Blakey back.... who may go out
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Blakey back.... who may go out
St Kilda FC@stkildafc
BREAKING: Jason Blake has been cleared to play this weekend after recovering from ankle surgery http://bit.ly/O2gbGG #gosaints
http://www.saints.com.au/news/newsartic ... fault.aspx
DEFENDER Jason Blake is in line to make a football comeback this weekend with the club clearing him to play after recovering from an ankle injury.
Blake underwent surgery last month after coming off hurt in the Saints’ game against North Melbourne in Round 14.
“Jason had a syndesmosis ( what) injury to the ankle; which is the ligament between the fibula and the tibia. This needed to be repaired surgically to restore normal function,” High Performance Manager Peter Burge said.
“While it was a significant injury, Jason’s rehabilitation program has been pleasing.”
BREAKING: Jason Blake has been cleared to play this weekend after recovering from ankle surgery http://bit.ly/O2gbGG #gosaints
http://www.saints.com.au/news/newsartic ... fault.aspx
DEFENDER Jason Blake is in line to make a football comeback this weekend with the club clearing him to play after recovering from an ankle injury.
Blake underwent surgery last month after coming off hurt in the Saints’ game against North Melbourne in Round 14.
“Jason had a syndesmosis ( what) injury to the ankle; which is the ligament between the fibula and the tibia. This needed to be repaired surgically to restore normal function,” High Performance Manager Peter Burge said.
“While it was a significant injury, Jason’s rehabilitation program has been pleasing.”
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Out Kosi in Blake.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Surely won't walk back in... although it is melbourne
“Yeah….nah””
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7088
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Give him a week in the VFL while blooding a few kids against Melbourne. If he makes a successful return then in as second ruck for Geelong
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Pooolo.
Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime
SHUT UP KRIME!
SHUT UP KRIME!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Blake was playing defence when he went out. IMO, he'll be playing defence if he comes back. Perhaps to free up one of the guys playing tall defence right now (Fisher or Gwilt).
Polo, I'd imagine, will be replaced with a forward. Maybe Dunell, with somebody else coming in as the sub. Cripps or Siposs, maybe.
Polo, I'd imagine, will be replaced with a forward. Maybe Dunell, with somebody else coming in as the sub. Cripps or Siposs, maybe.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
I reckon he'll come back through the reserves. With Schneider hopefully available, and also Stanley who apparently is undergoing a test this week, Blake isn't desperately needed - not while he's underdone. We will need him against the cats the following week though.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
bigcarl wrote:He'd replace Kosi as second ruck you'd think
I dont it. Where would he play when not rucking?
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
perfectionist wrote:I'd drop Jack Steven.
I reckon he would drop you.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
plugger66 wrote:bigcarl wrote:He'd replace Kosi as second ruck you'd think
I dont it. Where would he play when not rucking?
Defence, but Blake can play just about anywhere.
Kosi's time is up, as you have said yourself recently.
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
bigcarl wrote:plugger66 wrote:bigcarl wrote:He'd replace Kosi as second ruck you'd think
I dont it. Where would he play when not rucking?
Defence, but Blake can play just about anywhere.
Kosi's time is up, as you have said yourself recently.
No I never said his time was up but i think you could be right. But he will play thats for sure. I dont see a spot in defence for Blakey and he is no good forward. Before he was injured he deserved to be played but things happen to over 30's when they are out of the side. Tom is that thing as is Jimmy improving weekly. I just cannot see where he can play.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Play him at full forward. He couldn't offer less than Kosi has been.plugger66 wrote: No I never said his time was up but i think you could be right. But he will play thats for sure. I dont see a spot in defence for Blakey and he is no good forward. Before he was injured he deserved to be played but things happen to over 30's when they are out of the side. Tom is that thing as is Jimmy improving weekly. I just cannot see where he can play.
It won't happen, I agree, but it should.
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
bigcarl wrote:Play him at full forward. He couldn't offer less than Kosi has been.plugger66 wrote: No I never said his time was up but i think you could be right. But he will play thats for sure. I dont see a spot in defence for Blakey and he is no good forward. Before he was injured he deserved to be played but things happen to over 30's when they are out of the side. Tom is that thing as is Jimmy improving weekly. I just cannot see where he can play.
It won't happen, I agree, but it should.
No it shouldnt. If they drop Kosi then Siposs or Wilkes are much better options at FF.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
I agree, but neither of them can play second ruck like Blake.plugger66 wrote:bigcarl wrote:Play him at full forward. He couldn't offer less than Kosi has been.plugger66 wrote: No I never said his time was up but i think you could be right. But he will play thats for sure. I dont see a spot in defence for Blakey and he is no good forward. Before he was injured he deserved to be played but things happen to over 30's when they are out of the side. Tom is that thing as is Jimmy improving weekly. I just cannot see where he can play.
It won't happen, I agree, but it should.
No it shouldnt. If they drop Kosi then Siposs or Wilkes are much better options at FF.
Last edited by bigcarl on Tue 07 Aug 2012 7:42pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
bigcarl wrote:Neither of them can play second ruck like Blake.plugger66 wrote:bigcarl wrote:
Play him at full forward. He couldn't offer less than Kosi has been.
It won't happen, I agree, but it should.
No it shouldnt. If they drop Kosi then Siposs or Wilkes are much better options at FF.
Now lets see BC. Kosi spends 80% of his time forward and 20% in the ruck doing bugger all and you want to play a non FF forward for 80% of the game so we have a ruckman for 20% of the game. Doesnt add up to me.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
plugger66 wrote:Now lets see BC. Kosi spends 80% of his time forward and 20% in the ruck doing bugger all and you want to play a non FF forward for 80% of the game so we have a ruckman for 20% of the game. Doesnt add up to me.
I think Kosi has been extraordinarily lucky to hold his place this long and it's time he was held to account.
The only reason I can think of that he hasn't been dropped thus far is that he can pinch hit as second ruck.
If they think Wilkes or Siposs can fill in as second ruck then I'm all for that, but Kosi needs to go unfortunately. It's very sad really as reportedly he's a great clubman and terrific fella.
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
bigcarl wrote:plugger66 wrote:Now lets see BC. Kosi spends 80% of his time forward and 20% in the ruck doing bugger all and you want to play a non FF forward for 80% of the game so we have a ruckman for 20% of the game. Doesnt add up to me.
I think Kosi has been extraordinarily lucky to hold his place this long and it's time he was held to account.
The only reason I can think of that he hasn't been dropped thus far is that he can pinch hit as second ruck.
If they think Wilkes or Siposs can fill in as second ruck then I'm all for that, but Kosi needs to go unfortunately. It's very sad really as reportedly he's a great clubman and terrific fella.
So you are not worried about a guy who has played 200 games and probably none at FF playing 80% of the game there just to have a second ruckman.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
I just made the point that he could not offer less than Kosi has been at full forward. I'm not really serious about him playing there and I agree that either Siposs or Wilkes are better options.plugger66 wrote:bigcarl wrote:plugger66 wrote:Now lets see BC. Kosi spends 80% of his time forward and 20% in the ruck doing bugger all and you want to play a non FF forward for 80% of the game so we have a ruckman for 20% of the game. Doesnt add up to me.
I think Kosi has been extraordinarily lucky to hold his place this long and it's time he was held to account.
The only reason I can think of that he hasn't been dropped thus far is that he can pinch hit as second ruck.
If they think Wilkes or Siposs can fill in as second ruck then I'm all for that, but Kosi needs to go unfortunately. It's very sad really as reportedly he's a great clubman and terrific fella.
So you are not worried about a guy who has played 200 games and probably none at FF playing 80% of the game there just to have a second ruckman.
But my real point is that Kosi's time is up and being to pinch hit in second ruck shouldn't keep him in the side.
Perhaps they will go with Wilkes?
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
cant see him being a walk up start, however may be used to keep kosi miles away from any rucking contests
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Blakey back.... who may go out
Blake is surely back up/horses for courses at that it?
Aka against Cats hed be useful......against Blues....not so useful.
Whatever happens Simpkin stays in.
Aka against Cats hed be useful......against Blues....not so useful.
Whatever happens Simpkin stays in.
“Yeah….nah””