Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.dragit wrote:How did you guess, I am both a 13 year old moron.SaintPav wrote:BTW, I really like your avatar. You're either 13 or a moron.
I won't ridicule you pav, you make a fool of yourself well enough on your own.
Why don't you tell us all how we should post a bit more, that's good fun.
It will do. Touched a nerve have I.dragit wrote:correct… was a reference to Scotty Watters favourites…matrix wrote:maybe he likes waffles????
What sort of picture would you prefer pav?
What don't you hear?SaintPav wrote: That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.
I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
only if you go and eat a waffle.dragit wrote:What don't you hear?SaintPav wrote: That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.
I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
Take what? being called a moron?
You're really starting to babble… might be time for a nap.
winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whingingSainterK wrote:Yes and no...
We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?
The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
I can't find anything to say Armstrong tested positive...did find this which seems to suggest he didn't....sunsaint wrote:winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whingingSainterK wrote:Yes and no...
We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?
The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
Say what?saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series
people pick and choose to satisfy their biassunsaint wrote:winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whingingSainterK wrote:Yes and no...
We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?
The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
ozrulestrace wrote:Say what?saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series
Collingwood are partners with the Holden Racing team - cars have to carry their logo-- check side window of the carOld Mate wrote:ozrulestrace wrote:Say what?saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series
U wot m8?
plus another.barks4eva wrote: The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
Can we have a link to this statement? I know there were a couple of journos on the case, but I never saw an AFL statement.Iceman234 wrote:plus another.barks4eva wrote: The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
Can' believe I agree with you re-Collingwood. Don't agree with your comments about the board though.barks4eva wrote:We're Collingwood players on the juice in 2010 ?
Is the pope catholic?
The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
And our cheese eating surrender monkey board did nothing
They should have demanded a thorough independent investigation not run by the AFL
The filth should have been thoroughly investigated, exposed and found out to be the filthy scum cheats they are and would have a second premiership
You know it makes sense
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
i know its probably not politically correct but use of the word 'nuffy' always makes me laugh without fail.matrix wrote:a 13 year old nuffy by the sounds of it
but that could prob get you and in trouble
