Illicit drug loophole - which club?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296037Post matrix »

good lord
how far behind in the times are u pluggsy

1923???

F*** me :roll:


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296038Post plugger66 »

matrix wrote:good lord
how far behind in the times are u pluggsy

1923???

F*** me :roll:
Why is that? What have I said that is incorrect? Come out with some sort of fact for a change.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296042Post matrix »

wtf are you on about??

the stuff steviesaint and gringo are talking about f****** happens pluggsy
its seen and happens and its seen by quite a few people

and your answer is
how come no one has taken a photo with a camera phone seeing as they are everywheres nowdays


LMFAO!!
either you are
1. baiting and just being a simple flog
2.a complete naive numpty and still a flog

good lord
pluggsy doesnt see it or hear it so it cant have ever never happened
lol
enjoy the day baiting and floggin
im off for a cuppa tea


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296048Post plugger66 »

matrix wrote:wtf are you on about??

the stuff steviesaint and gringo are talking about f****** happens pluggsy
its seen and happens and its seen by quite a few people

and your answer is
how come no one has taken a photo with a camera phone seeing as they are everywheres nowdays


LMFAO!!
either you are
1. baiting and just being a simple flog
2.a complete naive numpty and still a flog

good lord
pluggsy doesnt see it or hear it so it cant have ever never happened
lol
enjoy the day baiting and floggin
im off for a cuppa tea

You really are a simpleton and worst of all one that doesnt cant read. I didnt say they dont take drugs. Common sense would suggest if it is that obvious to everyone at a nightclub that football players were on drugs because of the way they look wouldnt common sense all suggest in this day of an I phone that there would photos or videos taken and sent to the media for them to publish. Maybe common sense just goes over your head.
Last edited by plugger66 on Wed 06 Feb 2013 12:21pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19161
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296049Post SaintPav »

"I want a third pill".


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296078Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
matrix wrote:wtf are you on about??

the stuff steviesaint and gringo are talking about f****** happens pluggsy
its seen and happens and its seen by quite a few people

and your answer is
how come no one has taken a photo with a camera phone seeing as they are everywheres nowdays


LMFAO!!
either you are
1. baiting and just being a simple flog
2.a complete naive numpty and still a flog

good lord
pluggsy doesnt see it or hear it so it cant have ever never happened
lol
enjoy the day baiting and floggin
im off for a cuppa tea

You really are a simpleton and worst of all one that doesnt cant read. I didnt say they dont take drugs. Common sense would suggest if it is that obvious to everyone at a nightclub that football players were on drugs because of the way they look wouldnt common sense all suggest in this day of an I phone that there would photos or videos taken and sent to the media for them to publish. Maybe common sense just goes over your head.

I don't think you saw Dane Swan's Lovett pics then. He looked as pinned as a notice board. maybe they do get taken just not many journo's want to risk getting sued for calling them a drug user


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296094Post Old Mate »

We've got quite a few party goers ourselves on the list. Very high profile players. All clubs would be the same given the age demographic.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296107Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
matrix wrote:wtf are you on about??

the stuff steviesaint and gringo are talking about f****** happens pluggsy
its seen and happens and its seen by quite a few people

and your answer is
how come no one has taken a photo with a camera phone seeing as they are everywheres nowdays


LMFAO!!
either you are
1. baiting and just being a simple flog
2.a complete naive numpty and still a flog

good lord
pluggsy doesnt see it or hear it so it cant have ever never happened
lol
enjoy the day baiting and floggin
im off for a cuppa tea

You really are a simpleton and worst of all one that doesnt cant read. I didnt say they dont take drugs. Common sense would suggest if it is that obvious to everyone at a nightclub that football players were on drugs because of the way they look wouldnt common sense all suggest in this day of an I phone that there would photos or videos taken and sent to the media for them to publish. Maybe common sense just goes over your head.

I don't think you saw Dane Swan's Lovett pics then. He looked as pinned as a notice board. maybe they do get taken just not many journo's want to risk getting sued for calling them a drug user

But it is obvious so it must be true. Cant be sued for the truth. We even someone on here saying Kosi and MG were on the stuff at Lennys wedding. It is all rumour and bulls***. How can people say anything like that unless the witnessed it with their own eyes.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296133Post matrix »

well we said it huh
there was something lurking around story wise a while ago and plenty of talk behind the scenes

eddie even said something on the side not long ago didnt he

its not just coincidence that the pies players came out a couple of weeks ago and admitted talking a few cookies imo

hate eddie as we might, the guy isnt a moron


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296139Post plugger66 »

matrix wrote:well we said it huh
there was something lurking around story wise a while ago and plenty of talk behind the scenes

eddie even said something on the side not long ago didnt he

its not just coincidence that the pies players came out a couple of weeks ago and admitted talking a few cookies imo

hate eddie as we might, the guy isnt a moron

I dont get what you are saying. Are you saying people knew that Kosi nad MG were on the gear at Lennys wedding because that is what i am talking about. Winners only said it on another thread. I just want to know how people know this bulls*** unless they actually saw it with their own eyes.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296159Post matrix »

im not talking about us pluggsy
i have no idea what you are talking about re koi

im talking about hte 'story' that was floating around a few months ago about what has now come out in the open
it was well a well known 'secret' apparently

it was alluded to on here
that something was going on and there was a story that could potentially break that will rock the afl

this is the story we are now all talking about


have no idea about koz and mg


but ill say this
if st kilda did somethign like this i would never be a member again
if it was players doing it off their own backs, then dif story


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296178Post plugger66 »

matrix wrote:im not talking about us pluggsy
i have no idea what you are talking about re koi

im talking about hte 'story' that was floating around a few months ago about what has now come out in the open
it was well a well known 'secret' apparently

it was alluded to on here
that something was going on and there was a story that could potentially break that will rock the afl

this is the story we are now all talking about


have no idea about koz and mg


but ill say this
if st kilda did somethign like this i would never be a member again
if it was players doing it off their own backs, then dif story

I think you may be confused Winners only said Kosi and MG were on the gear at Lennys wedding. Illicit drugs, not performance enhancing. I just reckon people who say that without proof apart from hearsay are talking s*** and shouldnt say it on any site let alone this one.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296180Post matrix »

im not confused at all
im not talking about lennys wedding
i have no idea about that rumor

im too wrapped up in efc at the mo


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296257Post satchmo »

----------------------------------------------------------------------------->

What complete moron would allow a picture of themselves to be taken when they were wacked to the eyeballs in a nightclub?

Doesn't make sense.

:shock:


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296287Post loris »

satchmo wrote:----------------------------------------------------------------------------->

What complete moron would allow a picture of themselves to be taken when they were wacked to the eyeballs in a nightclub?

Doesn't make sense.

:shock:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Just luv that avatar, satchmo :wink:


happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1835
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 350 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296304Post happy feet »

Be careful with comments about being caught on camera!


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11242
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296332Post Bernard Shakey »

plugger66 wrote: Cant be sued for the truth.
Wanna bet?


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296333Post plugger66 »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Cant be sued for the truth.
Wanna bet?

Well you cant if you can prove its the truth.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1296337Post bergholt »

plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Cant be sued for the truth.
Wanna bet?
Well you cant if you can prove its the truth.
You can get sued for anything. Doesn't mean you'll lose, but if the other side has enough money - like an AFL player, perhaps - they can make it pretty hard for you to keep fighting. Great system!


Post Reply