Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
The more I hear the more I think it is a beat up. He will get 4 or 5 weeks but that is the most he should get. I reckon I have been sucked in as well. It should be 3 or 4 at the very most but that is it.
Said his act could appear unsportsmanlike but wasn't "That's why we;ve got a different claim to you". Does not accept that action brought game into disrepute
plugger66 wrote:The more I hear the more I think it is a beat up. He will get 4 or 5 weeks but that is the most he should get. I reckon I have been sucked in as well. It should be 3 or 4 at the very most but that is it.
Rubbish. A deliberate dog act. Unless you are Helen Keller.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Wilson for Judd; Tribunal has to be extremely careful given Adams' history of suspect shoulders. Ought not draw inference that he's suffered an injury with Judd's intention. Trying to refute AFL's suggestion he should have known risks of injury to Adams' earlier
plugger66 wrote:The more I hear the more I think it is a beat up. He will get 4 or 5 weeks but that is the most he should get. I reckon I have been sucked in as well. It should be 3 or 4 at the very most but that is it.
Rubbish. A deliberate dog act. Unless you are Helen Keller.
Sorry but that is my opinion. Seen plenty of dog acts not get anywhere this much media.
plugger66 wrote:The more I hear the more I think it is a beat up. He will get 4 or 5 weeks but that is the most he should get. I reckon I have been sucked in as well. It should be 3 or 4 at the very most but that is it.
Rubbish. A deliberate dog act. Unless you are Helen Keller.
Please it was nothing but a but of gamesmanship. Judd got ths reaction he wanted from Nth. The media have blown it out of the water.
matrix wrote:Wilson for Judd; Tribunal has to be extremely careful given Adams' history of suspect shoulders. Ought not draw inference that he's suffered an injury with Judd's intention. Trying to refute AFL's suggestion he should have known risks of injury to Adams' earlier
Oh, do Carlton are trying to say Judd is a dumb arse? :like:
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
plugger66 wrote:The more I hear the more I think it is a beat up. He will get 4 or 5 weeks but that is the most he should get. I reckon I have been sucked in as well. It should be 3 or 4 at the very most but that is it.
Rubbish. A deliberate dog act. Unless you are Helen Keller.
Please it was nothing but a but of gamesmanship. Judd got ths reaction he wanted from Nth. The media have blown it out of the water.
Your posts just keep getting better,
HE LEFT THE GROUND WITH A DISLOCATED SHOULDER
Yes I am shouting.
I reckon Steven would have been executed at the tribunal....... The most harshly dealt with player in my memory. And the club bent over and accepted it.
Chairman; fundamental question where you satisfied that Judd committed reportable offence of misconduct as alleged by AFL. If not, then is he guilty of misconduct as he has admitted
Nick Bowen:
I think it's safe to say Judd is going to get a holiday. It's just a matter of how long. If his version of events is excepted, he'll probably get about two weeks. If the AFL's version is accepted, he'll probably get 4+
Nick Bowen:
the Tribunal has the discretion to impose whatever penalty it wants. It's not bound by MRP points system
matrix wrote:Nick Bowen:
I think it's safe to say Judd is going to get a holiday. It's just a matter of how long. If his version of events is excepted, he'll probably get about two weeks. If the AFL's version is accepted, he'll probably get 4+
Nick Bowen:
the Tribunal has the discretion to impose whatever penalty it wants. It's not bound by MRP points system
Ok, but if they think it's worth say 4 weeks surely they must then apply any carry over points and loadings from past offenses
