I can't understand that either, I thought he would be one of the first defenders selectedMC Gusto wrote:Don't understand why simpkin is not in???
Team vs Richmond
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Re: Team vs Richmond
I love this club
Re: Team vs Richmond
Good question matrix, Roberton or dempster I guess...
I also doubt fisher is right, one of those times you appreciate the Blake...
Poor jimmy, was looking good too
I also doubt fisher is right, one of those times you appreciate the Blake...
Poor jimmy, was looking good too
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4080
- Joined: Wed 20 Feb 2008 8:26pm
- Location: Morwell Gippsland Australia
- Contact:
Re: Team vs Richmond
SimpkonSainterK wrote:Simpson was missing most of the nab cup, maybe they won't rush him
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
True but a win would be handy alsospert wrote:A pity the inclusions don't include at least one younger player- we do really need to keep blooding the young guys.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
If they don't come in then give us the 3 alternatives?realdeal wrote:Do we really believe that Schneider, Dempster and Fisher all come in at the same time after interrupted pre-seasons? Watters has a history of 'late withdrwrals'.
Unfortunately, I highly doubt Fisher plays and I think Simpkin will come in.
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
yeah could be robertson
big ask in what? your second game??
wont be blake, good lord i love the blake but, please....not the blake, or gilbert
maybe JJ???
but i like your idea of chucking him in the middle K
give him a crack i reckon
big ask in what? your second game??
wont be blake, good lord i love the blake but, please....not the blake, or gilbert
maybe JJ???
but i like your idea of chucking him in the middle K
give him a crack i reckon
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
SimpkinRalphy wrote:SimpkonSainterK wrote:Simpson was missing most of the nab cup, maybe they won't rush him
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
Re: Team vs Richmond
Blake will be the second ruck. If Fisher doesnt play Simpkin comes in and either way Stanley has to play back. Why give him one week back and the next forward. He isnt a Yo Yo.
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8186
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 629 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
Not good enoughSainterK wrote:Sorry iPhone predictive text
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Team vs Richmond
I still believe that Kosi should have come in if Hickey is out. Otherwise I am happy with the squad.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: Team vs Richmond
I just checked the Zebras team on their website,and they have both Jones and Milera in the Sandy team for Sunday. What the??????
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
Most likely Blake vs Simpkin....and they went for Blake so he can relieve Ben in the ruck.SAAD wrote:What the hell in relation to Simpkin...we need him...
Stanley to stay on Vickery
Fisher to take out Roo2.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
Well one could say they kept Newnes in despite a dreadful game....to continue to develop him.spert wrote:A pity the inclusions don't include at least one younger player- we do really need to keep blooding the young guys.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Team vs Richmond
Simkin has had an interupted pre-season and I don't think he played in any of the nab cup game. That would suggest that he is UNDER-DONE and would need to build his match conditioning with at least a couple of games at Sandy !!Saintmania wrote:Someone want to tell me why Simpkin is not an automatic inclusion? He was one of our best/toughest last year.
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 624
- Joined: Thu 13 Nov 2008 8:06pm
Re: Team vs Richmond
Don't understand why Blake is playing ahead of Simpkin, unless they want him to second ruck to keep Stanley down back. In fact Blake should purely be in the team for depth purposes only and only play games like last week, because we had three important defenders out.
Also, we are really struggling for midfielders at the moment. I can only really count 6 players, maybe 7 who can have substantial time in the middle. You really need close to 10.
Also, we are really struggling for midfielders at the moment. I can only really count 6 players, maybe 7 who can have substantial time in the middle. You really need close to 10.
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
Regarding Gwilt, if it's his crook knee, then it is something of real concern at this early stage of the year. We really need his experience/stability on the backline.
Like others, not sure about Fisher - could be Fisher out, Simpkin in.
Like others, not sure about Fisher - could be Fisher out, Simpkin in.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Team vs Richmond
Simpkin missed the preseason and came straight intothe sandy squad and I assume has played two games of vfl footy only. Not got any fitness base.
Re: Team vs Richmond
How many defenders can you fit into one side? Already Fisher, Dempster, Roberton, Blake, Geary, Stanley. Fisher and Dempster are better, Stanley is taller, Blake is stronger and Geary and Roberton are more mobile. I love the guy but I'm not sure what his point of difference is.SAAD wrote:What the hell in relation to Simpkin...we need him...