plugger66 wrote:Middo wrote:Ha you sucker Pluggs to easy you big tosser , everybody else wrong and your right !! So quick to jump on everybody else but hate it coming back you Pen!s....
No. Love it.
Ha Ha Pen!s....
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
plugger66 wrote:Middo wrote:Ha you sucker Pluggs to easy you big tosser , everybody else wrong and your right !! So quick to jump on everybody else but hate it coming back you Pen!s....
No. Love it.
Middo wrote:plugger66 wrote:Middo wrote:Ha you sucker Pluggs to easy you big tosser , everybody else wrong and your right !! So quick to jump on everybody else but hate it coming back you Pen!s....
No. Love it.
Ha Ha Pen!s....
It is not clear to me whether the team who gets the player LOSES a draft pick to the club who loses the player.... I cant see where it is spelled out.. all the informationon the web is very nebuluous about what the compensation is.... it seems the team gaining a player should lose a pick... but equally it seems silly that the worth of the player us dependent on which team he goes to.....Does anyone know whether the first round compensation pick is the buying clubs' pick (i.e., Freo pick approx # 14) or would we receive an early 1st round priority pick?
SuperDuper wrote:It is not clear to me whether the team who gets the player LOSES a draft pick to the club who loses the player.... I cant see where it is spelled out.. all the informationon the web is very nebuluous about what the compensation is.... it seems the team gaining a player should lose a pick... but equally it seems silly that the worth of the player us dependent on which team he goes to.....Does anyone know whether the first round compensation pick is the buying clubs' pick (i.e., Freo pick approx # 14) or would we receive an early 1st round priority pick?
Maybe we need to be hoping Freo lose next week if he is going there!
Can anyone find any better information about this rule?
That does not look like a guy that is leaving the club one bit, seeking out the camera full of cheer. If he was leaving he would be anguished IMO.saintbrat wrote:farren has a friend join him in interview
http://www.saints.com.au/multimedia/tab ... fault.aspx
I agree. I thought if he was leaving he would of shown sadness at the end of the game.dragit wrote:That does not look like a guy that is leaving the club one bit, seeking out the camera full of cheer. If he was leaving he would be anguished IMO.saintbrat wrote:farren has a friend join him in interview
http://www.saints.com.au/multimedia/tab ... fault.aspx
StGoddard18 wrote:I agree. I thought if he was leaving he would of shown sadness at the end of the game.dragit wrote:That does not look like a guy that is leaving the club one bit, seeking out the camera full of cheer. If he was leaving he would be anguished IMO.saintbrat wrote:farren has a friend join him in interview
http://www.saints.com.au/multimedia/tab ... fault.aspx
I dont understand the logic here really....why shouldnt they give up a pick?I dont know how the picks work but the team gaining certainly doesnt lose a pick and neither they should.
Only true if you are assuming he is thinking like we would. I wouldn't read too much into it at all tempting that it is.StGoddard18 wrote:I agree. I thought if he was leaving he would of shown sadness at the end of the game.dragit wrote:That does not look like a guy that is leaving the club one bit, seeking out the camera full of cheer. If he was leaving he would be anguished IMO.saintbrat wrote:farren has a friend join him in interview
http://www.saints.com.au/multimedia/tab ... fault.aspx
Don't clutch at straws. Remember last year.SainterK wrote:Still think he will stay, still not that enthused about the club suddenly and vocally putting it out there that he has a contract to sign when you get the feeling it's been messy and a bit rushed.
I do remember, club stuffed around a bit, but confident this time they have fortunately done so with someone who will (I hope) make allowances.SaintPav wrote:Don't clutch at straws. Remember last year.SainterK wrote:Still think he will stay, still not that enthused about the club suddenly and vocally putting it out there that he has a contract to sign when you get the feeling it's been messy and a bit rushed.
Yes !dragit wrote:That does not look like a guy that is leaving the club one bit, seeking out the camera full of cheer. If he was leaving he would be anguished IMO.saintbrat wrote:farren has a friend join him in interview
http://www.saints.com.au/multimedia/tab ... fault.aspx
The club didn't stuff around according to Nathan Burke. Contract talks were put on hold by both parties by mutual consent. Freo saw an opportunity and took it. I personally heard a board member talk about the risks of losing Ross Lyon to a club like Carlton who would come at him with a massive offer that St Kilda could not match. That was back in April/may 2011. They knew the risks.SainterK wrote:I do remember, club stuffed around a bit, but confident this time they have fortunately done so with someone who will (I hope) make allowances.SaintPav wrote:Don't clutch at straws. Remember last year.SainterK wrote:Still think he will stay, still not that enthused about the club suddenly and vocally putting it out there that he has a contract to sign when you get the feeling it's been messy and a bit rushed.
That's why it's called Free Agency, because it's free.SuperDuper wrote:I dont understand the logic here really....why shouldnt they give up a pick?I dont know how the picks work but the team gaining certainly doesnt lose a pick and neither they should.
they get something for nothing, because they offer more money.... ?
there was also a rumor doing the rounds that the father of an ex saints player acted as the go between and pretty much worked out all the contract details so that when ross decided to go, it was a flick of the switch and all done and duested within 24 hours.SaintPav wrote:The club didn't stuff around according to Nathan Burke. Contract talks were put on hold by both parties by mutual consent. Freo saw an opportunity and took it. I personally heard a board member talk about the risks of losing Ross Lyon to a club like Carlton who would come at him with a massive offer that St Kilda could not match. That was back in April/may 2011. They knew the risks.SainterK wrote:I do remember, club stuffed around a bit, but confident this time they have fortunately done so with someone who will (I hope) make allowances.SaintPav wrote:
Don't clutch at straws. Remember last year.
SaintPav wrote: The club didn't stuff around according to Nathan Burke. Contract talks were put on hold by both parties by mutual consent. Freo saw an opportunity and took it. I personally heard a board member talk about the risks of losing Ross Lyon to a club like Carlton who would come at him with a massive offer that St Kilda could not match. That was back in April/may 2011. They knew the risks.
Sorry, what's the connection to Watters?defacto wrote: there was also a rumor doing the rounds that the father of an ex saints player acted as the go between and pretty much worked out all the contract details so that when ross decided to go, it was a flick of the switch and all done and duested within 24 hours.
what makes your comment and the rumor very interesting is the connection to watters.
past club (not afl). not saying anything is up but if that rumor is true about the ex saints player, then it makes it very interesting.SaintPav wrote:SaintPav wrote: The club didn't stuff around according to Nathan Burke. Contract talks were put on hold by both parties by mutual consent. Freo saw an opportunity and took it. I personally heard a board member talk about the risks of losing Ross Lyon to a club like Carlton who would come at him with a massive offer that St Kilda could not match. That was back in April/may 2011. They knew the risks.Sorry, what's the connection to Watters?defacto wrote: there was also a rumor doing the rounds that the father of an ex saints player acted as the go between and pretty much worked out all the contract details so that when ross decided to go, it was a flick of the switch and all done and duested within 24 hours.
what makes your comment and the rumor very interesting is the connection to watters.