Zac Clarke!!!!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269488Post gringo »

bergholt wrote:
gringo wrote:I would give a second round pick for zac Clarke, people have got a bit excited because he had his best game against us. Didn't help we had no one against him that night. He has potential but I think some people are seeing his value on one game. he would be good in the Leigh Brown role but isn't a great forward or pure ruck yet.
He's shown a bit more than Rhys Stanley has and he's only about nine months older, so I don't see why we wouldn't be willing to give him a go at the right price. If Cripps is unsettled then I'd see that as being a reasonable swap.

how many games have you seen him play? I would say fairly similar type to Stanley but seems to run around looking a bit lost. Both have a lot of potential but neither are breaking games open. He is still a risk in that he could be a Dawes Leigh brown type rather than tippett. so would rather use a later pick on him than swap Cripps. i would prefer to take Kobe Stevens with the swap and possibly unload Faz or someone who's on the fringe currently and a WA boy.


User avatar
St Loxton
Club Player
Posts: 1232
Joined: Mon 02 Feb 2009 9:50pm
Location: Jindivick
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269489Post St Loxton »

Thinline wrote:Cripps for Clarke in an absolute heartbeat.

+ 1 For sure, best still way ahead of him.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269498Post bergholt »

gringo wrote:how many games have you seen him play? I would say fairly similar type to Stanley but seems to run around looking a bit lost. Both have a lot of potential but neither are breaking games open.
Fair question, f***-all to be honest. But as you say, a fairly similar type to Stanley and neither are breaking games open - if we're willing to hang onto Stanley then I don't see why we wouldn't be willing to pick up Clarke.
gringo wrote:He is still a risk in that he could be a Dawes Leigh brown type rather than tippett. so would rather use a later pick on him than swap Cripps.
Yeah, sure, if that's possible. But I imagine there'll be a little bit of competition for a raw big man with a couple of years development under his belt, so I'm not sure why Freo would take a fourth round pick or something.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269502Post gringo »

bergholt wrote:
gringo wrote:how many games have you seen him play? I would say fairly similar type to Stanley but seems to run around looking a bit lost. Both have a lot of potential but neither are breaking games open.
Fair question, f***-all to be honest. But as you say, a fairly similar type to Stanley and neither are breaking games open - if we're willing to hang onto Stanley then I don't see why we wouldn't be willing to pick up Clarke.
gringo wrote:He is still a risk in that he could be a Dawes Leigh brown type rather than tippett. so would rather use a later pick on him than swap Cripps.
Yeah, sure, if that's possible. But I imagine there'll be a little bit of competition for a raw big man with a couple of years development under his belt, so I'm not sure why Freo would take a fourth round pick or something.

just saying cripps was a first rounder and looks to be a lot closer to being an elite player. second rounder and a fringe player would be better for Zac. Stanley doesn't need to be drafted so we can develop him at our leisure with out costing anything. i would personally be looking at Hickey first as he looks a proper centre square ruckman with some athleticism. Zac Clarke may end up a gun but he might just as easily be a spud. Freo aren't exactly begging him to stay.


User avatar
sax
Club Player
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue 29 Nov 2005 10:19pm
Location: Barossa Valley
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269518Post sax »

If we play it right, Ross might give us Zac for nothing like he did with Luke Ball to Collingwood!


Foundation Social Club Member No. 296
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269521Post gringo »

sax wrote:If we play it right, Ross might give us Zac for nothing like he did with Luke Ball to Collingwood!

don't laugh, he is actually pretty unemotional once he has decided to move them on. Xavier and Goose were pretty much sent on their way as were most of his rejects. He doesn't see players as anything but an expendable necessity in his chess game. once they go he doesn't sem to take any further interest.


Thinline
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6043
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269525Post Thinline »

Being brutally honest I don't really see anything much in Cripps, I've got to say. Seems to get hurt a lot. Seems to be one for whom the magic water sponge comes out of the bucket for a lot, too. And homesick? Bah! Go cuddle up with your comforter in Cottesloe, Crippsy. Just give me Clarke as you go. *


*Partial sarcasm alert.


"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269528Post matrix »

LOL
clarke for cripps

yeah
thats going to happen

and there still has been nothing official anywhere about clarke wanting a trade back to melb
only freo coming out and saying he is a required player

which means F*** all tho
gee youd have him in your side
but i think freo wont want to get rid of him that quickly and would play hard ball


saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269596Post saint6709 »

Zac Clarke - future saint cult hero in the making - get hi,


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269599Post stinger »

saint6709 wrote:Zac Clarke - future saint cult hero in the making - get hi,

i've had a gut feeling all year about this guy....could always picture him in a saints jumper too...... :wink:


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269600Post prwilkinson »

Would love to get Giles but doubtful on that one.... straight swap for crippsy... yeah why not.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269607Post gringo »

prwilkinson wrote:Would love to get Giles but doubtful on that one.... straight swap for crippsy... yeah why not.

Giles is more what we need in my opinion. He's a genuine tap ruckman. None of this jumping around stuff or good around the ground for a big man crap.


User avatar
prwilkinson
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1999
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269620Post prwilkinson »

gringo wrote:
prwilkinson wrote:Would love to get Giles but doubtful on that one.... straight swap for crippsy... yeah why not.

Giles is more what we need in my opinion. He's a genuine tap ruckman. None of this jumping around stuff or good around the ground for a big man crap.
Yeah... Would love to get first use of the footy.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269630Post dragit »

Clarke a massive mobile skillfull fwd/ruck is worth a lot more than a small speedy back flanker with health issues.


User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269647Post ShanghaiSaint »

sax wrote:Got this from Football Nation

UPDATE: 4/10/12 - FREMANTLE ruckman Zac Clarke wants to be traded to a Victorian club and has told the Dockers he wishes to do so. Clarke is one of many ruckman up for grabs including North’s Hamish McIntosh, who has told the Roos he wants to be traded to Geelong.


Trade Cripps to Freo NOW (or when trade period starts)!!

Here's the link.
http://www.footballnation.com.au/afl/af ... rade-week/
Think it would be a great pick up, we're ruck light and Ben needs some back up. 09 we had a great ruck duo Gardi and King, i feel we have been missing that strength for a while now.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269855Post Rosco »

pretty sure they'd want more than Cripps


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269859Post defacto »

its one of hickey or clarke. not both.

do not want clarke. he isnt a footballer. can not read the play. has had patches of good form but few and far between.


User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269869Post ShanghaiSaint »

Rosco wrote:pretty sure they'd want more than Cripps
Hey Rosco, we're in the same sub.... i'm on poath rd!


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269885Post Rosco »

ShanghaiSaint wrote:
Rosco wrote:pretty sure they'd want more than Cripps
Hey Rosco, we're in the same sub.... i'm on poath rd!
north or south of the roundabout? it's important.


St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1269887Post St Ick »

defacto wrote:its one of hickey or clarke. not both.

do not want clarke. he isnt a footballer. can not read the play. has had patches of good form but few and far between.
He was disgusting dropping marks and giving away frees in that final vs the Crows and his inclusion over Bradley was one of the reasons Freo lost.

Hickey would be cheaper and better than Clarke. A big no way plus I aint interested in dealing with Ross and giving him a potential gun.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5862
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1270035Post Dave McNamara »

defacto wrote:its one of hickey or clarke. not both.

do not want clarke. he isnt a footballer. can not read the play. has had patches of good form but few and far between.
Agreed.

From my limited observations from afar...

Clarke comes across as mentally soft (which is why Ro$$y seems not to rate him?), and as not being a natural footballer. Probably still wouldn't come cheaply though...? Also, although Zac may just need more hugs, one has to wonder about any player who struggles to get a game ahead of Keppler Bradley(!!!) :shock: :shock: :shock:

That said, with the recent or imminent deminished roles in/departures from our side of Mini, Raph, Zac D, D'arch, Peakey, CJ and Kosi, then factor in the improvement in Gears, Armo and Seany D... it's really starting to open a bit of hole in our list for players for us fans to bag. Grammy and Wilksey can't shoulder this load alone, they will need help! The Pelican is aware of this looming problem for us fans, and will no doubt want to move to address it.

Zac Clarke would be a perfect replacement..., and his name might well fool some into thinking that we had actually acquired two 'replacements'. :idea:

Hickey: Even more limited observations than Clarke... but I really like what I have seen/read. Seems very impressive already. Can ruck well, and is mobile and kicks goals up forward. Isn't that what's needed from a big bloke in this brave new footy world? :idea: Then, when one considers that he's still a youth playing against men... with increased size, fitness, experience and hence confidence... huge potential upside for mine.

And if we could get Hickey for a second rounder pick... bargain IMHO... go for it Pelican. :D


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1270040Post stinger »

Rosco wrote:pretty sure they'd want more than Cripps

why....cripps was a first round draft pick......you should get clarke for a pick in the third or fourth round.....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1270231Post plugger66 »

stinger wrote:
Rosco wrote:pretty sure they'd want more than Cripps

why....cripps was a first round draft pick......you should get clarke for a pick in the third or fourth round.....

Only if you have no idea about footy. I think that is pretty clear.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7934
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 548 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1270238Post bobmurray »

sax wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:His name has to be a worry if he came our way.

What are some people going to call him?

Spuddity Spud?

Sorry, my bad!

It did shoot straight over my head.

Please accept my apology! I was the space cadet!
you dont have to apologise...they don't own the place.....you are allowed to have a different opinion.....


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Zac Clarke!!!!

Post: # 1270263Post Dr Spaceman »

bobmurray wrote:
sax wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:His name has to be a worry if he came our way.

What are some people going to call him?

Spuddity Spud?

Sorry, my bad!

It did shoot straight over my head.

Please accept my apology! I was the space cadet!
you dont have to apologise...they don't own the place.....you are allowed to have a different opinion.....
This doesn't even make any sense :?


Post Reply