Its a Saints forum so i dont get why we mention Melbourne firstly and I thought we were supposed to give our thoughts on the Saints.

people say I dont give my opinions but obviously you think I do. And yes my opinion is we will slide. Maybe we should only give our thoughts if we are going up the ladder. No Im not a motivational speaker. Are you a recruiter because I think you have no clocked up your 100th recruit that will be good for us. Pity you only get about 10 and sometimes you have to actually make decisions.

As for Tompas over Wines, its 2 weeks or should we say Hickey and Lee are wasted picks?
I don't think either are bad picks- melbourne needs grunt and got another soft outside runner. Wines and Jack Viney were just what they needed.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315627Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:

You should be in your element- depressingly keen to talk about the inevitable slide and how long we will be down. You're not a motivational speaker are you. We might slide but we seem to be trying to rebuild while staying competitive. Barring injury we should be 8 to 13 imo at the end of the year but can't see us getting smashed every week with no competition offered.

Melbourne are the team under pressure after the first 2 weeks because they look worse than they have after years of top picks. They took Toumpas over Wines who is a mate of Viney? WTF is wrong with their decision making?

Its a Saints forum so i dont get why we mention Melbourne firstly and I thought we were supposed to give our thoughts on the Saints.

people say I dont give my opinions but obviously you think I do. And yes my opinion is we will slide. Maybe we should only give our thoughts if we are going up the ladder. No Im not a motivational speaker. Are you a recruiter because I think you have no clocked up your 100th recruit that will be good for us. Pity you only get about 10 and sometimes you have to actually make decisions.

As for Tompas over Wines, its 2 weeks or should we say Hickey and Lee are wasted picks?
I don't think either are bad picks- melbourne needs grunt and got another soft outside runner. Wines and Jack Viney were just what they needed.

Maybe they made a wise decision not to have 2 players who pretty much play the same way. In the long run they will need outside runners.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315628Post saintspremiers »

It's hard to beat a good wine (or whine for that matter!)


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Re: Irrevelent(Melbourne)

Post: # 1315691Post saintsRrising »

Before we get too cocky, if we play like we did against the Suns against the Dons we will be in for a pummeling too.

Tigers we were much better, but still short of the mark.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Post Reply