Clarke
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Clarke
He was OK. Just OK.
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Clarke
Even his kick out wasn't a disaster rolled end over end and Jimmy didn't have his good touch from the past. Two years ago he would have grabbed that at speed and run away.
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7262
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: Clarke
Had a mixed bag. Some decisions about when to and when not to contest cost us a goal. But he also did some good things.
Did offer some drive and direction, but then again, when you're the free man in defence, that's the least you should be offering in the modern game.
Keeps his spot based on this but remains in the 20-22 bracket, especially when we've got some talented players to come back in.
Did offer some drive and direction, but then again, when you're the free man in defence, that's the least you should be offering in the modern game.
Keeps his spot based on this but remains in the 20-22 bracket, especially when we've got some talented players to come back in.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: Clarke
had a few scary moments, like that kick in defence, but he was hard at the ball tried all night and gave some run. if i was the coach he holds his spot
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- Hurricane
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
- Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira
Re: Clarke
This is the bit you still won't admit to being wrong about[/quote]Spud02 wrote:The guy is not AFL standard and 1 half decent game wont change that
BANG BANG
Because im not wrong about that.
He was good tonight no doubt about that. I'm happy to admit when im wrong (unlike so may others on here) but he was also good against Carlton in the last game last season. How did he do against Sydney in the final again?
Im far from convinced that he will ever consistently play at a level expected of a high draft pick with 8 years experience in a professional AFL set up.
BANG BANG
Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Re: Clarke
Agree with saint75. Really liked his game tonight. Thought our fwds were to blame for the loss tonight. Certainly thought that Clarke looked far more assured down back than he has in the past. Took a couple of great grabs in the last and provides really good run.saint75 wrote:You are kidding aren't you? Seriously, did you watch the game? Couple of errors (one costing a goal) but apart from that was excellent. There were plenty of errors made by various players on the field today (for both teams) but the pressure on the field tonight was high.Hurricane wrote:Im just going to say it
They guy is simply not AFL standard.
After 8 FN years the guy isnt going to get it. A more ruthless team would have delisted a spud like him years ago.
Enough is enough
BANG BANG
Easy to find a scapegoat in your disappointment, but to make that scapegoat Raph is boring and predictable and shows your lack of knowledge.
WE Need a proper Full Back! Clarke or anyone else down there is not our problem.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Clarke
I agree with the OP, it embarrassing sometimes watching Raph play.
That kick out.....I reckon a 4 year old could do better then that. For a professional footballer that is a disgrace!
Yes he did a few good things in the last quarter but in the 2nd and 3rd quarter he cost us the game and about 3-4 goals.
Countless times he was 5-10 metres off his man.
2-3 times went up in a pack to spoil and completely missed the ball consequently or failed to hit the pack, resulting in goals.
Just because he does 2-3 good things a game doesn't mean he deserves his spot.
A very good VFL player, s**t AFL player.
That kick out.....I reckon a 4 year old could do better then that. For a professional footballer that is a disgrace!
Yes he did a few good things in the last quarter but in the 2nd and 3rd quarter he cost us the game and about 3-4 goals.
Countless times he was 5-10 metres off his man.
2-3 times went up in a pack to spoil and completely missed the ball consequently or failed to hit the pack, resulting in goals.
Just because he does 2-3 good things a game doesn't mean he deserves his spot.
A very good VFL player, s**t AFL player.
Sainter for life.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Clarke
He wasn't the problem - it was, purely and simply, CONF****** conversion. Forget Raph bashing and ask yourselves 1 question - who MISSED when they should have converted.
BANG BANG, Bubba Bubba, we F***** up, AGAIN.
BANG BANG, Bubba Bubba, we F***** up, AGAIN.
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Clarke
Well, Hurricane, in the final against Sydney they dominated the ruck (monumental mistake to not play Gardiner particularly after his performance the week before) and accordingly the clearances meaning the ball was constantly in our defensive areas and our defence was under constant pressure resulting in Fisher kicking out on the full 3 or 4 times with hack defensive kicks.
From memory Sydney got 5/6 goals from free kicks - and the problem was they got those goals from free kicks because the ball was in their forward 50 so consistently - plus we had no forward pressure when we did manage to attack so Sydney just ran it out with ease compounding the pressure on our defence.
Hence Milera and Saad.
Given the pressure our back 6 actually held up quite well in that game.
The real problem was elsewhere.
Our rucks remain the real problem, as we saw tonight.
We had to initially call on Blake (who is not a full back and was out-classed) and then Koschitzke who gave us some presence late with some strong marking and effective, attacking ball control.
What I would not mind is if our tall forwards are afforded the same protection the Adelaide forwards were - touch them and they got frees whereas Roo and Kosi were belted off the ball before it was anywhere near the contest.
Plus Roo put into the deck - compare the 50 metre given against us for incidental contact after a mark was paid and where the Adelaide player was not put off balance.
Fisher and Schnieder ran into some form, Gwilt remained very rusty but again had height to deal with.
I am not sure why Simpkin was dropped. He gets to the front and effects spoils so 4 would not have been able to jump all over Kosi as he did.
Again, as with Richmond, you kick the goals and you win.
You miss so many set shots and opportunities and you lose - including because the points hands the ball over for a pressure free disposal.
Saad was really missed.
Selection for the next game will be interesting with hopefully Saad and Stanley available, Simpkin re-instated and others led by Newnes putting pressure on.
Geary, Blake and Milne go.
Milne's goals late do not save his bacon - the damage was done in the other 95 minutes and the goals he cost us.
From memory Sydney got 5/6 goals from free kicks - and the problem was they got those goals from free kicks because the ball was in their forward 50 so consistently - plus we had no forward pressure when we did manage to attack so Sydney just ran it out with ease compounding the pressure on our defence.
Hence Milera and Saad.
Given the pressure our back 6 actually held up quite well in that game.
The real problem was elsewhere.
Our rucks remain the real problem, as we saw tonight.
We had to initially call on Blake (who is not a full back and was out-classed) and then Koschitzke who gave us some presence late with some strong marking and effective, attacking ball control.
What I would not mind is if our tall forwards are afforded the same protection the Adelaide forwards were - touch them and they got frees whereas Roo and Kosi were belted off the ball before it was anywhere near the contest.
Plus Roo put into the deck - compare the 50 metre given against us for incidental contact after a mark was paid and where the Adelaide player was not put off balance.
Fisher and Schnieder ran into some form, Gwilt remained very rusty but again had height to deal with.
I am not sure why Simpkin was dropped. He gets to the front and effects spoils so 4 would not have been able to jump all over Kosi as he did.
Again, as with Richmond, you kick the goals and you win.
You miss so many set shots and opportunities and you lose - including because the points hands the ball over for a pressure free disposal.
Saad was really missed.
Selection for the next game will be interesting with hopefully Saad and Stanley available, Simpkin re-instated and others led by Newnes putting pressure on.
Geary, Blake and Milne go.
Milne's goals late do not save his bacon - the damage was done in the other 95 minutes and the goals he cost us.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Clarke
Newnes and Simpkin were victims of the plethora of 6 day breaks, I have no doubt. If players in general suffer because of such a dominant number of short turn arounds, then it is reasonable to expect the younguns will suffer more.
Newnes has done fine in his first year. Simpkin needed a rest - he's not the best aerobic athlete in the outfit (shin splints until the op at the end of last year), but he's honest.
I'm just rapt we're building a number of alternatives.
Newnes has done fine in his first year. Simpkin needed a rest - he's not the best aerobic athlete in the outfit (shin splints until the op at the end of last year), but he's honest.
I'm just rapt we're building a number of alternatives.
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8190
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 231 times
- Been thanked: 630 times
Re: Clarke
His run out of the backline was excellent. Watters will get the best out of him
In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
Re: Clarke
Clarke was good and apart from one weird kick to Gwilt nearly broke his neck trying tonight.
Good game.
Good game.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12115
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3712 times
- Been thanked: 2580 times
Re: Clarke
Clarke is absolutely in our best 22 on tonights effort.
Sipposs had kicked a beauty, Schneids kicked one from the 50m penallty and the game was in the balance just before half time when Milne blew our chances of 3 goals in a row. It was only 6 mintes to go and the Crows scored 2 in a row after that and went to the half time break with their chests out and with a bit of breathing space. I reckon if we could've got our noses in front at half time, that would've changed the game. Crows got a a goal early in the third and from then on we just struggled to get close.
Crows got 5 goals up in the middle of the third. We chased, we missed a few chances, but they were always going to lock down with such a big lead. Crows had a lead of 32 points with a couple of minutes left on the clock 'til 3/4 time. Don't know what happened in that last 8 minutes of the game where we nearly snatched it, but it was good to see the boys can turn it on when they want to. If Watters can bottle that type of urgency and run for 4 quarters I'd be happy.
Sipposs had kicked a beauty, Schneids kicked one from the 50m penallty and the game was in the balance just before half time when Milne blew our chances of 3 goals in a row. It was only 6 mintes to go and the Crows scored 2 in a row after that and went to the half time break with their chests out and with a bit of breathing space. I reckon if we could've got our noses in front at half time, that would've changed the game. Crows got a a goal early in the third and from then on we just struggled to get close.
Crows got 5 goals up in the middle of the third. We chased, we missed a few chances, but they were always going to lock down with such a big lead. Crows had a lead of 32 points with a couple of minutes left on the clock 'til 3/4 time. Don't know what happened in that last 8 minutes of the game where we nearly snatched it, but it was good to see the boys can turn it on when they want to. If Watters can bottle that type of urgency and run for 4 quarters I'd be happy.
Last edited by Scollop on Sat 16 Jun 2012 2:12am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Clarke
Raph was very good I thought -almost shows too much courage running with the flight and is sure to get cleaned up - was all over the ground and provided a lot of spread - unfortunately he is almost guaranteed a clanger or 2 per game which people all remember - if he can cut them out and continue to work on his run he could be very good - Maybe we will see his game game V west coast a few years back repeated more regularly......
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8395
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Clarke
Raph was all heart tonight - prefer to see him on a wing though pumping the ball into the forward line
Whilst his running with the flight of the ball and getting his fist on it was courageous unfortunately the ball was propelled towards the opps goal which continually put u under pressure
That said it was our absolute pathetic gimme shooting at goal that was the difference in the end
Love Raph but would prefer him running free rather than as a defence presence
Missed Simpkin tonight unfortunately it seemed our ins were under done
All is not lost
Whilst his running with the flight of the ball and getting his fist on it was courageous unfortunately the ball was propelled towards the opps goal which continually put u under pressure
That said it was our absolute pathetic gimme shooting at goal that was the difference in the end
Love Raph but would prefer him running free rather than as a defence presence
Missed Simpkin tonight unfortunately it seemed our ins were under done
All is not lost
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2010 11:34pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Clarke
You are absolutely correct. People go on about Blake not getting Brownlow votes and seriously how many times has Raph been in our best players in 8 years. Not to many times and yet people defend him, I dont get it. Time he went, in fact leave him in WA and do us all a favourHurricane wrote:Im just going to say it
They guy is simply not AFL standard.
After 8 FN years the guy isnt going to get it. A more ruthless team would have delisted a spud like him years ago.
Enough is enough
BANG BANG
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: Clarke
Could not question his effort tonight - few skill errors already highlighted and didn't clear it properly 3rd man up in a marking contest a couple times, but his run off half back and courage was excellent. Appears when he is named on a Friday morning some start writing the Raph Bash Post
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Clarke
What's he doing in over in WA?St Lenny wrote:Time he went, in fact leave him in WA and do us all a favour
I know he sometimes plays off his opponent a bit but that's ridiculous
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: Clarke
St Lenny wrote:You are absolutely correct. People go on about Blake not getting Brownlow votes and seriously how many times has Raph been in our best players in 8 years. Not to many times and yet people defend him, I dont get it. Time he went, in fact leave him in WA and do us all a favourHurricane wrote:Im just going to say it
They guy is simply not AFL standard.
After 8 FN years the guy isnt going to get it. A more ruthless team would have delisted a spud like him years ago.
Enough is enough
BANG BANG
How come it takes Raph 3 quarters to start to perform well?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2010 11:34pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Clarke
Typo, SA obviously. I have just had a look through all the write ups of the game and not in one of them was Raph named as being in the best for the night. So who has their blinkers on?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: Clarke
The Redeemer wrote:St Lenny wrote:You are absolutely correct. People go on about Blake not getting Brownlow votes and seriously how many times has Raph been in our best players in 8 years. Not to many times and yet people defend him, I dont get it. Time he went, in fact leave him in WA and do us all a favourHurricane wrote:Im just going to say it
They guy is simply not AFL standard.
After 8 FN years the guy isnt going to get it. A more ruthless team would have delisted a spud like him years ago.
Enough is enough
BANG BANG
How come it takes Raph 3 quarters to start to perform well?
probably the same three quarters his team mates forgot about too.