Hickey
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7941
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 550 times
- Been thanked: 255 times
Re: Hickey
I can't wait for next friday afternoon...All this trade speculation will be done and then we can just deal with the facts.....We paid overs....
How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ?
Re: Hickey
After saying they wanted two first rounders for Caddy then just took the Geelong compp pick... there's no way that they'll end up with pick 13. Maybe 24? They kind of shot themselves in the foot by showing everyone that they really aren't going to follow through with their claims of what they demand for their players...
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Hickey
We have Stanley and McEvoy... two young ruckmen and a few pinchhitters.
I'd rather we concentrate on midfileders/clearance players or half forward flankers/goalkickers.
I hope we don't waste 25 on a ruckman !
I'd even use pick 37 on a good/clever half forward flanker/goalkicking prospect (if there's one still out there at that stage)... ahead of Hickey.
I'd rather we concentrate on midfileders/clearance players or half forward flankers/goalkickers.
I hope we don't waste 25 on a ruckman !
I'd even use pick 37 on a good/clever half forward flanker/goalkicking prospect (if there's one still out there at that stage)... ahead of Hickey.
Last edited by samoht on Sat 20 Oct 2012 12:40pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 1:27pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Hickey
we have heaps of developing half forwards on our list though? With Markworth, Dunell, Siposs, milera and shenton on the list surely thats the last spot (along with hb flankers) we need to fill
oh when the saints
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Hickey
If one of them comes through for us and develops into a reliable goal kicker - that would be nice.class of 2010 wrote:we have heaps of developing half forwards on our list though? With Markworth, Dunell, Siposs, milera and shenton on the list surely thats the last spot (along with hb flankers) we need to fill
Two good half forward flankers would be better.
I'm taking a machine gun approach to it - just in case and besides a few like Siposs, Milera may end up in the midfield and wing or half back flank ?
We definitely have enough ruck stocks and after looking at WCE tap outs to clearance ratio - I'm not that concerned with the ruckmen as far as hitoouts go.
Can Hickey get 20 possessions regularly around the ground?- that's much more important.
Last edited by samoht on Sat 20 Oct 2012 1:03pm, edited 2 times in total.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 4:14pm
- Location: Near the You Yangs, or as my wife used to call it, the Dugongs.
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Hickey
Thanks fotr the update. Should give us considerable room for negotiation you would think.ace wrote:West Coast's draft picks just became 41, 61, 62, 81, 99, 117, 135
St Kilda has picks 13, 25, 37, 46, 57 , 77, 95, 113, 131
That's after the free agent compensation picks are added in.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Hickey
They are pretty much done.samoht wrote:There's also Blake, Kosi ?
If Hickey comes cheap - I have no problem with that.
We have Macca and Stanley. We NEED another ruckman. End of story!
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Hickey
Hickey is a must just reading a tweet from Emma Quayle saying that hickey if available in this draft would almost be the fist big man drafted, ahead of Grundy.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Hickey
seriously did you see kosi ruck in the last few years, gravity has defeated himsamoht wrote:There's also Blake, Kosi ?
If Hickey comes cheap - I have no problem with that.
blake at best was as surprise attack a few years ago, would not want him pinch hitting at this stage in his career
stanley will be groomed as the Roo replacement so dont want him ruined in the ruck, he is a runner not a battering ram
Mcevoy is fine, he just needs help
I called that pick 13 was going to come into play a few posts back, the problem is, and this is often the case with the saints, it is a sellers market.
and yes I would have taken macintosh at 36, lock stock and lars
Seeya
*************
*************
Re: Hickey
Yep, need a second ruck. Its just a matter of how good a ruck you get since we probably won't play two specialists.
Re: Hickey
Wha? Grundy is expected to be taken in the top 5... gee thanks Emma what a way to do a club a favour...kos wrote:Hickey is a must just reading a tweet from Emma Quayle saying that hickey if available in this draft would almost be the fist big man drafted, ahead of Grundy.
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 12:43pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Hickey
Pick 13, No, Pick 24 maybe. This kid better be bloody good if we're going to give up a second rounder in a strong draft.
Also, what's the latest with Cripps? Now that Stevens has nominated the Dogs, the Eagles don't have much in the way of picks to give us. Maybe, just maybe, the Saints are quietly happy that Stevens nominated the Dogs...now Brown is the only currency they have if they want to secure Cripps. Otherwise they have to wait for the draft, and hope like buggery no one else selects him. Let the games begin!
Also, what's the latest with Cripps? Now that Stevens has nominated the Dogs, the Eagles don't have much in the way of picks to give us. Maybe, just maybe, the Saints are quietly happy that Stevens nominated the Dogs...now Brown is the only currency they have if they want to secure Cripps. Otherwise they have to wait for the draft, and hope like buggery no one else selects him. Let the games begin!
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5942
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 803 times
Re: Hickey
Bold statement. Especially since the ruck is our achilles heel.Saintersss wrote:So people want to give Pick 25 for a player who won't be in our best 22?
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 104 times
Re: Hickey
25 for Hickey? Yes.. young Ruck who could be a star.. more chance of being good than an 18 year.. pick 25 on youngsters is always a bit of a lottery
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 289 times
- Been thanked: 281 times
Re: Hickey
I can see it evolving into a 3-way deal with Hawthorn. We give Hawthorn pick 25 & 37, they give Gilham and 28 to GC, GC give us Hickey and 26.SuperDuper wrote:25 for Hickey? Yes.. young Ruck who could be a star.. more chance of being good than an 18 year.. pick 25 on youngsters is always a bit of a lottery
The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
Re: Hickey
I would be delighted with that deal.True Believer wrote:I can see it evolving into a 3-way deal with Hawthorn. We give Hawthorn pick 25 & 37, they give Gilham and 28 to GC, GC give us Hickey and 26.SuperDuper wrote:25 for Hickey? Yes.. young Ruck who could be a star.. more chance of being good than an 18 year.. pick 25 on youngsters is always a bit of a lottery
FQF
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 4:14pm
- Location: Near the You Yangs, or as my wife used to call it, the Dugongs.
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Hickey
That's generous of youTrue Believer wrote:I can see it evolving into a 3-way deal with Hawthorn. We give Hawthorn pick 25 & 37, they give Gilham and 28 to GC, GC give us Hickey and 26.SuperDuper wrote:25 for Hickey? Yes.. young Ruck who could be a star.. more chance of being good than an 18 year.. pick 25 on youngsters is always a bit of a lottery
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Hickey
i would take that.The Jeff wrote:I would be delighted with that deal.True Believer wrote:I can see it evolving into a 3-way deal with Hawthorn. We give Hawthorn pick 25 & 37, they give Gilham and 28 to GC, GC give us Hickey and 26.SuperDuper wrote:25 for Hickey? Yes.. young Ruck who could be a star.. more chance of being good than an 18 year.. pick 25 on youngsters is always a bit of a lottery
we get a young ruckman plus can still use 13 and 26 on kids.
Re: Hickey
Of course we would take it, we're getting Hickey for pick 37!
However, why would GC trade Hickey for Gilham? Let alone lower their draft pick as well?
I'm certain the Saints and Hawks would be dead keen, but GC are getting screwed. Gilham is worth almost nothing.
However, why would GC trade Hickey for Gilham? Let alone lower their draft pick as well?
I'm certain the Saints and Hawks would be dead keen, but GC are getting screwed. Gilham is worth almost nothing.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
- Location: brisy
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Hickey
I too thought of MacIntosh for 36,not bad, Gardner & King worked well for us,in the past, but the fact is here we are again needing ruck stocks
I think we need to recruit another long term prospect and play them,and develop them,ahead of playing older types.The older types become back up.
I think we need to recruit another long term prospect and play them,and develop them,ahead of playing older types.The older types become back up.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Hickey
It's true that Nat jumps higher than the opposition ruckmen (the opposite of our gravity defeated Kosi) and wins many more hitouts - yet the other part that's true is that most of his hitouts go to 50/50's or to the opposition. - so it doesn't give his team any advantage.sunsaint wrote:seriously did you see kosi ruck in the last few years, gravity has defeated himsamoht wrote:There's also Blake, Kosi ?
If Hickey comes cheap - I have no problem with that.
Again I repeat - WCE has 15 more hitouts than average per game - but this still results in an average amount of clearances. Their "superior" tap ruckmen with their extra 15 hitouts per game don't make a difference.
If Hickey has the potential to develop into a 20 possession a game player (to become as good as Cox around the ground) and comes cheap - that's fine.
The clearance players get the clearances - so that's why I'd be recruiting a good clearance player ahead of a tap ruckman (especially one that does little around the ground) every day of the week
Last edited by samoht on Sun 21 Oct 2012 5:33pm, edited 3 times in total.