I think ILuvHarvey is on the money. They get access to players through zones, NT players, pre-listed etc. All kinds of strange concessions.plugger66 wrote:Is that the reason? Why did we get Saad and Milera then?Old Mate wrote: Cos he was previously listed with an AFL club (Crows). GWS have the rights to up to 10 pre-listed AFL players.
Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Seems like it... We gave picks to GWS for Saad and Milera now Lee.MCG-Unit wrote:Looks like it's open slather for GWS pre-listing players then - seems like they have the rights to anyone not AFL listed !!plugger66 wrote:Old Mate wrote:
Cos Lee was previously listed with an AFL club (Crows). GWS have the rights to up to 10 pre-listed AFL players.
Is that the reason? Why did we get Saad and Milera then?
Bottomless pit, much like their (and GC) 'salary cap'
It seems like the AFL default is - if ur not connected with a club than you are GWS property.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Exactly.SaintSimmo wrote:The recruiters know what their doing....i'll leave it at that
And as Burt Bacharach would say:
"We've only just begun..."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7394
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
for....sakeSaintPav wrote:Yeah, but pick 12? Maybe our second round draft pick and also involving a swap of picks, maybe..70s sainter wrote:Hopefully he's our Tom Hawkins . He was close to being shown the door in 2011 and look how he turned out b& f in 2012. Some of these big forwards take a while to match it with the big boys but when they turn the corner - look out.
He was not for pick 12 only
24 and 43 came with him
saint4life
- HitTheBoundary
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Fri 27 Feb 2009 9:00am
- Location: Walkabout
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
- Contact:
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
24 for Hickey 90% likely only thing holding up that trade is the possibility of getting Caddy as part of the deal. Pick 13 & 24 for Caddy and Hickey still a strong possibility. Saints happy to part ways with draft picks to securing good 21 year old players.St Ick wrote:Not sure I am convinced trading 12 was smart. But if we did something like this...
24 for Jacobs or...
24 & Cripps for Stevens and Brown...then
43 for Hickey... it starts sounding great. So pick 12 & Ray for Hickey, Brown, Lee and Stevens is a lot better than pick 12 for Caddy.
Dunno, just trying to see the positive side of this trade as I'm still in a bit of shock to be honest (considering he was pick 60 & delisted & not picked up last year)...
- Hurricane
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
- Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
I hope he doesnt turn out to be two facedHitTheBoundary wrote:
Tommy Lee - our new sharpshooter.
BANG BANG
Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Looking at that video he doesn't look anywhere near as tall as 194cm.
I hope he's a good'un.
I hope he's a good'un.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
OK so this could part one in a two part deal, like Saad and Milera...
No way of it backfiring is there?
No way of it backfiring is there?
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Jacks Back wrote:Looking at that video he doesn't look anywhere near as tall as 194cm.
I hope he's a good'un.
He plays short.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Was that a two-part deal?SainterK wrote:OK so this could part one in a two part deal, like Saad and Milera...
No way of it backfiring is there?
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Perhaps because he is so good at ground level also - looks very similiar to GWS Jeremy Cameron to me, hopefully he does just as well !Jacks Back wrote:Looking at that video he doesn't look anywhere near as tall as 194cm.
I hope he's a good'un.
I think the Saints have found there next generation CHF - looks impressive I can understand why they were so keen to get him before the draft.
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7394
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Why are so many saying Lee too expensive ........cost pick 12 .................
Lee ..PLUS PICK 24 PLUS 43 for 12
watered down pick 12 maybe
the use of the extra picks impotant in the whole outcome though!
Lee ..PLUS PICK 24 PLUS 43 for 12
watered down pick 12 maybe
the use of the extra picks impotant in the whole outcome though!
saint4life
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
I think 24 for Hickey or 13 & 24 for Caddy and Hickey is paying overs to be honest. If 13 & 24 were used I would want more Suns players like Toy or Mav, either way I think I am still in shock...Old Mate wrote:24 for Hickey 90% likely only thing holding up that trade is the possibility of getting Caddy as part of the deal. Pick 13 & 24 for Caddy and Hickey still a strong possibility. Saints happy to part ways with draft picks to securing good 21 year old players.St Ick wrote:Not sure I am convinced trading 12 was smart. But if we did something like this...
24 for Jacobs or...
24 & Cripps for Stevens and Brown...then
43 for Hickey... it starts sounding great. So pick 12 & Ray for Hickey, Brown, Lee and Stevens is a lot better than pick 12 for Caddy.
Dunno, just trying to see the positive side of this trade as I'm still in a bit of shock to be honest (considering he was pick 60 & delisted & not picked up last year)...
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1319
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
We need to see what happens to pick 24, before we are uup in arms about trading pick 12 for lee...
Because it is really pick 12 for Lee + Brown, or Lee + Jacobs or Lee + Hickey
+ whoever we get for 43
then, we can assess (although it may take 5 years to assess!!)
Because it is really pick 12 for Lee + Brown, or Lee + Jacobs or Lee + Hickey
+ whoever we get for 43
then, we can assess (although it may take 5 years to assess!!)
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Watch his highlight VIDEO people before bagging our recuitment team. He will be an excellent pick up and chances he would have been drfated well before Selection 12 at the draft. Lets not kid ourselves the AFL clubs are finally onto the benefit of drafting quality state league players over kids. PLUS we have the other two selections to work into the Brown and Hickey deals.
Well done SAINTERS !
Well done SAINTERS !
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
WinnersOnly wrote:Watch his highlight VIDEO people before bagging our recuitment team. He will be an excellent pick up and chances he would have been drfated well before Selection 12 at the draft. Lets not kid ourselves the AFL clubs are finally onto the benefit of drafting quality state league players over kids. PLUS we have the other two selections to work into the Brown and Hickey deals.
Well done SAINTERS !
I am certainly not bagging the recruiters as i know nothing of him. What I do know is highlights videos are a bit of a waste of time after all it is a highlights video. I also know one phantom draft had him 30 to rookie so so I doubt he was going before pick 12. We lost 12 picks in the draft. We will probably never know if we are in front or behind unless he is a star or a hack.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Dont worry about it Chook - either there are more trolls on here than I thought or some just dont have the brain capacity to read a full sentence.chook23 wrote:Why are so many saying Lee too expensive ........cost pick 12 .................
Lee ..PLUS PICK 24 PLUS 43 for 12
watered down pick 12 maybe
the use of the extra picks impotant in the whole outcome though!
As I see it we have lost Goddard (an aging past his peak 27 year old - turns 28 in the middle of next season) for Tom Lee (a fast improving 21 year old KPP) + first pick in the 2nd round draft + first pick in the 3rd round draft + salary cap space/relief
So as it stands we have lost Goddard but we have Tom Lee + picks 13 (TBC), 24, 34 (both 2nd round), 43, 53 (both 3rd round), 71, 89, 107, 125 + salary cap relief/space
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
So Highlight vids are a waste of time but someone's phantom draft should be relied upon??plugger66 wrote:WinnersOnly wrote:Watch his highlight VIDEO people before bagging our recuitment team. He will be an excellent pick up and chances he would have been drfated well before Selection 12 at the draft. Lets not kid ourselves the AFL clubs are finally onto the benefit of drafting quality state league players over kids. PLUS we have the other two selections to work into the Brown and Hickey deals.
Well done SAINTERS !
I am certainly not bagging the recruiters as i know nothing of him. What I do know is highlights videos are a bit of a waste of time after all it is a highlights video. I also know one phantom draft had him 30 to rookie so so I doubt he was going before pick 12. We lost 12 picks in the draft. We will probably never know if we are in front or behind unless he is a star or a hack.
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Tom Lee - some nobody from WA.
Will be this decades Barry Brooks - paid a fortune over the odds for someone that could have been picked up for a 3rd rounder.
Shocking trade.
But hey he is from WA so Watters would think the sun shines our of his arse.
Will be this decades Barry Brooks - paid a fortune over the odds for someone that could have been picked up for a 3rd rounder.
Shocking trade.
But hey he is from WA so Watters would think the sun shines our of his arse.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
plugger66 wrote:Jacks Back wrote:Looking at that video he doesn't look anywhere near as tall as 194cm.
I hope he's a good'un.
He plays short.
How many times have you seen him play a full game? None I bet. Wanker alert!
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
Brendan I hope you enjoy watching Tom tear your Bombers apart next year !
I believe players who leave chasing money rarely end up playing as long as they would have at there oroiginal club. As it works out their greed works against them extending there careers and in the end making less $$$ out the game than if they had remained.
Bye & thanks Brendan !
I believe players who leave chasing money rarely end up playing as long as they would have at there oroiginal club. As it works out their greed works against them extending there careers and in the end making less $$$ out the game than if they had remained.
Bye & thanks Brendan !
Last edited by WinnersOnly on Mon 08 Oct 2012 6:39pm, edited 1 time in total.
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
Re: Tom Lee Traded for our pick 12
joffaboy wrote:Tom Lee - some nobody from WA.
Will be this decades Barry Brooks - paid a fortune over the odds for someone that could have been picked up for a 3rd rounder.
Shocking trade.
But hey he is from WA so Watters would think the sun shines our of his arse.
Bit rich from you?