dragit wrote:Isn't Roger Spandit a mate of your too plugs?
Took me a while. Had to say it quickly 10 times.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
dragit wrote:Isn't Roger Spandit a mate of your too plugs?
True Believer wrote:Thanks, Wonder...stevie wrote:Nice post, 'Daydream'.True Believer wrote:I know someone with the christian name Spencer. Hates the Frank and the Tracey thing, heavily overdone. Also the older brigade give him "Spencer the Garbage man" who apparently was a character in an old radio show. The price for an unusual name I guess, especially one that people are more used to seeing as a surname.
Well of course you didn't.stevie wrote:True Believer wrote:Thanks, Wonder...stevie wrote: Nice post, 'Daydream'.
Didn't see that coming...
plugger66 wrote:dragit wrote:Isn't Roger Spandit a mate of your too plugs?
Took me a while. Had to say it quickly 10 times.
whiskers3614 wrote:plugger66 wrote:dragit wrote:Isn't Roger Spandit a mate of your too plugs?
Took me a while. Had to say it quickly 10 times.
So you are Greek then?
St Igmata wrote:Grundy and White are different footballers and they had 3 picks to take White.
I am not following your dots.
plugger66 wrote:True Believer wrote:I know someone with the christian name Spencer. Hates the Frank and the Tracey thing, heavily overdone. Also the older brigade give him "Spencer the Garbage man" who apparently was a character in an old radio show. The price for an unusual name I guess, especially one that people are more used to seeing as a surname.
I have mates who names are Richard and Ray. There surname is Sole.
gringo wrote:plugger66 wrote:True Believer wrote:I know someone with the christian name Spencer. Hates the Frank and the Tracey thing, heavily overdone. Also the older brigade give him "Spencer the Garbage man" who apparently was a character in an old radio show. The price for an unusual name I guess, especially one that people are more used to seeing as a surname.
I have mates who names are Richard and Ray. There surname is Sole.
That's pretty funny but when your around it must get confusing who people are addressing. Only joking plugs.
Nothing like Buddy.SMS wrote:watch his video tell me you dont see buddy!
like buddy was cloned.
Good point good Doctor.Dr Spaceman wrote:A little bit off topic perhaps, however I find it annoying the use of the word “steal” in regards to the draft, eg:
“Collingwood are smiling after stealing man mountain Brodie Grundy at pick No.18”
“Ogilivie (Adelaide recruiting manager Hamish Ogilvie), who pulled off his own steal in selecting Calder Cannons' best and fairest Rory Atkins at No. 81,
Players such as Grundy and Atkins were simply available at the time Collingwood and Adelaide had their picks; if they hadn’t been they wouldn’t have got them. And it’s not through anything that Collingwood or Adelaide did that resulted in those outcomes.
"Collingwood and Adelaide may have got a bit lucky" about sums it up. And whether or not they were lucky I suppose will depend on how Grundy & Atkins go at AFL level.
Do they each drive one of these...? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI6mgPzz7f0plugger66 wrote:I have mates who names are Richard and Ray. There surname is Sole.True Believer wrote:I know someone with the christian name Spencer. Hates the Frank and the Tracey thing, heavily overdone. Also the older brigade give him "Spencer the Garbage man" who apparently was a character in an old radio show. The price for an unusual name I guess, especially one that people are more used to seeing as a surname.
White Winmar wrote:Spencer White is well worth the gamble, IMHO. Could turn out to be the next buddy, or alternately, the next Mitch Thorpe, but the boy has loads of talent and is very athletic. He definitely has the X factor and has plenty of improvement left in him. With our academy set up and strong emphasis on development, we are well placed to get the best from him.
Remember, he had a very interrupted start to the season and he didn't get his health problems fully sorted out until relatively late in the year. His testing in the athletic categories was outstanding. After the ban on flair during the Lyon years, it's exciting to see the likes of Saad, Milera, White, Saunders, Markworth and Lee on the list. Fun times ahead!
Agree with you Ace on your assessment of Buddy and Richos' kicking.ace wrote:Nothing like Buddy.SMS wrote:watch his video tell me you dont see buddy!
like buddy was cloned.
This guy White can kick straight.
Buddy comes from the Matthew Richardson kicking school, close your eyes and hope for the best.
We got a lot closer in 2004 that many people think.gringo wrote:White Winmar wrote:Spencer White is well worth the gamble, IMHO. Could turn out to be the next buddy, or alternately, the next Mitch Thorpe, but the boy has loads of talent and is very athletic. He definitely has the X factor and has plenty of improvement left in him. With our academy set up and strong emphasis on development, we are well placed to get the best from him.
Remember, he had a very interrupted start to the season and he didn't get his health problems fully sorted out until relatively late in the year. His testing in the athletic categories was outstanding. After the ban on flair during the Lyon years, it's exciting to see the likes of Saad, Milera, White, Saunders, Markworth and Lee on the list. Fun times ahead!
I loved winning games but the style of play was getting excruciating when we started losing games. Ross' style was great at pinching wins when we applied it well but when we dropped away the game plan looked as exciting as tortoises mating. The new players we have bought in seem to have that Collingwood model of confident ball winners rather than second hand dour foot soldiers.
Most of our new recruits seem to have some x factor about them and if we aren't going to challenge at least we might be exciting to watch. I watched a replay when Thommo was coaching recently and gee we had some fire power. I loved that era of attacking footy, didn't get us anywhere but it was exciting.
Only because Brissy had to play a home prelim at the G.SaintPav wrote:We got a lot closer in 2004 that many people think.gringo wrote:White Winmar wrote:Spencer White is well worth the gamble, IMHO. Could turn out to be the next buddy, or alternately, the next Mitch Thorpe, but the boy has loads of talent and is very athletic. He definitely has the X factor and has plenty of improvement left in him. With our academy set up and strong emphasis on development, we are well placed to get the best from him.
Remember, he had a very interrupted start to the season and he didn't get his health problems fully sorted out until relatively late in the year. His testing in the athletic categories was outstanding. After the ban on flair during the Lyon years, it's exciting to see the likes of Saad, Milera, White, Saunders, Markworth and Lee on the list. Fun times ahead!
I loved winning games but the style of play was getting excruciating when we started losing games. Ross' style was great at pinching wins when we applied it well but when we dropped away the game plan looked as exciting as tortoises mating. The new players we have bought in seem to have that Collingwood model of confident ball winners rather than second hand dour foot soldiers.
Most of our new recruits seem to have some x factor about them and if we aren't going to challenge at least we might be exciting to watch. I watched a replay when Thommo was coaching recently and gee we had some fire power. I loved that era of attacking footy, didn't get us anywhere but it was exciting.
Yes and we would have gone in as massive underdogs which would have worked in our favour.Beekay wrote: Only because Brissy had to play a home prelim at the G.